Sorry I tuned out when he kept changing his 'policy' for the umptyumpth time. All the while saying we were staying the course.
So heres my answer:
NO
2007-10-20 05:57:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by justa 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Answer: No, I will explain my answer:
FORGOTTEN DREAMS
The People of the United States of America fought a cold war against the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact forces because they promoted the use of internal passport, belief that the State was more important than the individual. The Former Soviet Union and its allies were seen with disgust, because they reserved to themselves the right to detain any person at their convenience for investigation; because they created a penal system that used concentration camps or Gulag where alleged enemies of the State where INCARCERATED, TORTURED until a confession was obtained. They don’t believe on the Miranda Warning on just cause to imprison them and people have the nasty habit of disappearance on the streets.
The State had the right to audit what you read and to check on you solely because you were from an ethnic or religious group that has the gall to differ with their policies or opinions.
We also criticize the patronage and corruption of State owned systems.
After 50 years the United States clobbered that system to death.
Yet fifteen years form now we live on a system where to board a plane a strange can check your personal and belonging, where the state can legally ask a librarian what books you read.
We live on a system with Gulags of their own on places like Cuba, Africa and the Middle East. We had allocated to our leaders the power to arrest a person declare it an enemy of the State and torture him or her.
We have become our enemies.
It’s time to take a good look at ourselves and ask if we are proud of what we have built.
Our forefathers fought from Kasserine to Iwo-Jima for freedom yet we behave like the Fascists they beat to submission.
2007-10-20 08:43:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pedro I 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No -- there is no valid reason to spend hundreds of billions of dollars occupying a country that is in the middle of a civil war -- when the vast majority of the people there don't want us involved -- and when we have nothing to gain by being there.
Iraq costs us -- in lives, in money, in resources -- and we get nothing for our efforts -- it's a bad investment, and both fiscally and politically unsound as a business practice.
2007-10-20 05:57:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't support any policy of the current administration...
2007-10-20 05:58:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by peach1355 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I support the surge and the continued stay in Iraq.
2007-10-20 06:03:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
They wanted Bush to go to rehab but he said "NO NO NO"...then he invaded Iraq.
2007-10-20 06:08:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by charlie the 2na 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No I figured he has been bumbling his way along ever since he decided to invade!
2007-10-20 05:55:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by honestamerican 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
No. Any educated person knew when he was going in that is was going to be a monumental failure.......like he is.
2007-10-20 05:56:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mezmarelda 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
He has a policy?
2007-10-20 05:53:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
simple enough?
which reminds me....what policy??? I always figured he randomly decided where to invade next.
how could support an inhumane cruel POINTLESS war??
2007-10-20 06:35:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by shouting is better 3
·
0⤊
0⤋