Politics - 19 June 2007

i voted for Mr. Bush--he turned into a backstaber on the illegal immagrants and the border--but on our fight against the terrorists i back him--i just wish he would turn or forces lose and let them run the WAR on Islam extremists and those who back them

2007-06-19 15:12:32 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why is Clinton so bad? Can I have some details? Thanks.

2007-06-19 15:11:43 · 22 answers · asked by ? 3

He says he's not running, yet, but come on, he can finance his own campaign. Is he worth a vote?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070619/ap_on_el_pr/bloomberg_politics

2007-06-19 14:54:14 · 20 answers · asked by Bestie 6

IF FORMER PRES.NIXON WERE HERE I WOULD LIKE HIS ANSWER TO THE QUESTION.ALL I CAN FIGURE IS CHEEP LABOR(NO UNIONS).AND POISONING OUR CHILDREN,PETS AND US.I THINK IT'S TIME TO CLOSE THE GATE.BRING OUR BUSINESS BACK WERE IT BELONGS. STEVE

2007-06-19 14:52:34 · 1 answers · asked by baldeaglewings 1

"Jack Bauer saved Los Angeles. ... He saved hundreds of thousands of lives," Judge Scalia said. Then, recalling Season 2, where the agent's rough interrogation tactics saved California from a terrorist nuke, the Supreme Court judge etched a line in the sand.
"Are you going to convict Jack Bauer?" Judge Scalia challenged his fellow judges. "Say that criminal law is against him? 'You have the right to a jury trial?' Is any jury going to convict Jack Bauer? I don't think so.

"So the question is really whether we believe in these absolutes. And ought we believe in these absolutes."

This is bizarre on two different levels;

1. Scalia is Mr "strict interpretation" of the constitution. There is no privacy because it doesn't state it, no wall of separation. An absolutist.

2. He uses a fictional TV show as an argument to ignore the law. Here's a Jack Bauer tidbit;

"Tell me where the bomb is or I will kill your son."


And this flake is on the SCOTUS.

.

2007-06-19 14:44:16 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-19 14:26:03 · 18 answers · asked by Lindsey G 5

what do you think? Will they again blame the Jews?
Why Muslims are murdering each others?

2007-06-19 14:25:59 · 9 answers · asked by Atlas 2

Mommie dearest

2007-06-19 14:23:56 · 39 answers · asked by lux s 1

2007-06-19 14:22:58 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Term limits were put in place to avoid popular presidents being in the White house too long. When a president leaves office, he (or she) is still addressed as Mr. (or Mrs.) President. The problem is not so much with Hillary as with Bill returning to the White house but in a different role i.e., the first Gentleman (say that about Bill C. without choking.) To me, Hillary's bid for the presidency seems like circumventing the term limit law and also a major legal precident in redefining marriage as something other than one unit. Of coarse, I expect an onslaught of Hillary supporters to bash me and not consider the issue, but I'll find a way to go on.

2007-06-19 14:19:57 · 20 answers · asked by shrugger 4

Is that what their neo-politicians and talk show messiahs keep telling them?

2007-06-19 14:19:02 · 6 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

Is it even repairable?

There is so much to deal with....

Iraq-our entire reputation in the M.E.........The NAU.......NAFTA & China.

So much to fix!

2007-06-19 14:16:24 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

in both foreign and national events, issues, and history? I say only the brightest and the best to avoid future presidents like Bush.

2007-06-19 14:13:56 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why does it matter?.Homosexuals are not sinners and the do not have a mental disease...they just have a different sexual preference. Why is that a big deal? Does it mean they should be treated as second class citizens and not be allowed to marry or have kids? I wish those homophobic people could experience being traeted the way that they are treating gay people in this country because maybe then they would reconsider.

2007-06-19 14:13:01 · 29 answers · asked by Lindsey G 5

you don't only get to veto or approve it, you get to CHANGE it if you like. fair? it doesn't matter. YOU'RE the decider... how many different twists can you put on this statement... "experts doubt that hostile life exists on mars".

go W go.

2007-06-19 14:11:48 · 16 answers · asked by patzky99 6

I know scumbag Rudy isn't, he doesn't have my vote. I've heard rumors that Romney is "pro-choice" as well, is this true?

2007-06-19 14:01:03 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

They have much higher legal abortion rates then the United States.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/25s3099.html

How about it cons? You go after all these countries, and we'll go after China.

"Should the tree-huggers go after China for all their pollution?"
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AktAhyRNA6cL.BugbkIt4P3Y7BR.?qid=20070619174056AAhmHel

2007-06-19 13:57:49 · 4 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3

I know Rudy Gulianni is on the Republican ticket, I doubt he will be picked to offically run. And does anyone think an American with Italian heritage will be allowed to become President?
You must be an arian protestant.
Whats funny is that Rudy is American just like George Bush and Bill Clinton no one ever mentioned what nationality they are. I am still curious to know what Hillary Clinton is, theres no mention of it anyhwere..
Hooray for the USA.

2007-06-19 13:57:21 · 11 answers · asked by lux s 1

Provided he runs, of course.

2007-06-19 13:54:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

If neo-cons are so intelligent, why do the bulk of revenue and future technologies spring from blue state workers?

2007-06-19 13:53:32 · 11 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

2007-06-19 13:49:51 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-19 13:47:42 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

more minorities and diversity then the almighty Clinton ever did yet they still get bashed for being racist and polarizing? Most Libs can't stand Condaleeza Rice and she is a black woman that holds an extremely responsible and powerful position. Clinton talked the talk..Bush walks the walk.

2007-06-19 13:46:40 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-19 13:43:04 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Supposedly the Republicans bankrupted the treasury deliberately. There was some goal they wanted to accomplish by bankrupting the treasury, what was it? What benefits will we see from bankrupting the treasury? Could there be any drawbacks?

2007-06-19 13:39:04 · 4 answers · asked by jxt299 7

so far, 8 years of broken promises

2007-06-19 13:31:18 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

Some cons said so, but provided no evidence... typical.

2007-06-19 13:27:58 · 12 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3

What would your reaction be?

2007-06-19 13:27:05 · 21 answers · asked by flushles 3

For the 9-11 conspiricists, Ive posted on here several times in a nice way, explaining the physics that counter your claim that a steel building has never collapsed due to a fire. Well no more mister nice guy. I'd like to know which one of you is going to call the families of the nine firefighters that were killed in a collapse of a steel building in S.C. and let them know that their fathers, brothers, and husbands didnt really die because steel buildings dont collapse.

2007-06-19 13:17:47 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

should conservatives boycott all bias organizations and promote objectivity?

2007-06-19 13:05:36 · 11 answers · asked by AB17 4