If the goverment, nor scientists, were and are not certain when a "fetus", (unborn child) is a "living human", then should the federal goverment avoid any involment in the topic and procedure? Shouldn't the goverment have, perhaps, allowed private abortion clinics and refused federal funding, since they were and are not certain when an unborn child is living?
Also, since abortion often and very much offends the religeous, is it Constitutional to force the religious to financialy support a procedure that contradicts their belief? For instance, should Christians be forced to financially support, (through taxes) federal abortions when they are religiously against the procedure?
Isn't it hypocritical for civil-rights activists, (pro-choicers, feminists) to fervantly defend the "rights of women" while violating the rights of the religious? Shouldn't these activists be against federal funding of abortions, which violate the rights of the religious?
2006-07-02
02:21:16
·
3 answers
·
asked by
man_id_unknown
4