English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Politics & Government - December 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

How do nations unite in time of war?

2006-12-14 11:19:32 · 9 answers · asked by TheOnE 1

i think its great idea ;0 + it will help us fight terrorism and they might stop killing americans if we give them what they want :)

2006-12-14 10:38:01 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-14 10:10:14 · 13 answers · asked by anger remain 1

“A celebrity has just as much right to speak out as a regular person.” Sure, they have the right to state their opinions but, not worldwide. Celebrities aren’t like regular people; they are famous and they can persuade people into thinking like them.

I know many of you dont agree with my views, but im writing a persuasion speech and need examples.

Ex: Ronald Reagan, Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Dixie Chicks....

any other examples? thanx.

2006-12-14 09:26:26 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

September 11, 2001 was devestating non-the-least. And Michael Moore made Bush supporters feathers ruffle by claiming he had evidene of a Bush sponsored terrorism to our own Americans. But what has become of it. His claims were quickly dismissed and found to have way to many holes to validate his stance. There is something wrong here and I am curious to what you think about this... and further more if Michael Moore is involved more in the cover op of a Bush lead strike on America to establish more of a Police State and control over America and it citizens.

2006-12-14 08:52:44 · 10 answers · asked by Shad M 1

2006-12-14 08:44:37 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I want to know what left and right means in these political views names , like left-liberal , very-left-liberal and also libertarian.
and also centrist :)

2006-12-14 08:36:26 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

him as a person or his policies?

2006-12-14 08:36:10 · 12 answers · asked by AFwife 2

with almost all of them actually paying to put their program on is it their message? are they making sense? why do conservative talk radio suceed since this is a market driven business, why are more people apt to listen to conservative talk radio after all the country is basically 50/50

2006-12-14 08:27:22 · 15 answers · asked by Ynot! 6

2006-12-14 08:15:59 · 4 answers · asked by dee dee deet 1

on WHAT planet are those morons dwelling?!?

2006-12-14 07:43:15 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-14 07:37:34 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-14 07:27:51 · 10 answers · asked by YA!!! 3

2006-12-14 07:24:40 · 9 answers · asked by IRunWithScissors 3

2006-12-14 07:12:22 · 31 answers · asked by michelle112785 3

in his PJs, confined to his cave, and making those ridiculous videos? Do you FEEL BAD? If so, what are you doing about it?

2006-12-14 07:03:57 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

By win- I mean Iraq is stabilized. So what do you think? Cut and Run? More troops? Just wondering what ideas were out there

2006-12-14 07:00:34 · 15 answers · asked by michelle112785 3

Virtually anyone who is a homeowner gets bombarded every day by junk mail, spam, TV and radio ads associated with mortgage re-financing this has resulted in Americans re-structuring their loans in massive (record) numbers allowing them to use their property like ATM machines.

Because the cash freed up by these actions have generated thousands of dollars more than the income tax cuts, how can Bush supporters claim that the strong economy was the result of Bush's policies?

2006-12-14 06:59:51 · 9 answers · asked by Timothy B 3

I heard this morning that a democrat senator had some sort of brain-bleeding and will take a long time to recover from surgery. And that his republican governor will have to appoint another senator to take his place- undoubtly a republican one. So now the senate will be 50/50. What does this mean for the US? Is every bill just going to be a stand off?

2006-12-14 06:57:58 · 13 answers · asked by michelle112785 3

No, this question is not for the Weak Sisters; it's for fans of the President. Personally, I just LOVE the fact that he doesn't give one whit what the left-wing wackjobs think; not at all like that waffling Little Billy Clinton who was so desperate for EVERYBODY to like him.

As per the usual: all incoherent "answers" by the other side will be reported.

2006-12-14 06:57:04 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

If Joe's great great great grandfather worked hard,and started a business,

then joes great great grandfather took it over and built the buisness up,

and then joes great grandfather built it up even more,

and then joes grandfather took it public, and now joe makes 6,000,000 dollars a year becaue of it, should we take it away from joe??

2006-12-14 06:53:20 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Was this all orchestrated by the Evil Dick Cheney or has the CIA been up to its old tricks again. Help me out here - who is at fault for the Senator's ailment?

2006-12-14 06:45:12 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

are you aware that the following can happen:

person X makes more money than person Y.

After taxes, person Y has more money than person X

If a tax break corrects that, is that one of those "tax cuts for the "rich"?

Notice i did not use numbers so some of you can say, "he's not rich , so your question is unanswerable"

2006-12-14 06:40:29 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

For localities like city agency who deal with contractors, can they have a lump-sum budget, I mean without detailed lines especially for salaries? what govern the budget requirement or standards?
I am asking that because a contractor has ask my employer, a local government, that they cancel the budget lines and have a lump sum budget and let the details at the end of the year. Is there any rule, directives that prevent that?

2006-12-14 06:40:24 · 1 answers · asked by mab 2

in terms of wealth.

I want to know how to distinguish who is getting a tax cut because they are "rich" and who is getting one becuase its 'fair'.

2006-12-14 06:26:21 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Here is a scenario, tell me if this is considered a "tax cut for the rich":


Joe and Mike are both widgetiers. they are widget experts, who make the same hourly wage.

Joe likes to work about 25-30 hours a week. He likes the free time he has left to go fishing, camping, and various activities. At the end of the year, Joe's income adds up to be 30,000 dollars before taxes.

Mike likes to work 10-12 hour days, and works the weekends whenever possible to collect overtime. He rarely does anything other than work. He averages about 80-85 hours a week. Mikes income at the end of the year (due to overtime wages) is about 85,000 before taxes.

Tax time rolls around.

In year 2010 Joe paid 3,000 dollars in taxes. (This comes to about 10 percent of his income

In year 2010 Mike paid25,000 dollars in taxes, since he is in a higher tax bracket. (this comes to about 30 percent of his income)

Now a new law only makes mike pay 20,000 dollars (around 23 percent of his income)

2006-12-14 06:19:04 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have tried Tesco's and Sainsburys does anyone know anywhere in London I can go to buy a seat in the house of Lords!!

2006-12-14 06:06:12 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous

Volcanos are the biggest contributor towards greenhouse gasses which cause globalwarming. Now, reports show that methane gas from animals greatly overshadow those of transportation.

Global warming is obviously a natural occurance, so why can't these liberals leave nature alone?

2006-12-14 06:06:03 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers