Celebrities always ask about saving needy children. This has been the spotlighted topic it seems. It's important to aid the needy, I agree, but whose really responsible for them?
First, I'm going to ask you: If parents have a child, but can't support that child are they irresponsible? If we're talking about a teenager in the US then the immediate answer is yes. So why then does noone think of the parents in third world countries as irresponsible? It is more their fault than anyone else in the worlds for bringing them into existence.
Starvation & poverty is the worlds way of saying, I'm reaching my population limit. The world can only sustain so many people, and with a growing population there has to be starvation, and poverty somewhere eventually. It's a matter of economics and scarcity.
Letting nature run its course may not be the humane decision, so here's my real question:
Shouldn't the solution be for these people in third world countries to STOP having babies?
2007-02-13
09:33:52
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Rush_Informer01
2