Some cons said so, but provided no evidence... typical.
2007-06-19 13:27:58 · 12 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
retiredfart,
Ted Turner does not even own CNN anymore. Get with the times.
2007-06-19 13:37:29 · update #1
"lib buster",
I checked your sources. They say nothing about CNN and Al Jazeera being owned by the same entity.
2007-06-19 14:19:16 · update #2
somebody is using utube as a source? that is worse than using wilkepedia or hanoi jane. why not quote a third grader who wrote a four sentence report on what their crackhead sister did on prom night. that is really a reliable source. prove it with a legitimate source. just because Montana raper ted married traitor hanoi jane does not make him a complete idiot, just a partial one
2007-06-19 13:36:05 · answer #1 · answered by don't plagiarize 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Last time I checked, they are not owned by the same group or person. CNN is owned by AOL/Time Warner. I am not sure who owns Al Jazeera, but I am sure that it is not AOL/Time Warner.
2007-06-19 20:44:22 · answer #2 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well isn't that what your side has done day and nite;Howard Dean wanted to look into Mr bushs' knowledge of 9/11,so here we go CNN an AL Jaz are funded by the Dem party
2007-06-19 20:34:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Both support the Democrats and Osama Bin Laden.
Osama Bin Laden translated into English is "Michael Moore." Moore owns everything on a screen in America and abroad.
Translated into Hungarian, it would be "George Soros" who owns everything liberal.
:-)))
2007-06-19 20:38:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
you do realize that it's impossible, right?
unless of course, someone owns 51% of time warner stock and 51% of al jazeera stock. but that's not the case.
2007-06-19 20:31:02 · answer #5 · answered by brian 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
LMAO , a lib asking a sensible question ?
2007-06-19 20:44:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Another lying conservative Bush lover!!
CNN & Al Jazeera ARE NOT owned by the same person/group!
2007-06-19 20:33:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋
Cons can't provide evidence
2007-06-19 20:33:44 · answer #8 · answered by Don W 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
It makes no difference. They both serve the same purpose.
2007-06-19 20:31:17 · answer #9 · answered by Gonzo Rationalism 5 · 7⤊ 3⤋
It's hyperbole.... it's just that their coverage is so similar.... much like Reuters...
2007-06-19 20:34:07 · answer #10 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋