Don't you think Congress should quit playing Bushs game and move for an impeachment?

Question

Is Bush trying to stall for time or is Congress letting them stall? Should the people of the US stand up and take their country back. Would that make you feel patriotic?

Answer 1

gomany- you need to get a clue. When the administration refuses to turn over requested information to the congress we elected to represent us - that is treason (what a dumb*ss). I defineately think they should both be impeached...At very least it would make the US a tad more crediable than we are now.

Feel patriotic you ask? I served two tours in Iraq. I would feel patriotic if I saw some justice to these two nimrods in office getting wealthy while they run out the clock on a failed war.

Answer 2

Impeach Bush.

http://impeachforpeace.org
http://www.democrats.com

Answer 3

Congress is not pushing the issue.

And Congress can do a lot more, a lot simpler, than going all the way for Impeachment.

For example, refusing to obey a Congressional Subpoena is Contempt of Congress, and Congress can cite the aides or other White House staff who refuse to comply, without needing to go the Impeachment route.

Congress just won't stand up for itself.

Answer 4

They aren't going to move for an impeachment without proof of undeniable criminal activity. It's the only way an impeachment will succeed, and as of yet they don't have it. Considering the talent the White House has for protecting their backs I doubt if they will be able to do so. It's not an endorsement by me of George Bush, I think the man is the worst President in my lifetime and I'm an old bat. I'm just looking at it realistically.

Answer 5

No it will cause a false flag. Remember this?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-972875032828177268&q=total+proof&total=161&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

I'm all for getting Bush out, but what would it solve? There is an agenda prepared for the US and the Democrats and Rebublicans are all in it together. Call me crazy but it is true. There is no difference between Hillary and Bush. They've been tag teaming us all along.

Answer 6

Hold on here.. Bush has made a few mistakes (and believe me, I'm far from Bush's biggest fan..).. but there is no reason for why Bush should be impeached. Bush didn't trick America into going into Iraq.. many people were fooled!

I am also going to take a guess that you think that Gore should have won in 2000... that may have been so, but the point is that the election got so out of hand that it went to a conservative-biased Supreme Court and no surprise... Bush got into office. However, there is no reason to why Bush should be impeached. He didn't break any serious laws.. he didn't lie about anything (or at least it isn't obvious he lied such as with Nixon and Clinton)...but Bush's got two years left. Things can't get too much worse, lol.

Answer 7

hey gomanyes, it's for congress to determine exactly what is meant by "misdemeanors" and "high crimes" as neither is explicitly defined

essentially a misdemeanor is defined as whatever the congress decides to impeach the president for

dead Marxist is similarly misinformed, a crime does not have to take place for impeachment to proceed, and what exactly is meant by "crime" is not defined

Answer 8

what Difference does it make? 99.9% of Washington is corrupt. All that will happen is that they'll put on a horse and pony show and avoid any real investigation.

In any event, We The People can make demands all we want, but our current Congress isn't going to do sh!t. You know it, I know it, We all know it.

Answer 9

No...Not at this time. This is a ploy the conservatives would like to see. He's a lame duck,(and a lame brain) anyway. To divide our attention on accomplishing an impeachment process would lessen the real and positive objective of electing a refreshing government into office.

Answer 10

Both bush and cheney should be impeached and imprisoned.