Ok, 9/11 happens. 4 commerical airliners either crashed / vanished / vaporized.
Now, initally all the passengers on the passenger manifests from all 4 airliners are accounted for (friends, releatives, etc.). Perfect - all names match.
Then the F.B.I. says those manifests are wrong - and provides us w/ new manifests. Which now have 19 names added.
Then 6, 7, or 8 (?) of the mass murderers step forward as being alive and well. Either their ID's were lost, stolen, or what have u.
Then the F.B.I. states, they legally can not determine exactly how many mass murderers there really were on 9/11.
Then the F.B.I. states, they've uncovered the real identity of the missing mass murderers and it does added up to 19 men. However the F.B.I. refuses to give us missing guy's names. Did I miss the F.B.I. report (or any other) that gave us the new names? Can someone give me the link to show me this new F.B.I. name list?
thx!
2007-06-20 12:24:50 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Evan - everything I've stated is 'factual'. It's been in the mass media. Why do u say it's false?
2007-06-20 12:41:55 · update #1
Why do people equated asking questions will disrepecting the dead?
If u ask questions about Iraq, then ur disrepecting people who died in Iraq? This makes no sense.
2007-06-20 12:43:54 · update #2
I've been looking for a story about this as well.
How could Mohammad Atta's passport have been found within hours of the tower's collapse, unscathed on top of the rubble?
If several of the passports that got those men on the planes were really stolen and their rightful holders alive and well, who were the guys on the planes?
Therefore, is it perhaps part of the scheme that we should believe that the attackers were Saudis when perhaps some were not?
What about the many allegations of the hijackers' funding coming via the Pakistani Secret Service?
Why didn't the 9/11 commission consider any of these questions?
2007-06-20 15:12:05 · answer #1 · answered by oimwoomwio 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm a data analyst for a large corporation. I have no idea what working for the government is like, but here in corporate drone land, it's increadibly hard to get even a couple of mid level managers to pass on the same facts, however careful you are to give them exactly the same set of data in exactly the same way, with exactly the same analylsis.
So, sure, the airlines could be confident that thier passenger manifests are accurate, and it could take the FBI multiple tries to figure out exactly which people on that manifest were using fake or stolen identies and who they really were, and whether or not they might have been involved.
This is real life, not a detective show or a mystery novel, the peices aren't going to all neatly fall into place at the end.
2007-06-20 19:49:31 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Originally the FBI released the names of 19 persons they "believed" to be the hi-jackers. This was in the FBI press release of 9 Sept 2007. You can find it at http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/092701hjpic.htm
However to say that only one person has a specific name is ludicrous. Just because you are named John Smith, doesn't mean you are the only one. Anyone attempting to find a conspiracy can find it anywhere, with enough searching.
Granted the FBI might have made some mistakes in the identification of these person, but that the act was committed is not in doubt. That it was a terrorist act is not in doubt.
And please don't rely on just the kooks on the net for your information.
2007-06-20 19:51:53 · answer #3 · answered by hardwoodrods 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Support any of that. I believe our government may have been complicit in the horror... but these particular charges are brand new. You got any links or other evidence that any of the guys are still alive? Or any of the rest that you said?
2007-06-20 19:35:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
more likely to get a plausible explanation for the collapse of WTC7-- but if it's fiction you like then just check the Commission Report.(it won't win many prizes though)
2007-06-21 21:39:17 · answer #5 · answered by celvin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it was really the Saudis, why hasn't the U.S. gone after them?Blindly believing what you are told has lead us to the mess we are in.Bush's approval rating was really low as it is now. Hm mm, I wonder were the next "attack" will be?
2007-06-20 20:04:44 · answer #6 · answered by oldhag 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Most of what you have stated is false making it difficult to answer whatever "questions" you have asked.
2007-06-20 19:29:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
FBI
Federal Bureau of Idiots
who cares what their list says they suck.
2007-06-20 19:31:17 · answer #8 · answered by Beauty&Brains 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
9/11 happened idiot. And you are disrespecting the memory of a lot of dead Americans and insulting still grieving families.
2007-06-20 19:41:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋