Other - Politics & Government - October 2007

Could it be that they are the same money grabbing bastards in politics?

2007-10-20 07:29:18 · 14 answers · asked by its him again. / 1

Historians agree that we are due another WW. When will this happen? Who will be the major players? What specific issues will spark WWIII? Will the USA be strong enough to win? If a major battle ground is the USA, where is the safest place to hide out in the USA? Should we learn wilderness survival? If the safest place to go is another country, which country is the safest to go for Americans with families and what language do we need to start learning and/or teaching our children? Should we learn Chinese, Russian, Arebic, and Korean also as a defence (during WWII the Jewish prisoners who knew German had an advantage)? Will American foes use nuclear weapons? Will we? What war tactics will the other countries use against us? I am not a doomsdayist, but I am realistic enough to realize that the USA will not stay a super power for ever (Rome fell, Spain fell, England was and now isn't, Germany tried). Is there any one who thinks that we will stay a super power for all eternity?

2007-10-20 07:10:19 · 13 answers · asked by Lilith 2

...a country which clearly admits it has over 300 nuke war heads & is ready too use them!....or a country that has done nothing against international law (NPT).and says that is only wants nuke for peace

2007-10-20 06:46:30 · 13 answers · asked by D-one 2

I realize that I will get a LOT of crap for this, but even if you dissagree, I want you to be open minded about it, and actually think before reacting. Please, NO insults to ANYONE, especially if its political. If you dont agree, than dont answer!!!

I saw something online that made me think, it said something about the army being terrorist with more money. Heres what I thought:
People from other countries came to our country and flew a plane into a building, and have used bombs on our troops. They do this to try and force a way of thinking on us, that most dont agree with. We call the "terrorists".
Then, we go over to their country, bomb them, attack them, and kill many more. Then not only do we try and force our way of thinking upon them, but our system of government too.
We call ourselves "liberators".

Does that make sense to you??

With the use of logic, wouldnt we just be terrorists with more people and a bigger budget?

2007-10-20 06:22:25 · 8 answers · asked by shouting is better 3

This is not a ? about Bill or Hillary or any other politicans beliefs...this is not a ? about what you supported or felt 4 years ago...this is a simple yes or no answer please no politicking.... CURRENT (non-biased) public opinion polls show that 12% of the public support the President's current policy on Iraq.

2007-10-20 05:50:32 · 13 answers · asked by Stephen T 1

their political voice has died

2007-10-20 05:47:33 · 18 answers · asked by canada1usa0 5

.... since Rumsfeld and Rove left office?

He seems a bit more humble and conciliatory, ... or am I just hoping?
Opinions?

He certainly is paying more attention to pronouncing words correctly.
'The terroris ... ttt....zzzz' (Full marks for trying)
Although 'nuclear' still has him beaten.

2007-10-20 03:05:01 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

I.E. spending on people who would likely rather be dead but making you pay for it. It was your time that earned you that money so if they wast ethe money they wasted your time.

Or wasted your life, neat hugh?

2007-10-20 03:02:33 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-20 00:44:29 · 16 answers · asked by ♥SPARKLES♥™ 5

I found it.

It was behind the oregano.

2007-10-20 00:01:54 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-19 22:52:27 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

and when did a majority take over the individual rights?

2007-10-19 18:07:39 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Examples:
Evolution, literature (books like Harry Potter and others)

2007-10-19 18:04:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I ask about those three languages mentoned above, because they are the most widely spoken in the world. German is a waste of time, because most Germans speak English. French at least is spoken in some African Countries...

Or do you believe that the world should learn English and Americans should not bother?

2007-10-19 17:22:34 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does "it" refer to flag or republic.

"To the republic for which the republic stands"

"To the republic for which the flag stands"

2007-10-19 17:05:57 · 8 answers · asked by cresudek 2

Secondly, If Jesse Jackson Calls This Free Speech, And Music And Movies Use The Word, Why Does This Domain Censor It When It's Typed, But Honky Is OK To Type Here?

That Is Very Odd....

Is It Ethnocentrism, Or Flat Out Racism Towards Caucasians By This Domain?

This Is An Honest Debate, No Racism Implyers Need Answer.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071019/ap_en_ot/music_nas_album_title

2007-10-19 16:52:13 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

And how many children with no education living in poverty will want to be terrorists?

2007-10-19 16:50:23 · 5 answers · asked by Ktcyan 5

take over Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria, & Lebanon. Divide up all the oil, equally, get rid of all the nukes, get rid of Al Qaeda & set up a "peacekeeping" force to keep the "peace" in the Mideast & rule it kind of like the Ottomans did for hundreds of years. (which the Arabs really didn't seem to mind all that much)

Kind of like what Bush Sr. did with the 1st Gulf war only instead of leaving the multinational "peacekeeping" force would stay forever.

Everybody would have plenty of cheap oil, no more nukes, no more Al Qaeda, war on terror would be won. If anybody has a better idea let's hear it.

2007-10-19 16:39:42 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

those ppl on the street playing music and getting tip money
is the legal? (canada)
what happens if like a group of gr 10 do that?
lol just wonder- might what to try it out see how it feels

2007-10-19 16:34:36 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

and don' give me that "it's a user based" bs

2007-10-19 16:29:38 · 6 answers · asked by charlie the 2na 3

He called himself the Black Avenger and was on the radio for awhile. Excellent talk show, excellent man. I really valued his opinions and his integrity.

2007-10-19 16:25:33 · 3 answers · asked by Sara 4

(A)The british admitted defeat and allowed the french to have their land back east of the mississippi
(b)England and France recognized America as a independent country
(c)The French were allowed to settle into canada and establish fur trading posts
(d)The american army was offcially recognizec as the most powerful army in the world

2007-10-19 15:17:49 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

george bush lied to invade iraq, he admits it now. He passed the patriot act to bypass citizens constitutional rights. He lied about his desire to catch/kill bin laden. he wants to open our borders to illegal immigrants and he denies children healthcare. Doesn't that make him a two-faced lying criminal?
Also, if he IS guilty of all of the above... shouldn't he be tried for his crimes in a federal court of law?

Oh, and I don't wanna hear that 'bush is a hero' or 'your a liberal' or 'your a terrorist'. It doesn't phase me and it shows your lack of true opinion on the matter.

2007-10-19 15:04:17 · 25 answers · asked by psychotick 2

I keep hearing lots of comments how Americans are so dumb and how they believe everthing their media tells them. Perhaps it's true. But are you telling me that out of this whole world, Americans are the only ones who beleive everything thier media tells them? I'm sure there's media bias in every country, but for some reason it's mostly the Americans who get criticised for 'swalloing eveything they say' Nobody's perfect you know.

2007-10-19 14:55:48 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bidding was won by a rich fat cat Republican, if they were taxed at a fair rate, think they'd have that money to bid?

2007-10-19 14:28:10 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am a Viet Nam combat veteran. I did earn my Combat Infantryman's Badge, Viet Nam Campaign Medal, Expert Rifleman's Badge, Unit Insignas and a Purple Heart for being shot through my right lung. So, those are keepers I did earn. But I have a number of others, that I will say were not really earned and even in service never wore. Fact with the other medals is there are others they should have been awarded to, many dead. No one witnessed their deeds though and I was undeservedly in the limelight. So do I send them back with a letter or just throw them away? It's been 40 years. My father who was at Omaha and WWII threw away his medals shortly after discharge. All of them. He had the same reasons but also disgust and contempt for the government needlessly wasting lives. He was in a Sherman tank division, far inferior to German tanks. And knew better ones could have been made. At Ohama, none made it onto the beach.

2007-10-19 13:25:04 · 9 answers · asked by genghis1947 4

Plz explain seperately, thanks for answering!

2007-10-19 13:19:56 · 1 answers · asked by ladybug 1

I looked it up and it said it was to listen in on other peoples conversations, but I not sure its right. It is for my ammendment sheet that I had for homework and I finished the whole entire thing , but this question and when I answered it I just wanted to make sure if I was right or wrong and if i am wrong what is the right answer.

2007-10-19 13:06:04 · 5 answers · asked by ILOVEMYBIKE 1

Earlier today, I answered this persons question. I did not find it racist, I thought the questioner was asking a legitimate question. However, several people appeared to take offense at the question.

Does it make you racist to wonder and ask why certain folks in the black community do what they do?


http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApsCFxaTxAyKOARYPNGkfELsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071019082755AAreciF&show=7#profile-info-ZcgImygmaa

2007-10-19 12:59:45 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

"A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.

There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited."

2007-10-19 12:17:54 · 9 answers · asked by Jamil Ahmad G 3