Politics - 19 June 2007

like the 2000 in Florida? the 2004 in Ohio?

2007-06-19 03:41:50 · 24 answers · asked by George 3

The way that Cindy Sheehan or Danny Glover have done to the U.S. with Hugo Chavez?
Venezuela gives its citizens no right to free expression, yet libs embrace Chavez. We have more rights here, and libs hate it. Obviously, libs are not for our constitutional rights. They will deny it, but then they should be attacking Chavez, not Bush.

2007-06-19 03:41:49 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

A small gesture to memoralize one of their fallen heroes.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070618/od_nm/australia_goldengun_dc_1;_ylt=Akw9BxtuGs8h2QQP6bChWxgL1vAI

2007-06-19 03:36:20 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

The conservs asked and responded to a question about Hilary and her looks. I won't; go there with Bush, because he's rather old-fashioned looking in the face. So I will ask about his mannerisms instead. Don't get mad conservs; and no I don't hate him. I'm nether demo or conserv. Very succinctly, I think for myself.

2007-06-19 03:34:13 · 14 answers · asked by rare2findd 6

Fresh off CNN...

Despite the new Democratic congressional leadership's promise of "openness and transparency" in the budget process, a CNN survey of the House found it nearly impossible to get information on lawmakers' pet projects.

Staffers for only 31 of the 435 members of the House contacted by CNN between Wednesday and Friday of last week supplied a list of their earmark requests for fiscal year 2008, which begins on October 1, or pointed callers to Web sites where those earmark requests were posted.

Of the remainder, 68 declined to provide CNN with a list, and 329 either didn't respond to requests or said they would get back to us, and didn't.

Complete list at http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/interactive/allpolitics/0706/popup.congress.earmarks/pdfs/congress.earmarks.list.pdf

2007-06-19 03:29:02 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

so because he believes in this "global warming" idea, he makes a good candidate? someone please explain the reason.

2007-06-19 03:27:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-19 03:24:00 · 4 answers · asked by Mr. USA U 2

2007-06-19 03:15:08 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

And will they KEEP their promise this time?

2007-06-19 03:11:58 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

And quit posting questions on company time?

For the record, I'm still at home and coming in late. I have flexible hours.

I wonder what kind of responses I'll be getting...

2007-06-19 03:09:16 · 20 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3

So do unions hold any appeal for you? Where I live the unions are just an excuse for employees to receive a weekly paycheck without working. I know a company that the employee's use the shop for their own personal use or will sleep in their cars during work hours. They are protected by their union and don't care about working. Is this what the Democrats are wanting? Is this what they support? Is it all about the votes....Oh I think so.

What do you think?

2007-06-19 03:00:09 · 10 answers · asked by Jasmine 5

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6767427.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6361453.stm

Go to the websites. The violence continues to be unabated. I feel that something doesn't add up in Iraq.

How come is it that US says that Al Sadr is the biggest threat to Iraqi security? Even though Iraqi Shias are also suffering?

If the US has failed to fulfill its original strategy, then I believe that there is a reason to "divide and conquer".

The British used the "divide and conquer" strategy in pre colonial India.

2007-06-19 02:59:43 · 13 answers · asked by Zabanya 6

I'm appalled. I just asked three consecutive questions about votes that Fred Thompson cast while a Senator, and most of the responses I got were, "Where's your proof?"

First of all, look up his voting record, and there's your proof.

Secondly, the fact that you would consider casting a vote for a former Senator as a candidate for President without knowing how the candidate voted on the issues (whether or not you actually agree with that vote) is really disturbing.

So that poses the question, "How much do you know about your Presidential candidates?"

Do you research their stand on particular issues, or do you simply cast a vote based on what column their name is in on the ballot?

And how much of your own ideals must be reflected in theirs in order for them to earn your vote?

2007-06-19 02:57:32 · 15 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6

2007-06-19 02:46:42 · 23 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6

2007-06-19 02:46:04 · 11 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6

Explain your answers, please.

2007-06-19 02:44:58 · 24 answers · asked by tangerine 7

Why is President of the United States of America George W. Bush a respectable leader all over the United States and the World?

I believe the reason why President Bush is a respectable leader is because people see he stands up for what he believes in and he remembers to speak the truth.

2007-06-19 02:44:28 · 21 answers · asked by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7

2007-06-19 02:43:08 · 10 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6

I know that this is ancient history, but I've always been curious. After all, when Tony Blair was so gung ho in his support of Bush and the war in Iraq, it made him very unpopular with a lot of the British people. In fact, I remember that shortly after the beginning of the war, I saw some Brits on TV who said that they definitely weren't voting Labour in the next election.

By the way, I am from the US and I am NOT a Bush supporter!:)

2007-06-19 02:42:29 · 16 answers · asked by tangerine 7

Or are we here just for the hackery and trolldom?

2007-06-19 02:42:09 · 7 answers · asked by ? 6

2007-06-19 02:41:49 · 4 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6

As an American who recently traveled to England, I was shocked to learn that the Brits had removed discussion of the Holocaust from their history books.

Why are Brits afraid of Muslims?

2007-06-19 02:40:16 · 12 answers · asked by Toby Keith 2

We are constantly at war...cannot guard our own borders and are 8 trillion dollars in debt.

Go USA......whooooosh!

2007-06-19 02:34:49 · 13 answers · asked by Roscoe R 1

It was written in the early 1980s after the Federal Government and the evil private entity, the Federal Reserve, spent over a decade (Nixon, Ford & Carter) destroying our currency and economy throughout the 1970s until Ronald Reagan and Paul Volcker cleaned up their mess.

Lee Greenwood's song was a song of pride for our country even after losing his family farm. Soon our nation will become bankrupt due to spending trillions fighting Neo-con wars and because of the $87 trillion in unfunded welfare schemes (FDR / Social Security; Bush - Medicare RX & Medicare / Medicaid LBJ).

Bush (41 & 43) and Clinton's assault on American sovereignty through various treaties subverting our constitution and democracy will soon lead to a dissolution of the United States of America.

Hopefully, God will bless the USA and bring an American president who loves America and is concerned with the future of our nation though I am not holding my breath.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RssIN3ustUw

2007-06-19 02:31:07 · 7 answers · asked by Jason A 3

Why do they not refer to Obama as the Novice Senator from Illinois, or Hilary as the crazy Socialist Senator from New York? How is this not Liberal Bias?

http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2007/Jun/19/br/br5201473986.html

2007-06-19 02:27:28 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

How is their approval rating? NOTHING can get lower than Bush's approval rating, right?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18612770/

2007-06-19 02:26:36 · 9 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3

As an incumbent President of 8 yrs is prohibited from again being President, can the Vice President and President switch roles and run?

2007-06-19 02:15:28 · 16 answers · asked by roe j 1

means nothing?

When the vast majority of scientists make official statements supporting it, it DEFINITELY means something. It's not like a vote from the general population. It is a scientific consensus (from guys with Phds on the subject) based on the evidence.

Scientists do their research. They publish their work in scientific journals. Other scientists read those journals and try to replicate the results. If they cannot replicate the results, the theory is debunked or modified. If they can, it is strengthened.

This is called PEER REVIEW. It is a major component of the scientific process.

So again, when a theory stands the test of time, through years of peer review, it DEFINITELY does mean something.

2007-06-19 02:15:01 · 12 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3

2007-06-19 02:12:28 · 5 answers · asked by Page 4

OK, the Muslims are mad again.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070617/india_nm/india303487

Britian knighted a guy who supposedly wrote bad things about the Muslims. So what do they do? Argue like normal people? No, they issue a death warrant for this guy.

So, in other words, this is how these Muslims feel:
"How DARE that man call us violent! Kill him!"

I still believe that most Muslims are OK, but every day that feeling weakens. We have crazy Christians, too, but they aren't threatening to kill people! Crazy Christians have blown up, what? 6 abortion clinics? Muslims blow up more than that every day!

So what is it? Are all Muslims crazy, or just some Muslims REALLY crazy?

2007-06-19 02:09:52 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous