Bush & Cheney:
here is why:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_presidential_campaign%2C_2004
:)
2007-07-27 09:47:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by recycled thoughts 4
·
7⤊
0⤋
Bush and Cheney - pretty much.
A distant second: Nixon and Agnew.
A decent man(of few in the repub party), prez Ford(unelected for sure) may have given the repubs some dignity, but Nixon 'nixed' any chance of that, even though Ford would never had been prez, per se.
Jimmy Carter - decent man to this day, but a weak prez - got elected by default - any decent dem would have won in '76.
After 1/2 a day, I see that the repubnuts are gettin' hammered !! That's good news because even THEY know the truth. Nixon, 41, 43 - repubs all, Reagan wasn't as bad, but he was a phoney - the USSR was 'done like dinner' before his famous speech to Gorby !!
2007-07-27 18:25:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Oh no, no longer even close. *Aaron Burr (our third vice chairman): In an 1804 duel in Weehawken, N.J., he shot and killed former Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton, a Founding Father and Federalist Papers author. In 1807, he replace into charged with treason for allegedly masterminding a plot to attack the Spanish colony of Mexico; some claimed he additionally deliberate to unlock the Union's Western states so as to sort his very own empire. Now this guy relatively sucked.
2016-09-30 22:24:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. That would go to someone like Herbert Hoover, and his Vice President, Charles Curtis, who presided over the stock market crash, and the economy spiral into the Great Depression.
Interesting tidbit, VP Curtis was the only person elected to the Vice Presidency who was not a white male. He was a Kaw Indian.
History will look back on the Bush administration as relatively successful, because our history books generally only look at domestic achievements, and the economy has grown significantly, in spite of 9/11 and a protracted military conflict. Our education system has faced some reforms, the tax cuts that were enacted in 2001 have had a significant impact on the economy, violent crime is declining, etc. Really, the only issue that he will face lasting criticism for is how the administration handled the issue of illegal immigration.
2007-07-27 09:52:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bryan F 3
·
1⤊
4⤋
Nothing here to be proud of , the worst ever. I was a baby during Truman,Eisenhower than Kennedy, Johnson,Nixon,ford,carter,Reagan,Bush,Clinton,Bush. Have you notice most have been republicans no wonder we are in this mess.
2007-07-27 10:12:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by margie s 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
WIthout a doubt, Bush & Cheney are the worst ever.
2007-07-27 10:31:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Summer 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
According to a poll taken by historians Bush is the worst president, and tongue-in-cheek, they named Cheney as the 2ND worst president!
I agree with them. Nixon (Watergate) and Reagan (Selling arms to our enemy Iran and Iran /Contra), follow closely behind!
2007-07-27 09:55:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
Keep your spirits up, I know it's terribly frustrating. Make sure you just don't post here but also that you use that anger to write to your Congressmen.... and more than just once.
Who knows if they're the worst. It certainly has occurred to me, many times. Can you measure such a quality?
But you know, what does this say about the American public. We voted for the "tandem." And even after the stolen election in Florida. Does this make Americans the worst voters ever?
Think about it. Americans get what they deserve, just like in any democracy.
2007-07-27 09:50:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Wave 4
·
4⤊
4⤋
For his lies, manipulation of powers, disregard for congress, and secretiveness the worst administration is bush/cheney
2007-07-27 11:19:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by wi_saint 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
Worst: Bush/Cheney. See this survey of historians:
http://hnn.us/articles/5019.html
2007-07-27 10:11:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋