Formerly limited to the realms of political science and feminism, whether female presidents are less likely to involve their country in wars is a topic that is gaining more and more momentum. This is true, in particular, in light of the 2008 Race on the White House, highlighted by the candidacy of U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton. Already the electorate of a number of countries has taken the historical step of electing a female president, including that of Chile, Finland, Germany, India, Ireland, Liberia, Mozambique, New Zealand, Switzerland and The Philippines. Now, it seems the world's currently most powerful country is or might be making a bid to join this still exclusive club.
Do you put any stock in the notion that a female chancellor, president or prime minister is less likely to engage her country in a war? Would the fact that a particular presidential candidate is female influence your decision to vote for her? Explain why or why not.
2007-10-21
17:45:58
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Chris
3