Other - Politics & Government - October 2006

Anthony Kennedy? I've looked but can not find and e-mail address or phone number, Any ideas?

2006-10-11 06:38:35 · 2 answers · asked by sqwirl_hater 3

2006-10-11 06:27:56 · 12 answers · asked by vini1 1

2006-10-11 06:22:08 · 10 answers · asked by liketoaskq 5

The Dems are saying that Foley never should have gotten so close to the pages. It was wrong for him to be working with people so young. Not to mention the whole creepy older guy liking young boys thing.
So why can't we ban gays from being Scout Masters again?

2006-10-11 06:21:19 · 14 answers · asked by Coo coo achoo 6

My fault, I worded incorrectly. Same question.

Just for a moment, lets stop mudslinging...?
Is anybody seriously worried about being nuked? Or is all anyone can think about is which party to blame? I'm actually worried for the first time...Its one thing to raise the terror level but another thing entirely to hear about Nuke testing. I was just wondering if anyone else might be a little concerned?

2006-10-11 06:16:55 · 16 answers · asked by Sticky 2

We invaded the middle east looking for weapons of mass distruction and didn't find any. Just oil.
N. Korea has said weapons, but we haven't offered them any sort of aggression, Why?

2006-10-11 06:16:27 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-11 06:12:30 · 6 answers · asked by zclifton2 6

right in his face. I think he got mad. I don't know what to do, should I send him a get well card or apologize?

2006-10-11 06:10:10 · 19 answers · asked by ? 6

I would say that it is minor. A few countries have nuclear weapons and some are more volatile and generally unstable than North Korea. Pakistan definitely comes to mind. And Russia could definitely be viewed as unstable. North Korea is simply testing the waters here. These types of things are nothing new. The Bush administration came out right away with a public stance but this would have occured during any administration. We have seen these things before.

2006-10-11 06:08:14 · 9 answers · asked by cannonball 1

2006-10-11 06:08:10 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

All I asked was if a particular "prophet" who founded a certain "religion" in the year 622 C.E. in Mecca, was indeed a pedophile, rapist, and murderer, who spread his twisted cult by force.

Aparently this violated "Community Guidelines."

What do you think?

2006-10-11 06:07:36 · 16 answers · asked by thealligator414 3

When will we wake up and reject these lieing ******* in the republicans and democrats, can't everyone see that they don't work for us anymore. They work for the multinational corps and special interest. And I don't know what to think of the republicans especially, just a bunch of lieing, smoke and mirrors, tax and spend *******.

2006-10-11 06:06:58 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Unions throughout history have played a major role in keeping some sort of equality in wages between the rich and middle class. Unions are the reason we have a middle class, as unions shrink so does the middle class. Below is part of an article by Henry Paulson, the Treasury secretary.
"But it seems likely that government policies have played a big role in America's growing economic polarization -- not just easily measured policies like tax rates for the rich and the level of the minimum wage, but things like the shift in Labor Department policy from protection of worker rights to tacit support for union-busting" - Full Article URL: http://www.nytimes.com

2006-10-11 06:02:55 · 13 answers · asked by Go Union 1

1 - Unprofitable.
2 - Highly-taxed despite the lack of profits.
3 - An employer that its employees love to work for.
4 - Employs only Americans.
5 - Never lays off a single worker - regardless of cause.
6 - Has executives who work for $1 per year.
7 - Pays its workers 50% above the average for comparable jobs in other corporations.
8 - Provides its workers (but not its executives who are already very well-paid) health care benefits that exceed what US Senators and Congressmen receive.
9 - Manufactures only appropriate, environmentally-safe and morally-defensible products.
10 - Gives no money to political causes and does not allow its employees to contribute to political causes either.

2006-10-11 05:57:49 · 4 answers · asked by Walter Ridgeley 5

I'm not understanding why a country with little influence and power would provoke the nations of the world with their piddly nuclear tests, then say that it's an act of war if we sanction them which is a relatively painless action compared to military action. Does this have something to do with their communist beliefs and what are they trying to prove? Do they want to start WWIII?

2006-10-11 05:44:09 · 13 answers · asked by ? 6

2006-10-11 05:40:51 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

That if a President is doing such a terrible job like the one we have now. that deligates from all the states can vote. and call for another general election. to replace .are keep the president.

2006-10-11 05:39:14 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

canada, united nations

2006-10-11 05:37:20 · 4 answers · asked by slurpee0625 1

It is common knowledge that the network news are biased in favor of ALL liberal agendas, yet dem supporters keep crying that there is a conservative bias.

Are these supporters lying, have they succumbed to the propaganda or are they trying to divert the truth as usual?

Have any of them read this university study? Why would they lie?

http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/groseclose/Media.Bias.8.htm

2006-10-11 05:35:21 · 12 answers · asked by rmagedon 6

Please - be honest, now; I just can't wait to hear what you REALLY think!

2006-10-11 05:34:25 · 14 answers · asked by Walter Ridgeley 5

2006-10-11 05:28:37 · 14 answers · asked by Walter Ridgeley 5

I lost track at 126

2006-10-11 05:21:41 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-11 05:20:21 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

If i was that one who will get the remote control of the world, first thing i'll do i'll punich everyone hurted at least one iraqi even if by speach. And I'll make iraq as it must be, a big country full of petrol and great nature that people can't discover cuz of the wars
What about you?

2006-10-11 05:19:25 · 11 answers · asked by Laith Attar 2

the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky case?
Thanks

2006-10-11 05:08:45 · 3 answers · asked by Joy_Brigade 3

While going through the various news sources I read daily I found about 14 different articles on terrorist activity around the world including Europe.

I am surprised that there is nothing about these on the network news in the US. Why?

Has the media forgotten that there are people out there killing innocent people and would be doing it here if they could?

Considering 911, you would think the network news would be all over these incidences of terrorist activity.

2006-10-11 05:06:55 · 5 answers · asked by rmagedon 6

Whatd i miss & what the H*LL is going on? I miss everything :(

2006-10-11 05:05:12 · 8 answers · asked by Baby Jack born 4/5/09 4

of mass destruction or don't they have enough oil to warrant occupation.? Maybe Bush can't get China's or Haliburton's permission to attack there ?

2006-10-11 05:04:36 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you think so, then please pray with me.

2006-10-11 05:01:50 · 14 answers · asked by Kalidas 2

2006-10-11 04:59:35 · 16 answers · asked by Champ 1