English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Government - June 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Government

can sge groundb him??????

2007-06-19 21:33:06 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

They are cramming an Amnesty Bill down our throats as the wide majority of Americans vehemently oppose it. They are spending us head-long into financial oblivion. The national debt is approaching 9 TRILLION dollars. Our children and grand children will be debt slaves.They are "surging" us further into the Halliburton windfall meat-grinder in the Middle East. They have become bold and arrogant.

Recent words from the Decider:
“I’ll see you at the signing table"
“I won't take no for an answer"

So I ask you, "What are you gonna do about it?"



"

2007-06-19 19:52:08 · 10 answers · asked by GoldFever 4

2007-06-19 18:57:10 · 3 answers · asked by eight_ball8 3

There has to be a better solution than giving our money to a goverment that has been know to pay $500 for a toliet seat.

2007-06-19 17:53:30 · 8 answers · asked by Dina W 6

It shows that he is really unwilling to work with anyone and
it shows that he could care less what a majority of Americans
think about anything. But most of all it will help the downfall
of what the Republican party has become. You go Georgie
Boy. Oh yeah a question. Which kind of potatoe is Bushes brain made out of

a) Russet
b) Idaho
c) red
d) horse manure.

2007-06-19 15:22:26 · 5 answers · asked by trichbopper 4

It is apparent that the polititions of this country like to huff, puff and get re-elected. The serving President of the United States is guilty (self-profesed) of High Crimes and Misdemeanors.
How does the American public start impeachment proceedings? There must be a way... The founding fathers where patriots who would NEVER tolerate this abuse.
I know most Americans want to wait until 2008 and elect another lying (future) criminal. Let's impeach this one and tell the others to watch their P's and Q's.
The future of America (our children) is at stake.

2007-06-19 14:57:22 · 10 answers · asked by rick m 6

Did she have to purchase rights?

2007-06-19 14:36:25 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-19 14:18:30 · 8 answers · asked by Gypsy Gal 6

If you had a disease, and only one surgeon can cure you, would you ask that surgeon about his/her marital woes? Why would you care about the surgeons marriage?

2007-06-19 14:07:02 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean, Fidel Castro is the only national leader I know who is going to lead a country for over 50 years. All you need is good health and you should serve over 50 years as President or Prime Minister.

Even before term limits was instated, none of our presidents served over 50 years.

Why?

2007-06-19 11:17:31 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-19 10:07:39 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-19 09:43:54 · 39 answers · asked by Peter A 2

2007-06-19 09:31:48 · 6 answers · asked by krzyezzy 1

most of the 1,221 weather stations that the federal government uses to gather data on temperatures are improperly placed and records invalid data. This data is then used to predict global warming doom.. oh boy!


http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/weather_stations/
http://www.surfacestations.org/

2007-06-19 09:08:22 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

The American Civil Liberties Union has given their blessing to the public funding of Islamic footbaths at the University of Michigan, to let Muslims wash their feet before prayers.

The ACLU says it has nothing to do with religion.

This pleases CAIR greatly, because now the Islamic community won’t have to pay for them: Muslims won’t fund footbaths. And also because it’s another small step toward shari’a.

2007-06-19 08:56:48 · 18 answers · asked by Dina W 6

Portman has been in both George H W Bush's administration along with George W Bush's administration with a turn in between as a successful congressman from Ohio.

2007-06-19 08:53:36 · 5 answers · asked by ALASPADA 6

It seems stupid that the congress works on a bil to serve the American people, but just because Bush doesnt like it he can just veto it and all the work of Congress was for naught, to me, that is a dictatorship !

2007-06-19 08:40:30 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

the Budget Director is not the one.
nor is the Attorney General.
America really needs 2 resignations.

2007-06-19 08:22:20 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

What do you do when you want to screw only the working people of your nation with the largest tax increase in history and hand those trillions of dollars to your wealthy campaign contributors, yet not have anybody realize you've done it? If you're Ronald Reagan, you call in Alan Greenspan.
Through the "golden years of the American middle class" - the 1940s through 1982 - the top income tax rate for the hyper-rich had been between 90 and 70 percent. Ronald Reagan wanted to cut that rate dramatically, to help out his political patrons. He did this with a massive tax cut in the summer of 1981.
The only problem was that when Reagan took his meat axe to our tax code, he produced mind-boggling budget deficits. Voodoo economics didn't work out as planned, and even after borrowing so much money that this year we'll pay over $100 billion just in interest on the money Reagan borrowed to make the economy look good in the 1980s, Reagan couldn't come up with the revenues he needed to run the government.
Coincidentally, the actuaries at the Social Security Administration were beginning to get worried about the Baby Boomer generation, who would begin retiring in big numbers in fifty years or so. They were a "rabbit going through the python" bulge that would require a few trillion more dollars than Social Security could easily collect during the same 20 year or so period of their retirement. We needed, the actuaries said, to tax more heavily those very persons who would eventually retire, so instead of using current workers' money to pay for the Boomer's Social Security payments in 2020, the Boomers themselves would have pre-paid for their own retirement.
Reagan got Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Alan Greenspan together to form a commission on Social Security reform, along with a few other politicians and economists, and they recommend a near-doubling of the Social Security tax on the then-working Boomers. That tax created - for the first time in history - a giant savings account that Social Security could use to pay for the Boomers' retirement.
This was a huge change. Prior to this, Social Security had always paid for today's retirees with income from today's workers (it still is today). The Boomers were the first generation that would pay Social Security taxes both to fund current retirees and save up enough money to pay for their own retirement. And, after the Boomers were all retired and the savings account - called the "Social Security Trust Fund" - was all spent, the rabbit would have finished its journey through the python and Social Security could go back to a "pay as you go" taxing system.
Thus, within the period of a few short years, Reagan dramatically dropped the income tax on America's most wealthy by more than half, and roughly doubled the Social Security tax on people earning $30,000 or less. It was, simultaneously, the largest income tax cut in America's history (almost entirely for the very wealthy), and the most massive tax increase in the history of the nation (which entirely hit working-class people).
But Reagan still had a problem. His tax cuts for the wealthy - even when moderated by subsequent tax increases - weren't generating enough money to invest properly in America's infrastructure, schools, police and fire departments, and military. The country was facing bankruptcy.
No problem, suggested Greenspan. Just borrow the Boomer's savings account - the money in the Social Security Trust Fund - and, because you're borrowing "government money" to fund "government expenditures," you don't have to list it as part of the deficit. Much of the deficit will magically seem to disappear, and nobody will know what you did for another 50 years when the Boomers begin to retire 2015.
Reagan jumped at the opportunity. As did George H. W. Bush. As did Bill Clinton (although Al Gore argued strongly that Social Security funds should not be raided, but, instead, put in a "lock box"). And so did George W. Bush.
The result is that all that money - trillions of dollars - that has been taxed out of working Boomers (the ceiling has risen from the tax being on your first $30,000 of income to the first $90,000 today) has been borrowed and spent. What are left behind are a special form of IOUs - an unique form of Treasury debt instruments similar (but not identical) to those the government issues to borrow money from China today to fund George W. Bush's most recent tax cuts for billionaires (George Junior is still also "borrowing" from the Social Security Trust Fund).
Former Bush Junior Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill recounts how Dick Cheney famously said, "Reagan proved deficits don't matter." Cheney was either ignorant or being disingenuous - it would be more accurate to say, "Reagan proved that deficits don't matter if you rip off the Social Security Trust Fund to pay for them, and don't report that borrowing from the Boomers as part of the deficit."

2007-06-19 08:17:19 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-19 07:47:31 · 11 answers · asked by Gisele 1

These Nazis will definately loose the white house and Adolph Hitler Jr, (bush) will be charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity, the Jihadist Christian Nazi Party(republicans) will only have a handfull of house and senate seats so in 08 President Hillary and Vice President Obama will have their victory and the dems will controll both houses of congress, we will then have
Universal Health Care, Equal and Quality Education for all, low gas prices,millions of new HIGH PAYING Jobs, not like the low slave wage jobs Emperor Bush created, and the war in Iraq will come to an end and we can concentrate more on Bin Laden and Afghanistan

2007-06-19 07:39:11 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think she should get it? Read here and give me your views.

http://coburn.senate.gov/ffm/index.cfm?FuseAction=OversightAction.View&ContentRecord_id=bf7e1789-802a-23ad-42e1-57d542e77901

2007-06-19 07:15:55 · 8 answers · asked by Cherie 6

I just recently became interested in the JFK shooting.... and my question is...How many people think the whole thing is a government conspiracy????

And if you know of any others.... what are they....I would love to learn about more

2007-06-19 06:25:10 · 13 answers · asked by ☼ImmaStar☼ 6

was it a mistake

2007-06-19 06:22:38 · 9 answers · asked by *Team Jacob Black* 3

will bush wait a short time, like september, then ask for thousands more?

2007-06-19 05:40:52 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

passports who have applied for them or their renewal more than twelve weeks ago and when the people working for the Passport agencies told them they would have their passports in time for their trips?

2007-06-19 04:59:54 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers