English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Politics & Government - October 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

America was attacked by terrorists, either those in this current Bush regime or by those he blames, al Qaida.

What we do know is that Condi Rice was handed many red flags, and knew about the attacks that were iminent, but she either chose not to act on the threats or she simply has a very poor memory and forgot about them.

Bush was briefed several times about these threats, and he did nothing but read to little children. Gee - I wonder is he can actually read those little golden books. We all know he can't read a newspaper.

On 9/11/01 America got attacked, again with our pants down, but why was the entire Bush regime asleep at the wheel as well?

Could it be that the vast majority of the facts have been lost in yet another one of the Republicans infamous cover-ups?

2006-10-19 04:30:34 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-19 04:09:58 · 14 answers · asked by biffo911 1

http://www.spacetoday.org/Rockets/Spaceports/LaunchSites.html

2006-10-19 03:52:15 · 14 answers · asked by Rick 1

few headlines this october 2006:

Eleven US soldiers accused of murder in Iraq to stand trial.
Seoul warns against new nuke test.
U.S. troops in snipers' line of fire.
Bloody Baghdad forcing U.S. to rethink strategy.

dont just think... worry about them. feel the need to love peace.

2006-10-19 03:46:21 · 6 answers · asked by spn 2

that if you crawled up George W Bush's backside, you would bang your head on the soles of Tony Blair's shoes?

2006-10-19 03:45:13 · 19 answers · asked by Ellie29uk 3

Like the invasion to Iran ,Iraq......

2006-10-19 03:39:19 · 13 answers · asked by Akku 1

would you have to pay council tax?

2006-10-19 03:34:45 · 10 answers · asked by chicken 1

A. Buy A Bumper Sticker.

B. Go Against Popular Opinion and Ask To Bring Them Home.

C. Not Send Them To A Frivolous War Without Enough Troops & Equipment.

D. Joining The Military.

E. Make More Cuts In The G.I Bill.

2006-10-19 03:29:58 · 20 answers · asked by Do You See What Happens Larry? 5

Is God giving him bad counsel?

2006-10-19 03:29:10 · 17 answers · asked by Wassana L 1

Explain your logic.
please cite the source you got these from, if not just dont write anything, thanks A LOT!

2006-10-19 03:29:09 · 3 answers · asked by sexyback69 1

2006-10-19 03:23:52 · 19 answers · asked by bootylicious_1969 1

Hi people I just want to ask a quick question what is the real intention/purpose of the Iraq War and please dont answer if you think it is for oil it is much more bigger then that and it has been covered up so much that if we reveal it we will be lost it is because that was just a cover up just like how they did it with Saddam and also the Taliban in Afghanistan (it was for the opium that is what I belief), but if there is any link between Iraq and Babylonia please answer this difficult question.
Thank U and;

Bless People.

JFK:Dejaal El Arab.

2006-10-19 03:22:37 · 24 answers · asked by J. F.K 2

more help =) always appreciated!!!

2006-10-19 03:20:58 · 6 answers · asked by sexyback69 1

is it based on the way it has been done for years,the people, a dictator, or electted goverment official?

2006-10-19 03:15:42 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

than on the weekend which would incease voters turnout.

2006-10-19 03:13:26 · 5 answers · asked by Ynot! 6

Foreign Policy!! PLEASE HELP =o)

2006-10-19 03:09:42 · 5 answers · asked by sexyback69 1

The White House has repeatedly threatened to attack Iran under the pretext of halting the development of nuclear weapons. The development of nuclear weapons by Iran is something the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and inspectors have refuted as being untrue.

So is this latest news simply an escalation of the administration’s saber-rattling? An attempt to provoke Iran and create a Tonkin Gulf-like rationale to justify military strikes? Or is this actually the first step of planned military action against Iran, with the administration’s declarations of attempted diplomacy just as phony as they were before the Iraq war?

Military action against Iran would inevitably kill large numbers of innocent people, foster even greater hatred towards the United States, and bring international condemnation.

2006-10-19 03:07:20 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

to allow GWB to become emperor if it meant keeping Hillary Clinton out of the White House in 2008?

2006-10-19 03:05:28 · 5 answers · asked by Wassana L 1

from some answers I've seen here, it seems Americans are now comfortable with their government's round-the-clock spying?

- Would you accept a ban on public rallies?
- Warrentless strip searches at Wal-Mart?
- Troops stationed in your homes?

How about the confiscation of your firearms ...?

if your politicians said it was vital for the War on Terror

2006-10-19 02:51:26 · 11 answers · asked by Wassana L 1

duriduring talban rule the law and order was at its best and the forming of poppy(heroin)plant was stoped but now the law and order is at worst and the forming of poppy is at maximum.this is intetional or the nato forces have failed to control

2006-10-19 02:46:37 · 7 answers · asked by shahidshada 2

Are they trying to wipe out the black vote?

2006-10-19 02:36:49 · 11 answers · asked by Muhammed Loves Pork Rinds 1

2006-10-19 02:34:52 · 5 answers · asked by Badger 1

2006-10-19 02:13:14 · 20 answers · asked by Muhammed Loves Pork Rinds 1

fedest.com, questions and answers