Liberals, define "rich"?

Question

in terms of wealth.

I want to know how to distinguish who is getting a tax cut because they are "rich" and who is getting one becuase its 'fair'.

it looks like you liberals can't agree on anything.

Answer 1

Here's a another one:
Define "Livable Wage"

If somebody is alive, then aren't they already making a "livable" wage?
Does a "liveable" mean you can afford a house of your own? An apartment? Do you have to share your apartment with someone?
Does a "liveable" wage mean you can afford a care? What type? A Honda, a Chevy, a Lexus?


In answer to your question about defining "rich", every citizen that pays taxes (all income over $10,000) got a tax cut, so is everyone rich?

Don't expect any rational answers from liberals. If they were rational, they wouldn't be liberal.

Answer 2

Bill Gates
Warren Buffett
Carlos Slim Helú
Ingvar Kamprad
Lakshmi Mittal
Paul Allen
Bernard Arnault
Prince Alwaleed
Kenneth Thomson
Li Ka-shing

Answer 3

i'm a Libertarian, so I actually have a rather independent view. Conservatives commonly have self belief in upholding older moral perspectives, yet so a ways as authorities is worried, Republicans have higher this is length, even even with the truth that Republicans and conservatives are "adverse to" exapanding authorities. Conservatives are commonly seen because the operating class and the hicks in the sticks (human beings have that inaccurate even with the truth that, maximum "rednecks" are democrat right here in Alabama besides, because they prefer the entitlement courses). Liberals are seen as being concerned human beings and extremely open-minded (it is way less authentic than one may imagine even with the truth that, only take a check out distinct the liberal's solutions to this question). Liberals commonly want large entitlement courses. both have their faults and at the same time as it comprises politicians, they are all so screwed up it not often even concerns anymore. yet only because someone labels themselves as liberal or conservative, it would not propose they accept as true with each thing on their aspect of the fence. own journey can replace an excellent type of that.

Answer 4

Nice question. Liberals love to pick on the rich, but they can never really define the rich, can they?

Of course, when it comes to raising taxes on the rich, I bet they can define rich to easily mean the top 30 or 40% of taxpayers.

Answer 5

my definition of rich would be having enough money to do everything you need and want to do.but i don't know about the tax cuts.i guess poor people should get tax cuts because they are the majority of people and always need more money.but when President Clinton was in office we had higher taxes and a better economy so maybe we should go back to that style of taxing.everyone said the economy would get better from tax cuts but it got worse.

Answer 6

when people talk about the "rich", they are usually referring to the very rich such as the top 2% in income. I have never heard of anyone in that category complain of paying more taxes. Those people feel blessed that they even have this amount of income. It is the people that aren't even in that category that complain the most about higher taxes for the rich. why is that????

Answer 7

It is fair that the rich get richer because they get to make the laws which benefit themselves.
It is also fair to say the rest of us should receive tax crumbs because we acquiesce to these laws thereby insuring the rich will get richer.

Answer 8

Liberal definition - Anyone who doesn't need to worry about having enough money to pay the bills, always have plenty to eat and, in general, not have money-worries.

Conservative definition - Anyone who has millions of dollars and the likelihood of never being without them.

Answer 9

"Rich" - A common Anglo-originated first name. Short for "Richard." (Examples Rich Little, Richard Pryor, Richard Nixon).

Answer 10

Shaquille O'Neal is rich. The man who writes Shaq's paycheck is wealthy.