The White House has repeatedly threatened to attack Iran under the pretext of halting the development of nuclear weapons. The development of nuclear weapons by Iran is something the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and inspectors have refuted as being untrue.
So is this latest news simply an escalation of the administration’s saber-rattling? An attempt to provoke Iran and create a Tonkin Gulf-like rationale to justify military strikes? Or is this actually the first step of planned military action against Iran, with the administration’s declarations of attempted diplomacy just as phony as they were before the Iraq war?
Military action against Iran would inevitably kill large numbers of innocent people, foster even greater hatred towards the United States, and bring international condemnation.
2006-10-19
03:07:20
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government