Do you think Michael Moore whitewashied the 911 conspiracy opposed to uncovering it?

Question

September 11, 2001 was devestating non-the-least. And Michael Moore made Bush supporters feathers ruffle by claiming he had evidene of a Bush sponsored terrorism to our own Americans. But what has become of it. His claims were quickly dismissed and found to have way to many holes to validate his stance. There is something wrong here and I am curious to what you think about this... and further more if Michael Moore is involved more in the cover op of a Bush lead strike on America to establish more of a Police State and control over America and it citizens.

Answer 1

Whole thing with police state, new world order are really too general and vague. 911 conspiracy is pretty weak theory too. There are lot of twisted information like the ones used to make WMD case for Iraq. Here's some examples.

Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ What they don’t say is that this BBC article is about confusion over hijackers’ true identities. It appears hijackers may have assumed someone else's IDs. Criminals using false IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.” That’s why the title put quotation mark around ‘suspects’ when it says ‘suspects alive and well.’

You can read this BBC entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’ Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears and have reading comprehension of sixth grader. This article is used to claim that hijackers are made up/fake people in this ‘conspiracy.’ Yes, it’s sad. Please read the entire article and learn something called CONTEXT.

Twin towers never fell at free fall speed as Professor Jones claims. He makes eye ball estimate and do not make actual measurements. Several have made calculations showing the towers fell close to free fall because of massive kinetic energy, but frame by frame calculation shows it does not fall at ‘free fall’ speed. You can actually see some debris falling faster than building is collapsing in some footages. Usually demolition takes almost month of gutting and preparation for much smaller buildings. Twin towers were not taken down with bombs as claim by some. http://www.debunking911.com

Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. Why would Silverstein, who is not familiar with demolition at all, use demolition slang to admit something so odd on national TV? That doesn’t make sense.

911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/ Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary. Lot of stories about gov shooting down flight 93, missile theories...etc seem to have originated from this.

Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building. Several light poles at near by high way were knocked down short ways from Pentagon. Did single missile swerve around in chasing after skinny light poles before hitting pentagon? Was it a big fat Tomahawk missile that is wide as commercial airliner’s wing span? Some cars were damaged too by the plane grazing over highways.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml

Many claim Pentagon had auto missile defense that could have shot down planes entering its airspace, but such project really never took full effect because of fear that civilian plane may be shot down and might pose danger to neighboring residents. Can you imagine some newly licensed pilot flying single engine Cessna into Pentagon air space getting shot down by missile or anti aircraft guns? Richard Clarke, former counter-terrorism official explained this. Ask him about it. How many times do you see planes go off course by accident? Gov officials didn’t want to endanger its own citizens for extremely unlikely scenario.

Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.

Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.

Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? The US went to war without UN Security Council clearance anyways and have taken military actions without UN clearance in the past. If we can go to war whenever we want to why kill 3000 people? Just for the fun?

Why would so many authorities make bold claims that reveal this so called 'inside job' if it is inside job? As 911 theory people claim. Did Nixon ever go on TV and say 'oh yea I bugged those suckers' before whole thing became public? Lot of 911 theory claims don't make sense. If you have secret plot to bring down buildings and disguise it as terrorism would you tell people about it on TV interviews or in public?

Answer 2

Michael Moore, the mummy of all pecker-heads! I examine the former day that Cuba did no longer coach his action picture appropriate to the Cuban well-being care gadget because of the fact the medical institution Mikey filmed replaced into no longer for the conventional Cuban. yet purely for top government officers and travelers!! Had the action picture been shown in Cuba the Cubans would desire to have lynched Fidel and Mikey on an analogous tree...:-)

Answer 3

Michael Moore just wanted to make millions of dollars from the death of 3000 American people on 9-11. He is an idiot.

Answer 4

I have often thought that he is a convenient tool for the Rupublican party. His movie was easily criticized and not well-researched. Furthermore, he sat central stage at the Republican National Convention and was the butt of every speech. He has only, in my opion, hurt the movement to oppose Bush. And concerning 9/11. his whole Bush was incompetent stance did sort of whitewash the nagging issues that stand out, such as the standown orderder given to NORAD. So you may very well be right.

Answer 5

Micheal Moore is an opportunist. He is in one business--to make money. He has distorted facts with clever editing to suit his own agenda. Micheal Moore is the lowest form of Humanity. He had a voice and wasted it trying to divide the American people.

Answer 6

Moore is a trouble maker and he hates Bush. It is his way of making money and that is all, lame entertainment is what Moore is all about.

Answer 7

I think people waste their time on Moore. His hypocrisy is wider than his waist; he is an uninformed charlatan with an agenda; truth means nothing to him.

Do some real research and ignore this doofus (i.e., Moore).

Answer 8

Well....this is a first......Michael Moore may be part of the "vast right wing conspiracy"??....HAHAHA

That porky liar is too dumb to think of something so devious.
He's just a fool.


**

Answer 9

I didn't see it. I don't watch anything Michael Moore does anymore.

Answer 10

No. He invented it.