Many people keep asserting that Bush did not do anything wrong with his warrantless wiretapping program. Make your case. Explain using references to existing laws, cases, or legal theories why his admitted violations of FISA are legally justified.
Here are at least some of the relevant laws in question:
[50 USC 180x] http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/50/chapters/36/subchapters/i/toc.html
[18 USC 2511] http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/18/parts/i/chapters/119/toc.html
Make the case that he is not guilty. Not just by baldly asserting that as a conclusion. Make the legal case for the defense, and back up your arguments. Either disprove one of the required elements of the statute, or assert and prove an affirmative justification that is recognized by the law.
If so many people are convinced his actions are legal, read the laws yourself and make your case to prove your assertion.
2006-09-15
11:52:57
·
21 answers
·
asked by
coragryph
7