take over Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria, & Lebanon. Divide up all the oil, equally, get rid of all the nukes, get rid of Al Qaeda & set up a "peacekeeping" force to keep the "peace" in the Mideast & rule it kind of like the Ottomans did for hundreds of years. (which the Arabs really didn't seem to mind all that much)
Kind of like what Bush Sr. did with the 1st Gulf war only instead of leaving the multinational "peacekeeping" force would stay forever.
Everybody would have plenty of cheap oil, no more nukes, no more Al Qaeda, war on terror would be won. If anybody has a better idea let's hear it.
2007-10-19 16:39:42 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No no no no and no to More death- those countries have their own problems and problems with each other, and to rule like the Ottomans hell NO they had Sharia Law (Arabs didn't mind it Why cause its their law too!) and that was above anything even though the Christans and the Jews had their own courts. The Peace keeping forces wouldn't be able to maintain the peace if that were to happen because they'd be busy filling up body bags.
2007-10-19 17:06:27 · answer #1 · answered by sChNiTzEl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Indian has about the third-4th greatest and maximum effectual military contained in the international. Pakistan is nowhere close to the right 10, so whoever thinks Pakistan is on the right 10 of the biggest armies contained in the international, are idiots. Pakistan many times chooses a nuclear warfare because it had chosen before till united states prevented this. Ever because then, Pakistan were coming up nuclear bombs reasoning it as 'nationwide safe practices' although the actual reason become to throw them at India. India has united states, uk and something of the united international locations on that is back. although, Pakistan has China, Japan & Russia in the back of it. So that is a confusing question, yet a logical and straightforward warfare with out alliances being braught in or nuclear guns might want to intend India might want to likely win.
2016-10-21 10:50:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's easy. Russia, US, China, & India would then need to fight each other for the total control that each one of them want. The goal is not for everyone to have plenty of oil. The goal is that only one should have complete control over the oil fields. Greed is gripping the world. Oil conglomerates & all the businesses associated with oil have a monetary throathold on the world. And they are squeezing. The sad part of this is we have technology now that could all but eliminate the need for oil. In the case of the USA, the oil industry owns congress & they are blocking any real development of other energy sources. With the unbelievable profits the oil companies are reaping, I predict the oil companies will buy the other developing energy companies.
2007-10-20 01:35:18 · answer #3 · answered by peepers98 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. China and Russia are too strongly allied with the middle east.
2. Peacekeeping force? Great load of good they're doing in darfur.
3. This may be considered Genocide.
2007-10-19 16:48:22 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Mojo Risin' 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Leaders Have Mudered 250,000,000+ Humans To Date And Counting. I'm Just Not Interested, I Have Beer To Brew.
2007-10-19 16:57:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Superpowers have different interests and they cannot just agree to invade Middle East. More often than not, they take sides in order to sell arms to countries involved in the war in exchange for guaranteed supply of oil.
2007-10-19 16:44:11 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
By peacekeeping force do you mean UN troops? Do you trust the UN after they lined their pockets with Iraqi "oil for food" money while Iraqi children died and the US got blamed?
2007-10-19 18:27:51 · answer #7 · answered by angrygramma 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nukes. Genocide.
2007-10-19 16:43:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
When I was young and heard about suicide bombers (in the 70s) I couldn't understand that ideology and talked to my mom about it and she told me that their culture is so very different than ours that is why if we ever started a war with them it would never end and that's why we would never start a war there because that was common knowledge, I guess it wasn't to GW, his mom should have told him! Violence begins where knowledge ends!
2007-10-19 16:55:55 · answer #9 · answered by Ktcyan 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
we have no right to go into someone elses country and dictate what they can and can not do. eventually the world will run out of oil so what then
2007-10-19 16:49:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋