Other - Politics & Government - October 2006

history

2006-10-25 02:47:10 · 4 answers · asked by gemma r 1

Everytime I hear any of the countries, Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland they seem to be on top of an international list or another in pretty much everything!

So, how come we don't hear more about these coutries, then? Can't be that good, despite all the statistics and such. And where's the good ol' USA in these "studies"? Huh?

2006-10-25 02:34:14 · 10 answers · asked by dane 4

Not bad looking for a horse ..while reading many articles of Ann coulters irrational coments i cannot help but associate her for the facist Hitler wanna be that she is....I can rest assure that her ideology's really have no real political foundings...I am very much aware that she argues the very laws of this country that allow her to act out the way she does.....A christian that uses her faith to make profit....I am no Christian yet even I know it is wrong to profit of of Jesus!!!

2006-10-25 01:58:22 · 17 answers · asked by coopchic 5

Many conservatives like Rush Limbaugh have said some very hateful things about his condition.....I am personally all for stem cell research...it could save countless lives....

What are your thoughts on Rush Limbaugh....this guy is as Radical as Ann Coulter.....

2006-10-25 01:46:46 · 21 answers · asked by coopchic 5

How much would a P.I. charge per. hour?Say like one that lives in michigan?

2006-10-25 01:33:14 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

First of all sorry for my bad english I'm italian.
Some days ago I've seen an emission on tv which thesis was that some american's intelligence knew about air attack and had profited of the occasion to definitively eliminate the twin towers - all for economical reasons, to regenerate the US economy, etc etc. Lots of engineers have in fact studied the crash and have arrived to the conclusion that the towers have crashed more for explosive than for the hurt with airplanes.
Do you really think it's possible?

2006-10-25 01:23:07 · 26 answers · asked by pops 2

...when anyone mentioned how Bush's tax cuts only served the wealthy who did not need them? And now under Bush the middle class has virtually disappeared ! Who is warring on whom?

2006-10-25 00:47:38 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Dennis Hastert says the House ethics committee should quickly determine whether officials took proper action after learning of ex-Rep. Mark Foley (news, bio, voting record)'s overly friendly and salacious computer messages to former male pages.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061025/ap_on_go_co/congress_pages

I do not think that Hastert took the right action, since he knew about it for almost 3 years. Do you think that Hastert is trying to get away with the fact that he did not do his job or protect teens from Mark Foley's behaviour, advances and sexual exploitation of Minors?

2006-10-25 00:37:53 · 7 answers · asked by JC J 2

2006-10-25 00:34:40 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

theres millions of them,in the u.s. catch em and kick em out,

2006-10-25 00:33:59 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

letters from past political figures

2006-10-25 00:30:46 · 5 answers · asked by GEORGE H 1

2006-10-25 00:22:29 · 16 answers · asked by orsel 2

If not this week, how about next week,

2006-10-25 00:21:06 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-25 00:04:26 · 18 answers · asked by tulip 4

watching an old film with a missionary and the hero in some gold rush crazy town and the missionary says " i came here to help the indians but i reckon its the white man that needs the help". For me this sums up how i feel when white men (leaders of the Free World -sic ) goes into a country and culture they don't understand (and in some cases can't spell ) and turns it upside down and then claims it was all for their benefit. so my question is are these countries better off WITH or WITHOUT our meddling ?

2006-10-24 23:58:12 · 8 answers · asked by splinterfoot66 1

Alex can handle it.

2006-10-24 23:49:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

This would surely kill two birds with one stone.

2006-10-24 23:39:55 · 17 answers · asked by ? 4

is this possible?
it occurred to me that freedom could be quite dangerous:
- freedom allows any belief
- beliefs are perceptions of truth
- truth cannot be universally accepted
- conflicting truths result in conflict
- freedom allows conflict
- war results from conflict
i am not a nihilist, but suddenly its occurred to me that freedom may be more of a societal burden than a benefit.

1. is freedom dangerous?
2. does freedom jeopardize social construct?
3. does freedom serve as a barrier to productivity?
4. does freedom increase anxiety/fear?

2006-10-24 23:30:12 · 16 answers · asked by oracle 3

If not, then do you think this world-wide conflict could lead into such war?

Why?

2006-10-24 23:26:07 · 8 answers · asked by davegesprek 1

And I'm pretty sure Timothy McVeigh of the Oklahoma bombing can be. Jim Jones?

Home grown terrorists that are ignored in the current debate that argues all terrorists are "foreign" without white skin.

2006-10-24 23:23:51 · 11 answers · asked by  4

Cut and run? Stay? Phased withdrawal? 3 state solution?

2006-10-24 22:49:29 · 18 answers · asked by chad 3

2006-10-24 22:19:01 · 2 answers · asked by Allen 1

withdraw from iraq and afghanistan

2006-10-24 21:52:39 · 10 answers · asked by stefan 3

Of the Lib Dem's ever 'coming to power' and running the country?
Or will English politics be a bouncing ball between Labour and Conservative for eternity? Or could another party get in ther and take over Westminster?

2006-10-24 21:50:05 · 30 answers · asked by Part Time Cynic 7

Would Canada be a different today? Better or worse? Who should we blame or praise?

2006-10-24 21:42:59 · 1 answers · asked by diSota 2

2006-10-24 21:29:01 · 11 answers · asked by maximum 1

2006-10-24 20:46:17 · 5 answers · asked by airy023 1

Should the state be required to bear the cost of funerals and burials for dying inmates? Why or why not? This is very important! Thanks a ton!

2006-10-24 20:42:50 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-24 20:42:30 · 9 answers · asked by GOOCH 4

The Declaration of Independence states that we have a right to own private property, but that is not the law of the land. If the Constituion says that I have a right to own private property, then where is my private property?

2006-10-24 20:39:41 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous