Other - Politics & Government - July 2007

I know this is going to sound crazy here, but bear with me...

A group of radical muslims were brainwashed in Madrassahs mostly in Saudi Arabia, where children from pre K to 12th grade are taught to hate infidels & to glorify suicide in the name of allah.

They are recruited by this group called Al Queda and given money and marching orders to carry out a mission to take over planes and fly them into buildings !

Knowing fully well that ultra liberals will take their side as any assault against the capitalist model is a good thing in their mind, these muslim dudes know that their actions will cause widespread fear and disruption followed by division between those that will recognize their actions for what they are; sick twisted mass murder, and those that want to divide the country and ultimately change the country in the most radical fashion possible.

Crazy right? But it just might be true!!!!!!!!!!GASP!

2007-07-27 10:13:44 · 12 answers · asked by ? 1

I am.

2007-07-27 10:08:15 · 17 answers · asked by RP McMurphy 4

Some people in Yahoo Answers have floated the idea of amending the constitution so that Arnold Schwarzennegger could run for president. Currently, as someone born in a foreign country (Austria) he can't. Woud you still support doing so if Arnold was a Muslim?

2007-07-27 10:05:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

We have a president, by his own admission, doing warrantless wiretaps. We have a president who has issued an executive order to cover up the facts of Pat Tillman's death. That same president, lied to us and the world about Iraq.

If anyone can continue to side with and support our criminal president, they are the conspirators, not me.
President John Kennedy was the first to warn us of people trying to take over our way of life. He used the word conspiracy. JFK was a great man and a great President. I would much sooner trust him than this criminal we have now.

The ones wearing the tinfoil hats are the neocons and Bush supporters! Come on, folks, it's all over the media, in the newspapers and on the internet. Take it off your hats so the truth can get into your head!

2007-07-27 09:51:56 · 16 answers · asked by Dick W 3

Flight 93 was intended to crash into WTC 7. That tower, like the two towers that fell was set with demolition charges to bring the tower after it was hit. When the tower was not hit, those responsible for the attacks couldn't just remove the charges given the heightened scrutiny around the site. So they decided to "pull" the tower.

This is just my own conjecture. I'm not interested in proving it. I'm not even asking anyone to believe it (heck! I don't know the truth of anything that happened, myself). So those of you who tend to get angry when the "official conspiracy theory" is challenged, don't get all upset. I just want to know if this explanation has been considered anywhere else.

Thanks!

2007-07-27 09:47:34 · 16 answers · asked by Joe S 6

Is this the worse tandem of President and Vice President to serve office at the same time?

2007-07-27 09:39:12 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

A Rotherham mother-of-two was refused the morning-after-pill because the Muslim serving her at Lloyds Chemist said he opposed the drug on 'religious grounds'.

What do people think about this?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/south_yorkshire/6049750.stm

2007-07-27 09:16:51 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous

When jet fuel merely ignites the fires--it doesn't make the fire itself anymore potent than any other fire. And we know sky scrapers completely ENGULFED in fire have been left to burn out by themselves--no magical melting of steel or pulverizing of concrete occurred.

2007-07-27 09:10:16 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Have you seen Loose Change -- the video which reveals that our own government pulled off the 9-11 catastrophe in order to forward an otherwise stillborn neocon agenda?

DON'T MISS THIS VIDEO! You don't want to be left out of knowing about one of the greatest crimes in U.S. history.

Here it is on Google Video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7218920724339766288

"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." -- J Edgar Hoover (former head of the FBI)

2007-07-27 08:46:21 · 13 answers · asked by Trevor S 4

Is it because Bush is really a Hitler-like dictator and criticism is not welcome?

2007-07-27 08:42:53 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've been thinking and I realize that I know nothing about our government, except for the "freedom" and "equality" part. What's going on up there, as far as Iraq, new laws, the president, conflict, whatever. What's is going on?!? Who are we trying to protect America from and why, who's a threat, who's our ally . . . WHAT do we stand for?

2007-07-27 08:27:10 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

"In the [next two decades] hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. At this late date nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate..."

2007-07-27 08:02:41 · 5 answers · asked by the_defiant_kulak 5

Someone emailed me this article, I thought I'd share. Please, no bloody noses from the kneejerking.
****************
How Will Humanity Survive
The Capitalist Threat?
By Jason Miller
7-26-7

A few days ago, one of my closest friends hit me with a heavily loaded question.

"Are you a Communist?" she queried.

To which I replied:

I do not belong nor militate in any formal communist party in the U.S. Nor do I belong to any other political entity or party. Furthermore, I do not subscribe to a specific doctrine, ideology, or dogma. My allegiance is to my core principles and values, which are premised on honesty, justice, humanity, responsibility, critical thinking, open-mindedness, egalitarianism, compassion, a belief in a Higher Power of my understanding, and many of the teachings of Christ.

2007-07-27 07:31:35 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-27 07:11:22 · 15 answers · asked by J.R. 2

while I was in the U K on business I noticed the abominable dental hygiene in that part of the world Might this be the reason for the declining birth rate? Or could it be the effeminate males?

2007-07-27 06:19:09 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you knew precisely how to reduce public debt - then eliminate all public debt - then reduce all forms of taxation - then eliminate all forms of taxation - while still paying for essential government services and create government (at the local, state and federal levels in the United States) that are funded without either debt or taxation (perpetually) and do all of this legally would you support or oppose it and why? What do you see as the benefits of having no public indebtedness and zero taxation?

This applies to all forms of taxation (income, sales, fuel, property and the other 40-something forms of taxation that exist including drivers license fees) at all levels of government. Again, considering all of this is done legally.

2007-07-27 06:04:40 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Afterall, this is the same governments who public schools teach you that a millions of white men would fight and kill each other, brother against brother over a couple hundred thousand black slaves, in 1865! Suuure.

2007-07-27 05:45:19 · 13 answers · asked by Ted Kennedy 2

Millions of Americans are loosing their jobs due to companies moving overseas. We need to bring jobs back to the American people.

2007-07-27 05:44:00 · 17 answers · asked by Wildroze 4

If so, do you support social security reform?

-Social security taxes a higher percentage from lower income workers (13% on the first $90,000/year, 0% on income after that)

-By NO projection will there be enough for today's young workers to retire at a reasonable age. Today's children can just forget it.

-After 70 years, the government has zero dollars to show for this 'retirement account.' Private investments with interest would have doubled the principle at least four or five times - allowing a LOT more money to be available for those who need it AND it would provide capital & liquidity to the businesses that support us with jobs, goods, and services.

-Private retirement accounts are regulated by law and if a corporation treated it like our government treats social security, they would be prosecuted and have their assets seized (Enron)

So, do you support an abuse on the American working poor that is more horrific than any corporate corruption scandal, or do you support change?

2007-07-27 05:42:17 · 6 answers · asked by freedom first 5

which government is "We the People`s oversight over corporations. Or we are the government.

2007-07-27 05:34:12 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-27 05:34:00 · 18 answers · asked by nancy_marzola 2

Are they the military and the govt and federal employees???

2007-07-27 05:12:23 · 28 answers · asked by juanes addicion 6

2007-07-27 05:00:15 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-27 03:41:43 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Having been a super power for a long time and thus being responsible towards the rest of the world in many ways,has it been able to discharge them adequately with respect to world peace, spread of democratic norms and practices,human rights and economic well being of the poor.Kindly be brief and support your statements with facts and figures and in a totally unbiased manner.

2007-07-27 03:36:53 · 6 answers · asked by brkshandilya 7

Having been a super power for a long time and thus being responsible towards the rest of the world in many ways,has it been able to discharge them adequately with respect to world peace, spread of democratic norms and practices,human rights and economic well being of the poor.Kindly be brief and support your statements with facts and figures and in a totally unbiased manner.

2007-07-27 03:36:06 · 7 answers · asked by brkshandilya 7

Of course, I'd be slapping myself. But I'm sick of reading libs this and cons this. Or worse, neo cons. Don't people realize labels solve nothing?

2007-07-27 03:21:08 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you know?

2007-07-27 02:15:58 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

in the 1993, was a massacre in waco, texas, by america goverment policia. why america kill their own people innocent? just like china murder their own people innocent in the 1989 in tianman square. do you think?

2007-07-27 02:01:53 · 9 answers · asked by snakeinaburger 1

Has there ever been a politician who ever pulled a "Robin Hood" type of move at the expense of his/her career? If its so impossible to "accomplish" what politicians are supposed to as far as advancing their country in the right direction, and end up lying and being bought off, etc...why not make the first move and do something illegal that this country will benefit from?

2007-07-27 01:58:32 · 2 answers · asked by cpc26ca 1