English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 30 October 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

and we do not care about many of your issues?

It seems a high percentage of these questions involve US politics. Of course some of your issues are important to the rest of the world but many are very regional and unless you live in the US, they mean nothing.

2007-10-30 04:23:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or, would the kids need to say it was OK?
If it was easily removable, would this be a good idea to protect our kids?
I am thinking more younger kids, who may be abducted, and not the 16 or 17 year old out partying too late.

Thank You, As Always.

2007-10-30 04:17:32 · 12 answers · asked by Supercell 5

It is remarkable how many political "solutions" today are dealing with problems created by previous political "solutions." Three examples that come to mind immediately are the housing market crisis, the wildfires in southern California, and the water shortages in the west.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2007/10/30/political_solutions

2007-10-30 04:15:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or is he just itching for a showdown like the uncooperative unitary cowboy that he is?

2007-10-30 04:13:14 · 5 answers · asked by oohhbother 7

A) Looks ridiculous
B) The banner should have been higher and centered
C) Great I am totally into patriotic ceremonies
D) Na didn't do much for me

2007-10-30 03:56:47 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please add details, including opinion, and facts.
Thanks.

2007-10-30 03:48:54 · 13 answers · asked by xenypoo 7

I'm all for anything that helps prevent more young, single mothers on welfare. Obviously parents keep failing at keeping their children from getting pregnant. Even the hardcore Christians' children do this.

2007-10-30 03:45:51 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Feeble minded and rather forgetful was the definition of the man I saw. What was his wife thinking when she encouraged him to run?

2007-10-30 03:31:01 · 9 answers · asked by alphabetsoup2 5

I saw a picture of the people who were to march and I think that hate white or are racist them selfs, will this march led to civil rioting and or shootings?

This is not apolitical event like politicans say hey I can save the day and get some votes here, these people are serious and that means there is a real threat.

What do you think.

http://www.wvgazette.com/section/News/2007102923

The man behind the speaker says it all without even saying a word.

2007-10-30 03:28:39 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-30 03:26:17 · 18 answers · asked by Spartacus 3

and the election in Louisiana last week? Hint: It has to do with the voters waking up.

2007-10-30 03:21:00 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Regarding the war and the Patriot Act?

2007-10-30 03:05:15 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

1) Believe in free enterprise? All I hear on YA from you goof balls is that profit = bad. If someone wants to buy or listen to something (talk radio), shouldn't the be allowed? Isn't this a free country?

2) Believe in free speech? Again all I hear on YA from you goof balls is that talk radio = bad. Aren't these people citizens of the united states? Don't they have the same freedoms that you and I have to express our minds. They provide a product that people want to either buy or listen to. That falls under Free Enterprise.

Just because you don't like what these individuals to say, what right do you have to ban it?

Liberal talk radio failed. I listened to it for a week. All they did was bash Bush the whole time and didn't offer any solutions or proposals. Therefore it failed under the free enterprise system.

2007-10-30 03:02:15 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bush and Co. (and most Americans) see a rising threat in Iran. The parties differ, though, in their ideas on how to nip that threat in the bud.

Some say the threat of a military strike will keep them in line. But many liberal Democrats say "we need to talk" with Iran rather than fight with them.

Hmmm... maybe. But when Iran's President Ahmadinejad was invited to speak at the liberal Columbia University. He was insulted in his introduction and frequently thereafter. Is this the liberals' idea of "taking" with Iran? How can they see this as helpful? Why would Ahmadinejad want to participate in such "talks."

Have Democrats given away the White House in '08 over this issue?

Discuss.

2007-10-30 03:02:12 · 19 answers · asked by DeeDee Cortez 2

The media and the government has labeled the Kurds as rebels, but they are against the better good of the Turkey people, and the Turkey government. So they are in fact terrorist, so regardless of what Iraq thinks they are. The United States should say to Turkey, we know you do not need our help. But we want the world to see that terrorist in any disguise is not tolerated, and we are here already combating terrorist so please allow us to help you. Then squeeze them between our troops and the troops in Turkey and make them stop. If we as a country that is totally against terrorist in any form, and we passively sit back while it is happening right under our troops nose. Then we must impose the very same sanctions on ourselves. We can not worry about the Iraqi governement and whether they back these so called rebels, we must do what we say we will do, not only where we can receive a political gain, but whena country and it citizens can be safe it is a must.

2007-10-30 02:41:08 · 7 answers · asked by Carl H 1

It has double standarts , is o.k. with communist China ,but has an enbargo with Cuba that is closer to us and a part of the new world , also ,this very important Cuba has no nuclear weapons to destroy , China is a threat to the United States !!! So wchich is???

2007-10-30 02:28:21 · 11 answers · asked by Maria R 6

In polls taken in non friendly areas of the world, it is astounding the digree of support for Hillary, Obama, Al Gore, John Kerry among anti American groups.

Shouldn't that wake up the Democratic Party?

2007-10-30 02:26:19 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images/view?back=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.search.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fimages%3Fei%3DUTF-8%26p%3Dsean%2520hannity%26fr2%3Dtab-web%26fr%3Dush-ans&w=510&h=768&imgurl=pssht.com%2Fimages%2FFreeRing.jpg&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpssht.com%2Fimages%2FFreeRing.jpg&size=103.7kB&name=FreeRing.jpg&p=sean+hannity&type=jpeg&no=6&tt=17%2C408&oid=a2f38c18ebb6a5a8&ei=UTF-8

2007-10-30 02:05:41 · 25 answers · asked by Resurrected 2

Ogg Bash enemies with rock.
Ogg give many babies to women.

2007-10-30 01:59:24 · 10 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6

The surge is working. When you look at all the negative statistics - they're all WAY down.

Should we now just resolve to stay and get the job?

2007-10-30 01:52:29 · 18 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1

Women have ran for President in the past. Over 200 years of "equality" (notice the quotes in equality) and no woman has been good enough to win?
Are people in America brainwashed to believe that only men can lead ??

2007-10-30 01:07:43 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does this symbolize in some small way the difference between the broadcasting mediums? One, a demagogue with a big mouth and a one way conversation to its listeners, the other offering reporting on interesting topics of the day...

2007-10-30 00:47:57 · 13 answers · asked by alphabetsoup2 5

It would explain why so many Dems support her.

2007-10-30 00:35:56 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-30 00:03:47 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers