2006-10-25 00:22:29 · 16 answers · asked by orsel 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Would UN be stronger than ever to play a decisive role in international politics? Would all countries be willing to deposit all nuclear weapons in their possession with UN? If so, on what terms and conditions?
2006-10-25 00:34:58 · update #1
UN can be made directly responsible to the ppl. Even at present nothing can materialise at UN forums without noddings of people's representatives.
2006-10-25 01:04:15 · update #2
Collective wisdom will prevail upon UN members. There is no doubt that with nuclear weapons with UN most of the politicians will now think in international terms rather than the present narrow regional vision. The Chief of the UN will be the most poerful person in the world. Would such a person be finally accepted by the people? May be that some political leaders come forward with the proposal to deposit some of their nukes with UN at the start. Would there be IMF like voting or quota system based on relative shares of NUKE reserves with UN. May seem attractive to nuclear powers while providing enough relief to others as well.
2006-10-26 19:00:35 · update #3
We would all be subject to the dictates of the UN as a one world socialist government.
2006-10-25 00:24:02 · answer #1 · answered by Eldude 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The UN is not answerable to the people so such a possibility is scarry to contemplate - the world would come to an end shortly I believe.
2006-10-25 07:42:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Full controll of UN is contradiction in terms. In other words the nuclear weapons will be out of control.
2006-10-25 07:34:20 · answer #3 · answered by roman_durbin2001 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Then the honest countries would no longer have them as a deterrent. They would fall into the hands of only the terrorists.
What, you don't think some nukes would still be manufactured illegally? Or that some would go "missing" in the process?
If you don't think that, you're hopelessly idealistic.
2006-10-25 07:25:56 · answer #4 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1st They would lose 10-15% of the missels in book keeping errors.
2nd 40% of the missels would never be found. Some due to incompentece most due to bribes.
3rd what ever little tin horn was in charge of the UN would then think that the UN was a world power.
I think it would be a disaster........not that it would ever happen I HOPE!!
2006-10-25 07:32:34 · answer #5 · answered by danzka2001 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nice idea but all of a sudden the unbelievable films with story lines of terrorist selling nuclear weapons on the black market, and kidnapping scientists, would come true.UTOPIA DOESN'T EXIST, PEOPLE ARE B*STARDS!
2006-10-25 07:28:12 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The U.N. is totally ineffective and dishonest. Once they did this the next step would be controlling the whole world for their own profit. Aren't you aware of all the corruption in that group and havn't you seen how opposed they are to the U.S.?
2006-10-25 07:28:10 · answer #7 · answered by Heidi 4 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
some corrupt UN officials, and there are plenty of that, will become very rich from selling parts of this nuclear arsenal to mad-dog dictators.
2006-10-25 07:29:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hell. The UN cannot supervise the money they control, I wouldn't trust them with a spitball, let alone nuclear weps.
2006-10-25 07:25:13 · answer #9 · answered by Meow the cat 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The world would end!
2006-10-25 07:24:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋