Other - Politics & Government - June 2007

Today, for the second straight times, the president vetoed the stem cell research bill. The detail of the information could be located at: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/287553/bush_to_veto_stem_cell_bill_for_the.html

2007-06-20 15:59:23 · 34 answers · asked by TOBBY 1

i saw a really bad accident today and i just wanted to know if there was a place i can go to, to see if they actually survived just to clear my conscience. and no i didnt actually witness the event just the aftermath.

2007-06-20 15:55:55 · 1 answers · asked by amon2365 1

2007-06-20 15:36:07 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

During the times of kkk the black panther which are the same as kkk went legal and created this church that is total grear to the black family only. Even the pastor of that church told a newsreport about this that the head of their church is into the black panthers. So how can you say that he is christian when Jesus had no respect of persons and have love toward all people. This church doesnot walk according to the words Jesus said.

2007-06-20 15:13:15 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

One says "Ask not what your your country can do for you..."

The other asks the government "What have you done for me lately?"

2007-06-20 14:10:18 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm for having a (PATRIOT) for PRESIDENT not the slugs that want to give this country to the illegals!

2007-06-20 13:47:48 · 11 answers · asked by abigail t 1

best everything; people, religion, food, military, human rights, cities..what do you think?

2007-06-20 13:01:28 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Q: How many Bush Administration officials does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A: None. There is nothing wrong with the light bulb; it's conditions are improving every day. Any reports of its lack of incandescence are delusional spin from the liberal media. That light bulb has served honorably, and anything you say undermines the lighting effect. Why do you hate freedom?


I got this in an email, thought it was pretty funny.
one question though, does anyone else get a feeling of dajavue? I think I have heard before!! ;)

2007-06-20 13:00:32 · 19 answers · asked by shouting is better 3

you know the one Skull n Bones, it's called. The one he didn't want to talk about on Meet the Press. The one incoporated as Russell Trust. 322- The Order of Death located in "the Tomb" on Yale campus.
So does Bush need the skull for his rituals like at Bohemian Grove or is he just not giving it back to be a dick?

2007-06-20 12:57:07 · 11 answers · asked by guiseppeamore 2

I heard one of our local radio ranters saying that the "evil liberals" thought up this amnesty plan. Looks like Lil 'w' is going to pass the buck on this one, too.

2007-06-20 12:56:42 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Today, President Bush denied congress' proposal to advance stem cell research. What exactly is stem cell research, and why is President Bush so against it?

2007-06-20 12:40:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Something's fishy here...

2007-06-20 12:31:51 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Ok, 9/11 happens. 4 commerical airliners either crashed / vanished / vaporized.

Now, initally all the passengers on the passenger manifests from all 4 airliners are accounted for (friends, releatives, etc.). Perfect - all names match.

Then the F.B.I. says those manifests are wrong - and provides us w/ new manifests. Which now have 19 names added.

Then 6, 7, or 8 (?) of the mass murderers step forward as being alive and well. Either their ID's were lost, stolen, or what have u.

Then the F.B.I. states, they legally can not determine exactly how many mass murderers there really were on 9/11.

Then the F.B.I. states, they've uncovered the real identity of the missing mass murderers and it does added up to 19 men. However the F.B.I. refuses to give us missing guy's names. Did I miss the F.B.I. report (or any other) that gave us the new names? Can someone give me the link to show me this new F.B.I. name list?

thx!

2007-06-20 12:24:50 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

There should be rights specifically associated with citizenship.

Non-citizens (whether illegal or legal) should not have the same rights. They should not be entitled to benefits of our government.

I say let people come to the country. Let them pay taxes for 10 YEARS before they can become citizens. Before that if they make even ONE mistake regarding our laws--go back to where you came from.

2007-06-20 12:21:07 · 3 answers · asked by Scott L 4

I am trying to understand. How Would pulling out help us and the Iraqis? As far as I can see, its happening the same way as it did in Vietnam. people wanted us to pull out and we did. we lost the war and the commies took over because of it. hundreds of people died,not Americans. nothing good came out of it last time. so why do you think something good will happen this time? if we pull out know the terrerists will win. hundreds more will die because we left. if you thinks its bad now, what do you think it will be like for them with out hardly any protection? if we leave the terrerists will take over and then we will still have to deal with them later on when they continue to attack us wether or not were still their. if we pull out, every thing we have been fighting for will fall. So I want to know, How would it help if we pull out of Iraq?

2007-06-20 12:11:52 · 14 answers · asked by star wars fan 3

Because it sure seems to be the favorite past time of the pro-Bushies!

2007-06-20 12:11:11 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think the Royal Family plays and important role to the UK? How do you see the position and function of the Queen or the King in the modern world?
Do you support the idea or are you a republican, and why?

2007-06-20 12:09:52 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-20 11:44:56 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bush is hated by the left and the left agrees with him on this one. BUT the conservitives thiink by allowing all these Mexicans will increase the Left's voting mass to ensure their socialist intentions.
What is Bush doing? He's a solid policy guy, so what are his motives?

2007-06-20 11:10:36 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

all the majority want is to control persecute and kill one another. How is that good for the country? So by doing away with democracy people wouldn't get their way and everyone would be much better off, at-least there would be a chance. With the majority in control its gaurenteed that life will remain sh't at-least there would be a chance otherwise.

2007-06-20 11:03:08 · 7 answers · asked by F your world 1

and would u move there?

2007-06-20 10:57:31 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

in a country where there is welfare, free h.s., democracy, freedom of speech, medicaid etc. what is the excuse of a poor American?
why is it that so many immigrants come here from europe and asia, hold spots in top universities and take in good jobs. these immigrants came from countries who couldnt give them democracy, medicaid etc, thats why they left. if the immigrants can make it without those luxuries, why cant americans with those luxuries?

2007-06-20 10:40:50 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-20 10:39:18 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-20 10:06:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

They never commit crimes "OR" on welfare. They are very educated and they have respect for all. Why is that?

2007-06-20 09:07:59 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-20 08:36:11 · 6 answers · asked by Sangria 4

It is about how people deal with racism. It takes place in Los Angeles. It came out 2005 and Paul Haggis directed it.
Just wondering how you guys feel about the film. In addition, let’s stay smart here when answering.

2007-06-20 08:20:19 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

what was the salman rushdies satanic verses about

2007-06-20 08:09:28 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

It would not take much effort. One afternoon of air bombardment would probably do it and they could eliminate Castro for good. I know that the Cuban people would be extremely relieved and grateful to be free so why not do it? Sure, some people are going to criticize the US for invading a smaller country but those people don't have to live the way Cubans do. I know it’s unfair to ask the US to take on the responsibility of eliminating all the dictators in this world and continue to interfere with other countries’ affairs but unlike in other countries that the US has invaded, Cubans do wish someone would help them obtain their freedom. Nothing would make them happier than for someone to come in and eliminate Castro. They can’t do it on their own since the Cuban government has absolute control over their lives and they have no weapons available to them. I think the US would benefit from a free and democratic Cuba too since they are so close to US soil. Also, it’s well known that Castro has strong ties with Chavez and Ahmdinejad. What if the Iranian president is able to build WMD and give Castro some? Should we wait until that happens to act?

2007-06-20 08:04:08 · 23 answers · asked by 3cats 2

2007-06-20 07:46:38 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous