Yeah, that's it.
2007-10-19 15:11:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the splendid 2% very own lots of the wealth interior the country. whilst the government money initiatives that placed people to paintings, the economy grows. With our cutting-edge, depressed economy, the money that is going to the wealthy won't be in a position to be invested interior the U. S. - there is not any longer sufficient call for to make it rewarding. So, the money is going distant places. And, we've the challenge that our cutting-edge tax equipment transfers wealth from the poorest ninety 5% to the splendid 5%. So, the wealthy get richer, the poor get poorer, and the economy is broken whilst the splendid tax costs are decreased. at the instant, the splendid a million% will pay at a decrease tax fee than the subsequent good 9%. Buffet mentioned that his gardener has a miles better tax fee than Buffet has. Why do you help wealth circulate to the richest of the wealthy people?
2016-12-29 19:03:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
People call rich already pay the bulk of taxes in this Country. Instead of giving congress more money to spend we should make them cut spending. End the wasteful pork barrel and earmarks. If a business was run like the government was it would go broke in a month.
Oh and the letter could just as well have been bought by any number of "fatcat Democrats". We have quite a group of them, do you recall that Reid himself got a couple million on a nevada land deal?
2007-10-19 17:10:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
no, it does not, the rich already pay the most in taxes (liberals this is the truth from the IRS), why should we punish them because they are rich? Its like taxing White people more because more white people buy vacation homes.........because God forbid white people have vacation homes.
My point is you cant blanket this kind of stuff. If you but a $4 latte every morning does that mean homeless people can say you are not taxed enough? Doesent that go against the liberal motto that an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind?
In my opinion we need a flat tax, just get rid of the IRS and make everyone pay a federal sales tax on goods, therefore the more the rich buy the more money they put into the tax system, and then illegals and tourists cant evade the tax either. Therefore your taxes every year will be directly proportional to the quality of life you can afford. No more dirty tax tricks by the rich to evade the system, and no more overburdening the middle class with half of the load.
2007-10-19 14:40:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ancient Warrior DogueDe Bordeaux 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
No, it just shows that they have big hearts and a sense of humor. No where that money is going, into a fund to help deceased police officers and US troops families, also Rush matched the total, so 4.2 million is going to the fund. So shut up about them being to rich and greedy.
2007-10-19 16:02:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, it shows people are PISSED OFF that the libs distorted and lied about what was actually said.
As for fair taxes, get rid of whacko social liberal programs FIRST, then a flat tax on 15 % across the board is FAIR to everyone ! Libs...quit picking our pockets !
2007-10-19 14:55:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by commanderbuck383 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Ah and here we go. Just because you havent figured out how to make money doesnt mean other people havent. Try going to school for something aside from social work. Then maybe you will make a little money.
2007-10-19 14:34:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Yeah, lets have no more income taxes. Let's just have sales taxes & luxury taxes. Sure, that'll work!
2007-10-19 14:53:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by mstrywmn 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
hey GENIUS..check your facts, it was a charitable organization and what it shows is the sytem works just fine. it takes up where government SHOULD leave off.
2007-10-19 15:13:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
2⤊
2⤋