Astronomy & Space - June 2007

Or have you seen or know something about them?

2007-06-26 04:32:51 · 3 answers · asked by Jeremy Auldaney 2

2007-06-26 04:28:54 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

i kinda believe but it's so annoying not to have proof,are we just nuts?

2007-06-26 04:26:28 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-26 04:25:01 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-26 04:08:02 · 7 answers · asked by kid of phantom thief 1

2007-06-26 03:51:14 · 7 answers · asked by fried or boiled? 1

alot of people think we didnt, what do you think? and why?

2007-06-26 03:45:26 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you believe the whole 'Landing On The Moon' jazz??
why??

i mean, ok, you 'saw' it on tv......

who's to say it wasn't 'created in a basement in Hollywood'?

if man DID land on the moon, why hasn't he gone back?

2007-06-26 03:43:39 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-26 03:38:33 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Every burning process requires oxygen & no oxygen is available in space for stars to burn endlessly for billons of years.

2007-06-26 03:19:50 · 17 answers · asked by a 1

IN SCIENTIFIC TERMS PLEASE !

2007-06-26 02:05:54 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

how do weather elements like temperature,clouds precipitation humidity etc affect communication satellites?

2007-06-26 00:37:42 · 6 answers · asked by Vee 1

2007-06-26 00:19:16 · 5 answers · asked by cool_magon 1

i am doing from iist .

2007-06-25 23:54:16 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-25 23:32:43 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think that in the future, countries will fight with each other in space? If so, what will these space battles look like?

2007-06-25 23:19:34 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

If somehow the pilot was unable to perform his job while they are already at space, what will be the next procedure? Is the other crew able to take over and fly the space shuttle back to earth? Or auto pilot?

2007-06-25 21:38:00 · 4 answers · asked by Edy 1

the most popular theories hold the univers to be around 13.7 billion years old, give or take .2 billion.

I occasionally read of deep space objects in the neighborhood of 9 or 10 billion or more light-years distant, with accompanying "we're looking back into the past shortly after the big-bang" statements.

Considering an object, say, at one edge of the universe, at 3.7 billion years of age. By relativity the universe would have not been more than 7.4 billion light-years in extent.

By Michelson-Morley, light from such an object would take not more than 7.4 billion years to reach its destination, even if the universe is bigger by the time it gets there.

How do astronomers get around this when they claim to be able to see back that far? Are they looking at reflected/refracted light?

details plz
only a convincing answer will get best answer. otherwise you'll have to vote.

2007-06-25 21:32:19 · 8 answers · asked by kozzm0 7

we all know that mount everest is the highest here on earth but in other planet?

2007-06-25 21:02:06 · 10 answers · asked by dontaskme 1

a) normal matter
b) Dark Matter
c) radiation
d) Dark Energy
e) None are dominant

2007-06-25 20:42:22 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

wouldn't we know if it shows up on radar

2007-06-25 20:28:53 · 6 answers · asked by Michael 2

a) by its electromagnetic interaction with light
b) by its gravitational effect on normal matter or light
c) by its "anti-gravity" effect on the galaxies
d) by its X-ray emission
e) dark matter cannot be detected

2007-06-25 20:25:01 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

i just came home from a walk,
yes, i know its like 3 am.
anyways,
the moon was red..
that really creeped me out,
can anyone tell me why it was red?
i saw this in toronto, canada.
was it just here?
or was it every where?

2007-06-25 20:13:34 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

If so,what will they do with us?

2007-06-25 19:46:36 · 21 answers · asked by Life goes on... 6

.....is called its _____ track
(1) anomalous (2) evolutionary (3) life-line (4) t-tauri

2007-06-25 17:55:12 · 1 answers · asked by Girl 3

In my last question I did not intend to put forth a theory. I am trying to understand, and to distinguish what we know, and what theories there are.

So I say, it seems to me (not that I am holding to any of my assumptions, but for the purpose of questioning), that the universe can not have a shape because then photons would curve through space. Perhaps I am wrong. But then does the universe have a shape? If not then is it true that the universe has an envelope?

Actually we can not see 40 billion light years into space, such is based on assumptions. We can see 4 parsecs, and up to about 30 or 35 parsecs, but beyond that we can not tell distance.

2007-06-25 17:27:55 · 5 answers · asked by David L 4

2007-06-25 17:13:49 · 18 answers · asked by pisces02 4

I tried it, but it totally didn't work.

2007-06-25 15:49:45 · 19 answers · asked by Nick 3

cause i swear we all on a rock but man there is no way that u could fly off coarse no way shape or form is there anyway the universe could be heald in orbit to make the world pivit around it like mayb at stoneheagne

2007-06-25 15:49:24 · 8 answers · asked by dangelo m 1

My science teacher has no idea.

2007-06-25 15:48:09 · 15 answers · asked by Nick 3