2007-10-30 02:02:57 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She did vote for this war and every dollar that has gone to it. Also for the Patriot Act
2007-10-30 02:04:11 · update #1
Free Radical- I do support this war or our presidents policies. What do you have to say now!
2007-10-30 02:09:25 · update #2
Excuse me - I do not support the war and have been very vocal about that on here
2007-10-30 02:11:30 · update #3
Don- Those that voted yes for this are just as guilty!
2007-10-30 02:14:36 · update #4
Many people find life hard and would rather have someone else make all their lives decisions for them.
These people are quite happy receiving a stipend for their work so they can buy their beer or booze and just forget about life while they are alive.
2007-10-30 02:09:16 · answer #1 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Agreed. If I were American, I would study the voting record of my candidates and onlyvote for a dem candidate who opposed the war from day one. No one (of political significance) in Canada, France or Germany was tricked by GWB so why was Hillary? She is an opportunist and bandwagon jumper and as such of low moral worth - still better than most GOP candidates but not much more.
The challenge is that she has such a lead, she will win the nomination regardless and unless you want 4 or 8 more years of economic suicide, international ridicule and loss of liberties you may need to support the party's candidate regardless, making a pragmatic choice but one that has you supporting someone of questionable character. Sucks to be an American under these circumstances.
2007-10-30 09:19:04 · answer #2 · answered by davster 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I suppose since many supported war monger extrodinaire George W. Bush there will be some who support a lesser proponent of war is such a person exists. What rights has Hillary taken away from you?
These are the same questions we are asked when we show evidence (which you have not) of what Bush has done.
2007-10-30 10:14:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even assuming that any of what you say is accurate, what are the choices? Realistically, most of the other Democratic candidates, although good individuals, are not likely to win the nomination. Obama or Edwards would have to be able to garner more support than Hillary has and that is not looking very good for either of them.
The Republican candidates are a hopeless lot with nothing to say and Ron Paul has no chance. So what do you suggest?
2007-10-30 09:35:48 · answer #4 · answered by tribeca_belle 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Don C. just kicked your hiney.
And I'm falling on the floor laughing at your post about a "warmonger and rights taker" when this country has been seized by just such a person for the past seven years.
You guys just kill me!
2007-10-30 09:24:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hey do you honestly think she knows what she is doing. She has no clue about War or Military matters, she does what she is told to by the people who are teling her what to say, the liberal traitors she is surrounded by
WOW Don C all that "Taken away" from me by Bush yet IT DOES NOT EFFECT me in any way ! WHY because I am not a terrorist or doing anything wrong, honestly what are you liberals whining about !
2007-10-30 09:09:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Hillary Who? Stop talking about her.
2007-10-30 10:02:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
THESE ARE THE RIGHTS AMERICANS LOST UNDER
GEORGE W BUSH
FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: Government may monitor religious and political institutions without suspecting criminal activity to assist terror investigations.
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION: Government has closed once-public immigration hearings, has secretly detained hundreds of people without charges, and has encouraged bureaucrats to resist public records questions.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH: Government may prosecute librarians or keepers of any other records if they tell anyone that the government subpoenaed information related to a terror investigation.
RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION: Government may monitor federal prison jailhouse conversations between attorneys and clients, and deny lawyers to Americans accused of crimes.
FREEDOM FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES: Government may search and seize Americans' papers and effects without probable cause to assist terror investigation.
RIGHT TO A SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL: Government may jail Americans indefinitely without a trial.
RIGHT TO LIBERTY: Americans may be jailed without being charged or being able to confront witnesses against them.
2007-10-30 09:13:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
She can fool some of the people some of the time but ie New Yorker's
America is too smart to elect her
2007-10-30 09:18:40 · answer #9 · answered by Johnny 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
A better question... Why do people insist you are a Bush supporter just because you hate Clinton? While Bush is a dishonest lying idiot that does not mean Clinton is not a BIGGER and more dishonest lying idiot!
2007-10-30 09:10:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋