Hawaii, American Southwest, Chile, Iran, Iraq
Just to name a few
Is it really in the United States best interests to overthrow other nations regimes?
2007-02-13 08:14:00 · 6 answers · asked by Yahoo Sucks 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Anyone who seeks to destroy the USA should be removed before war takes place, war is not good, but any country not willing to fight, or just percieved as weak, will be attacked, and even overun, by nations who want whatever that nation has. Yup, they have some oil in the Middle East, but they don't have a lot of things we do, so they want to take over our country, one way or another. Doing a regime change will always make you look bad, allowing that regime to go on, build up a military and a coalition that attacks you, always looks stupid for letting it happen. Damned both ways, glad it's not my decision to make.
2007-02-13 08:22:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No - it just breeds new more passionate enemies!
Dialog and diplomacy are lost.
The only regime change we need right now is to flush Washington and replace them with real Americans that are for the people and our Nation!
When America comes second to foreign policy - there is a problem!
2007-02-13 16:41:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You forgot to mention 1400 Pennsyvania Avenue--the only place it really matters to us. As long as it's not to rape and pillage the natural resources of a nation state, I'm all for the deposition of brutal regimes provided there is a humanitarian cause behind U.S. involvement.
2007-02-13 16:27:02 · answer #3 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only when they threaten us, and provide for terrorists. How is Hawaii a bad example.
2007-02-13 16:41:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not too swift on Geography, eh?
Or history.
2007-02-13 16:19:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Were you always this stupid or did you make a special effort today?
2007-02-13 16:23:08 · answer #6 · answered by Brite Tiger 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋