Politics - 9 July 2007

He spent his entire time as Bill Clinton's vice-president attending the coronation of the grand prince of Upper Bophuthatswana and other "important" events. He obviously didn't get enough when he lost the Florida re-count in 2000 (and if you don't think he lost, just ask the New York Times, CNN, the Washington Post and the University of Pennsylvania...who all did their own investigations and they all came to the same conclusion: Bush won the re-count.)

But now, Al Gore is getting all the love (and money) that he never could get before. Hollywood loves him, the DNC no longer looks at him as a loser, and he's moments away from being crowned "The Green Jesus."
So, will he risk losing all this love by running for President in '08?

2007-07-09 16:49:42 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is Bush trying to stall for time or is Congress letting them stall? Should the people of the US stand up and take their country back. Would that make you feel patriotic?

2007-07-09 16:31:18 · 19 answers · asked by Enigma 6

Why do Democrats insist that life is the number one S.T.D.?

Could be that “life” is after all, sexually transmitted.
Could be that “life” unlike any other S.T.D. - has a 100% mortality rate.

Don’t take “it” too seriously; you’re not getting out alive no matter who you have in your pocket.

2007-07-09 16:24:23 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is this why the "Biography of President George W. Bush" is ranked #1 when you search "failure" on Yahoo?

2007-07-09 16:20:48 · 11 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

He was just on his show stating that DICK created a new security classification called TOP SECRET/SCI.
Did he not know that this is a real security classification system that the government has used years before edick's time?

I hope the libs laugh at him too...hell, I laugh at ann coulter. LOL

2007-07-09 16:08:49 · 14 answers · asked by Tall Chicky 4

Branch because he is President of the Senate?

He agrued that point when the Archives wanted his classified and declassified papers!!

So anyone in his office should be available to testify before Congress if they call on them!

Right?

2007-07-09 15:53:05 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is the G.O.P. history because George W. Bush is such a P.O.S. (No… I don’t mean ‘Point Of Sale’) or have they made their own bed?

As an independent, I can honestly say that I’m now leaning to the “left” because the Republican Party has been playing EVERYONE for fools. I even (almost) feel sorry for the Shrub, The G.O.P. has even taken “him” for a ride along with the “Bible Thumpers”.

I get the feeling that a “Republican” Party will do ANYTHING at all - to win an election, even commit “treason” to protect their ideology – whatever that is.

2007-07-09 15:50:57 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-09 15:47:30 · 11 answers · asked by why? 1

that the USA is now the most hated country in the world?

Isn't it obvious that this is the case?

It kind of is don't you think?

2007-07-09 15:39:21 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

"A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

2007-07-09 15:38:10 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-09 15:36:26 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-09 15:36:20 · 3 answers · asked by JBS7878 3

that it will only make people in the middle east more eager to kill us (Americans) and that it is set up to worse and worse fighting?

2007-07-09 15:20:29 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you can forget left vs right and really look at what is happening because US forces went into Iraq

We have become less safe because of the invasion (says the intel community)

A bunch bunch of people have gotten killed.

Billions have been thrown away.

And no real threat coming out of iraq was ever found

There is no end in sight and things look like they are only going to get worse.

I sure would like to hear some good things about all this 'cause I can't think of any.

2007-07-09 15:17:34 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

The President needs the aproval of Congress to go to war

Yes 90 days after the fact - He can invade Iran and then seek Congrressional aproval later

He could do this just after an attack - by Iran -

He could then respond - it would seem natural who would question ?

Then he could after the attack on America by Iran - declare martial law as is spelled out in the Presidential and Homeland security directive 51

Just before the election what the Americans call false flag and the rest of the world calls a black op

Manage to go to war with Iran (no Congresional approval required for a war up to 90 days ) and declare martial law suspending the elections until "order could be restored"
----------------------------------------------------
Please poke holes in that -
I want to be wrong -
I want to believe that isn't the purpose of the Nuclear posture review and directive 51 and the 300 million dollar camps -
So tell me how all those things sould lead me

2007-07-09 15:11:16 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-09 15:09:51 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I can't imagine

2007-07-09 15:04:51 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

and Blast the Mideastern Dish-Net with Ronald Reagan's Star Wars blaster beam.

In previous wars we always took out the enemy communications.

2007-07-09 15:00:00 · 6 answers · asked by ? 2

Isn't this because the idiots who would vote for this airhead can't read very fast or do the morons running yahoo just like to see her name in the news?

2007-07-09 14:59:53 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-09 14:54:19 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Turn off the News Camera and start marrying Iocal girls. Like we did in Germany Japan and Korea???

2007-07-09 14:46:02 · 5 answers · asked by ? 2

Marxist teaching tells us that the capitalist counties will flock to the cheap labor of communists and argue over the purchase of the rope that hangs them...words to the effect.

2007-07-09 14:42:47 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

As a liberal dead Jewish comedian I'm all for a good joke. But these guys are beating us like a borrowed mule.

2007-07-09 14:37:32 · 6 answers · asked by ? 2

a very small fraction of the 1.3 billion actually terrorizes people? i hear from people ALL THE TIME that Muslims are terrorists and are commanded to kill all non Muslims according to their religion and commandments.

so how come those religious Muslims don't go out and actually kill others if they would get the ultimate reward for doing such heinous acts ? why is it that only maybe 1% of those 1.3 billion not doing what they are supposedly commanded to do in exchange for the "72 virgins" ??

2007-07-09 14:36:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

It seems to me he is doing a fine job now as an X president. Very responsible and can't be bought.

2007-07-09 14:34:39 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

We must finish training the Iraqi forces and then pull out,
Isn't that a nother reason why a time line would be inapropriate, Exactly how long will it take for them to be able to defend them selves? as if telling the enemy how long to hide out isn't enough?

2007-07-09 14:33:44 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

cut & run?

Isn't anything other than a clear Bush victory in Iraq considered "cutting & running" according to him? (& since his Surge is already a failure) how can a US Commander in Chief cut & run from a war?

Or is Bush use to cutting & running like he did with the Vietnam war?

2007-07-09 14:33:05 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

I thought they learned a lesson from Vietnam, but I guess not. When you are battling insurgents, it takes a long time to defeat them. I vaguely remember Democrats during Vietnam saying withdrawing would not hurt us and we could still be successful. The troops came home to ungrateful morons spitting at them and the war turned out to be a failure because we pulled out of Vietnam and the North took over the South. They lost their buddies in a war that would have been worth it had it not been for the poor public opinion and pressure from Democrats to withdraw. If we withdraw from Iraq, Baghdad will be taken over by a thug that will make Saddam look like a saint and Iraq will be more unstable than it is right now. If we stay there, we will make the insurgents frustrated that we are not playing their game and we will stay until neccessary.

2007-07-09 14:31:15 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-09 14:28:59 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-09 14:25:08 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous