Science & Mathematics - 2 November 2007

please explain how u worked it out thanks

2007-11-02 03:22:15 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Mathematics

I am a metallurgical engineer having experience in material testing

2007-11-02 03:20:56 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Engineering

If electricity is electrons pulled from the air I dont think it could work in a vacuum.

2007-11-02 03:19:49 · 8 answers · asked by Ken 1 in Physics

...or more specifically, time-scale disruption is a brief glimpse into the ethereal. We've all heard people say that when they were in a car accident, time slowed down. Not like "gee is it ever going to be quitting time" but even these segments show us the variability of time.

I was thinking recently of human longevity. How if we went through life totally present in the now, how time would slow and we would live much "longer" than we do now.
Why use medical science to give us more calendar years when all we have to do is be more present and just live our moments to quadruple our "life-time".

Any insights?

2007-11-02 03:18:46 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Alternative

For example:
1-the act of taking the meniscus out by surgery.
2-a group of muscles.
3-muscles joined together.
4-a therapy using heat.
5- state after a surgery.
6-is there anything like "cinesio therapy"?
7 is there anything like "goose paw" in orthopedics?
8-a treatment using therapy is a...........treatment.
9-is there a specific word for the articulation of the knee?

You cannot imagine how much I need your answer.
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!

2007-11-02 03:14:01 · 3 answers · asked by Mary Hellen 2 in Medicine

In this,
(x)2 = 0
So, what is 'x' ? ('x' does not = 0)


If u want the ans of it e-mail me.

2007-11-02 03:11:47 · 9 answers · asked by *VJ* 2 in Mathematics

2007-11-02 03:04:26 · 5 answers · asked by w_earps 1 in Other - Science

I have a test monday and i'm lost we are in the gas chapter and thermodynamic chapter. Could someone explain what the molecular velocities and grahams law of effusion is? What is the root-mean-square velocity of gas particles? What in the h*** is enthalpy, change in enthalpy, Hess's law, and calorimetry and how does it relate to chemical equations? My teacher is Russian and she has a strong accents o I dont understand what she is saying and the books is evem more difficult to understand with all thise different triangles and letter and stuff...i've even bought 2 different chemistry books outside of my text book and they both explain the gas and thermochemistry chapters very confusing, I just feel like giving up some1 please help. Eveytime i ask someone to help me they claim they have a paper to write or something to do that is more important than the test.

2007-11-02 03:03:56 · 4 answers · asked by YeaWutever 2 in Chemistry

sodiumbicarbonate
zinc chloride
chlorine
flourine
lead chloride
barium chloride
coper chloride
formic acid
haemoglobine
copperoxide

2007-11-02 03:02:32 · 2 answers · asked by javed q 1 in Chemistry

I started some popcorn plants indoors in June and grew them in containers. They have never been outside, but now the plants look like they are dying. Will they die even if kept indoors?

2007-11-02 03:02:00 · 2 answers · asked by debodun 2 in Botany

2007-11-02 03:01:18 · 4 answers · asked by shablax 2 in Medicine

my boyfriend has a disc that he thinks is platnium and im not so sure any tips?

2007-11-02 02:59:27 · 2 answers · asked by christa d 1 in Zoology

2007-11-02 02:55:49 · 3 answers · asked by kyana g 1 in Zoology

tell me i am right

2007-11-02 02:54:24 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Mathematics

im an under graduate interested in undertaking these projects for practical knowledge

2007-11-02 02:47:45 · 1 answers · asked by shiva r 1 in Engineering

I heard it's something to do w/ the sunrise and time???

2007-11-02 02:37:56 · 10 answers · asked by M.P. 5 in Physics

FIRST - do not say go buy bug spray! we have a pest control guy who comes here once every 2 months or so to spray around (its an apartment thing) and he came last week.

i looked at http://bugguide.net and couldn't find it.

kind of freaked me out to find it in my bedroom my cats playing with it, trying to eat it actually.

it was brown thing about 3/4 inch long and REALLY thin with a forked tail (NOT long) that was the same brown not antenna like, but it did have a head that protruded from the body a tad and had antennas, thing is it had clear/whiteish legs (6) and they were smallish and no wings. the body is also a darkish brown shell like texture. i didnt see any mandibles.

http://bugguide.net/node/view/110906/bgpage
kind of like that except no wings, thinner body, smaller clearish whiteish legs that actually looked more seperated from the body (now that i think about it) but this ones heads too big in proportion to its body n no visible mandibles.
maybe its a baby that?

2007-11-02 02:35:38 · 4 answers · asked by star9crystal 2 in Biology

Why might you be hesitant to store a ton of ammonium nitrate in your basement at the request of an acquaintance?

2007-11-02 02:26:24 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Earth Sciences & Geology

Also, which type is the sun classified as?

2007-11-02 02:23:48 · 3 answers · asked by LuvPnk 1 in Astronomy & Space

Please explain how to calculate, I'm really lost

2007-11-02 02:22:42 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Physics

A mass of 8.60 kg rests on a smooth surface inclined 37.0(deg) above the horizontal. It is kept from sliding down the plane by a spring attached to the wall. the spring is aligned with the plane and has a spring constant of 125 N/m. How much does the spring stretch?

2007-11-02 02:19:02 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Physics

2007-11-02 02:05:31 · 2 answers · asked by mukendi n 1 in Astronomy & Space

If you know the earth isn't 6,000 years old, than prove man's radiocarbon dating techniques are infallible.

2007-11-02 02:05:09 · 18 answers · asked by Let's Debate 1 in Earth Sciences & Geology

Evaluate the limit.
lim_(x->infinity) x^(7/x)

Evaluate the limit.
lim_(x->infinity)

(sqrt(x^2 + 10 x) - x)

2007-11-02 02:04:37 · 2 answers · asked by ineedhelpbadly 2 in Mathematics

please tell me if my answer is true or false

2007-11-02 02:02:56 · 4 answers · asked by ilovedstny 1 in Mathematics

Scientists with impressive credentials are leaving the doctrines of evolution. Unfortunately, no one has informed the general public.

As Science Digest reported:

Scientists who utterly reject Evolution may be one of our fastest-growing controversial minorities... Many of the scientists supporting this position hold impressive credentials in science.

Evolutionist Sir Fred Hoyle:

The notion that...the operating programme of a living cell could be arrived at by chance in a primordial soup here on the Earth is evidently nonsense of a high order.

Researcher and Mathematician I. L. Cohen:

At that moment, when the DNA/RNA system became understood, the debate between Evolutionists and Creationists should have come to a screeching halt. ...the implications of the DNA/RNA were obvious and clear. Mathematically speaking, based on probability concepts, there is no possibility that Evolution was the mechanism that created the approximately 6,000,000 species of plants and animals we recognize today.

Evolutionist Michael Denton:

The complexity of the simplest known type of cell is so great that it is impossible to accept that such an object could have been thrown together suddenly by some kind of freakish, vastly improbable, event. Such an occurrence would be indistinguishable from a miracle.

Peter Saunders (University of London) and Mae-Wan Ho (Open University):

From the claims made for neo-Darwinism one could easily get the impression that it has made great progress towards explaining Evolution, mostly leaving the details to be cleared up. In fact, quite the reverse is true.

Evolutionist Dr. Colin Patterson:

No one has ever produced a species by mechanisms of natural selection. No one has ever gotten near it...

Evolutionist Greg Kirby:

If you were to spend your life picking up bones and finding little fragments of head and little fragments of jaw, there's a very strong desire there to exaggerate the importance of those fragments...

Evolutionist Lord Solly Zuckerman:

Students of fossil primates have not been distinguished for caution... The record is so astonishing that it is legitimate to ask whether much science is...in this field at all.

Evolutionist Tom Kemp:

A circular argument arises: Interpret the fossil record in terms of a particular theory of evolution, inspect the interpretation, and note that it confirms the theory. Well, it would, wouldn't it?

Evolutionist Edmund Ambrose:

We have to admit that there is nothing in the geological records that runs contrary to the view of conservative creationists...

Paleontologist and Evolutionist Dr. Niles Eldredge, American Museum of Natural History:

The only competing explanation for the order we all see in the biological world is the notion of Special Creation.

Sir Fred Hoyle, astronomer, cosmologist, and mathematician, Cambridge University:

I have little hesitation in saying that a sickly pall now hangs over the big bang theory.

Thomas Barnes, Ph.D., physicist:

The best physical evidence that the earth is young is a dwindling resource that evolutionists refuse to admit is dwindling...the magnetic energy in the field of the earth's dipole magnet. ...To deny that it is a dwindling resource is phony physics.

Sir Fred Hoyle, astronomer, cosmologist, and mathematician, Cambridge University:

The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 noughts after it... It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. ...if the beginnings of life were not random, they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.

Molecular biologist Michael Denton:

Is it really credible that random processes could have constructed a reality, the smallest element of which—a functional protein or gene—is complex beyond...anything produced by the intelligence of man?

C. Everett Koop, former U.S. Surgeon General:

When I make an incision with my scalpel, I see organs of such intricacy that there simply hasn't been enough time for natural evolutionary processes to have developed them.

Mathematician P. Saunders and biologist M. Ho:

We ourselves would be less concerned about falsifiability if neo-Darwinism were a powerful theory with major successes to its credit. But this is simply not the case.

C. Martin in American Scientist:

The mass of evidence shows that all, or almost all, known mutations are unmistakably pathological and the few remaining ones are highly suspect.

Pierre-Paul Grassé, Evolutionist:

No matter how numerous they may be, mutations do not produce any kind of Evolution.

Arthur Koestler, author:

In the meantime, the educated public continues to believe that Darwin has provided all the relevant answers by the magic formula of random mutations plus natural selection—quite unaware of the fact that random mutations turned out to be irrelevant and natural selection a tautology.

Norman Macbeth:

Darwinism has failed in practice.

Lyall Watson, Ph.D., Evolutionist:

Modern apes...seem to have sprung out of nowhere. They have no yesterday, no fossil record. And the true origin of modern humans...is, if we are to be honest with ourselves, an equally mysterious matter.

Wolfgang Smith, Ph.D.:

The Evolutionist thesis has become more stringently unthinkable than ever before...

John Woodmorappe, geologist:

Eighty to eighty-five percent of Earth's land surface does not have even 3 geologic periods appearing in 'correct' consecutive order. ...it becomes an overall exercise of gargantuan special pleading and imagination for the evolutionary-uniformitarian paradigm to maintain that there ever were geologic periods.

Evolutionist S. Lovtrup:

Micromutations do occur, but the theory that these alone can account for evolutionary change is either falsified, or else it is an unfalsifiable, hence metaphysical theory. I suppose that nobody will deny that is a great misfortune if an entire branch of science becomes addicted to a false theory. But this is what has happened in biology: ...I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science. When this happens many people will pose the question: How did this ever happen?

J. O'Rourke in the American Journal of Science:

The intelligent layman has long suspected circular reasoning in the use of rocks to date fossils and fossils to date rocks. The geologist has never bothered to think of a good reply.

N. H. Nilsson, famous botanist and Evolutionist:

My attempts to demonstrate Evolution by an experiment carried on for more than 40 years have completely failed.

Luther Sunderland, science researcher:

None of the five museum officials could offer a single example of a transitional series of fossilized organisms that would document the transformation of one basically different type to another.

Tom Kemp of Oxford University:

As is well known, most fossil species appear instantaneously in the fossil record.

Francis Hitching, archaeologist:

The curious thing is that there is a consistency about the fossil gaps; the fossils are missing in all the important places.

David Kitts, paleontologist and Evolutionist:

Evolution requires intermediate forms between species and paleontology does not provide them.

Gary Parker, Ph.D., biologist and paleontologist and former Evolutionist:

Fossils are a great embarrassment to Evolutionary theory and offer strong support for the concept of Creation.

Wolfgang Smith, Ph.D., physicist and mathematician:

A growing number of respectable scientists are defecting from the evolutionist camp. ...moreover, for the most part these 'experts' have abandoned Darwinism, not on the basis of religious faith or biblical persuasions, but on strictly scientific grounds, and in some instances, regretfully.

I. Cohen, mathematician and archaeologist:

It is not the duty of science to defend the theory of Evolution, and stick by it to the bitter end—no matter what illogical and unsupported conclusions it offers...

Ludwig von Bertalanffy, biologist:

The fact that a theory so vague, so insufficiently verifiable, and so far from the criteria otherwise applied in 'hard' science has become a dogma can only be explained on sociological grounds.

Malcolm Muggeridge, well-known philosopher:

The theory of Evolution...will be one of the great jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it has.

2007-11-02 02:00:56 · 30 answers · asked by Let's Debate 1 in Biology

2007-11-02 01:52:02 · 8 answers · asked by terriann m 1 in Medicine

I mean Alpha are He nucleus (Atomic mass=4)
Why are not emitted simplier particles, like for example H nucleus (Atomic mass=1) emitted?

2007-11-02 01:50:40 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Physics

2007-11-02 01:46:40 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Physics

2007-11-02 01:40:25 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Mathematics