English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

Poor unemployed children? So you want children working then? Yikes.

2007-10-30 03:23:06 · answer #1 · answered by thor_torkenson 5 · 7 1

Poor children are getting health care. They always have and they always will. That's never been a question or an issue. But you get extra points for your creative spewing of the liberal propaganda. Your socialist handlers would be so proud. As for the poor 'unemployed' children, I dunno. Aren't most children unemployed? Don't we have labor laws for that?

The war on terrorism benefits all Americans, not just the poor and that is what the government is intended to do. The government was NEVER intended to be a charitable organization. It's simply become one because Americans are a compassionate people...maybe too compassionate since America is quickly becoming a dependency state with more and more Americans sucking off the government tit when they're perfectly capable of supporting themselves.

2007-10-30 03:31:43 · answer #2 · answered by The emperor has no clothes 7 · 2 1

How about this, returning the tax dollars to the individuals that overpaid their fair share of taxes and EARNED the money in the first place? Why should a working class family pay the government 10 grand a year in taxes to support the children of poor people when their tax dollars would be better off paying for their own health insurance (which they can not currntly afford)?

2007-10-30 03:24:19 · answer #3 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 4 2

I would hope that all children would be "unemployed" as anything but studying in school to become the best adults they can become.

As to health care, it is stupid not to have the best care possible for everyone, not just unemployed children.

Quite aside from the morality of killing a million people to justify lies, very little of the trillion dollars it is costing us is actually going to those horrors. If we just taxed the fraud at 100% it would pay for healthcare for everyone easily.

2007-10-30 03:31:11 · answer #4 · answered by Freedem 3 · 0 2

What baby do you be attentive to ever been grew to become removed from scientific interest? Who do you be attentive to has teenagers ever been grew to become away by using wellness midsection medical doctors? do no longer you think of that if there particularly grew to become right into a situation with our wellness care one: we would not be having human beings sneaking in, or unquestionably being waiting to have the money for to come again right here, from different international locations all worldwide huge attempting to get wellness care that unquestionably works, and a pair of: if teenagers are being missed for any sort of scientific care or no longer getting the astounding scientific care, do you no longer think of it may be the mum and father of the youngsters making a extensive fuss and not a team of desperate leftist politicians attempting to tutor this u . s . a . right into a socialist u . s . a . by using making the folk each and every of the extra based by using handouts? If teenagers have been unquestionably getting terrible scientific care that the two did no longer something, made it worse and unquestionably brought about their dying. it may be the mum and father complaining approximately something desiring to be completed and not politicians. the only time a baby would not get carry of wellness care is that if the mum and father themselves do no longer supply their own baby any scientific interest. i do no longer elect my taxes to be hiked for this. each and every time Hillary tried to get this handed it failed because of the fact there grew to become right into a loss of youngsters to connect up considering that, properly, exceedingly lots anyone can get scientific interest whilst they want it devoid of having to attend 3-6 months down the line on a waiting record!

2016-11-09 20:31:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Best use of tax revenues:
1. Universal health care
2. Development of solar and other alternative energy, this would create well paying jobs that we should keep in the US.
3. National defense
4. Rebuild and improve US infrastructure
5. Free higher education.
6. Passage of a bill in Congress to keep jobs in the US

Sadly these suggestions are just the tip of the iceberg there are far too many aspects of our government and society that have gone wrong since the Reagan administration.

2007-10-30 03:35:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Are those the only choices?
P.S. Poor children do receive healthcare. Its called "the emergency room" per the generosity of John Q. Taxpayer.

2007-10-30 03:27:28 · answer #7 · answered by Charzb 3 · 3 1

I would certainly hope the children are unemployed, otherwise you would be screaming about child labor laws....


"We the People of the United States, in Order
to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure
domestic Tranquility, provide for the common
defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure
the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our
Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution
for the United States of America."

Notice how the Founders used "Provide" for common defense and "Promote" for general welfare.....

2007-10-30 03:24:09 · answer #8 · answered by Cookies Anyone? 5 · 4 2

Health care for the children of people with low incomes. It benefits the middle class, by not only insuring their children, but allowing them to spend less money on their insurance (private insurance is 1200+ a month) and thus allowing them to reinvest in other parts of the economy. It helps prevent lost earnings by the parents as well as for the child as they would be given preventative medicine. Preventative health care could also help lower our SSI payments in the future.

2007-10-30 03:22:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Apparently, war with Iran and secret prisons take priority over Brain Tumor Timmy and Leukemia Lucy.

2007-10-30 03:21:09 · answer #10 · answered by Tibbs 2 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers