Government - January 2007

I live in Washington, but i do not know the names to get them. i do not have time to get them online. PLEASE HELP! Thanks

2007-01-14 13:56:13 · 7 answers · asked by mandi lala 1

2007-01-14 13:31:52 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-14 13:15:21 · 4 answers · asked by aNnE 1

2007-01-14 13:10:09 · 2 answers · asked by high 1

A few of the obvious things have been taken, (death penalty, immigration) i need something that is "debateable." I wanted to do something about freedom of students on the internet, since basically everything except for the school website is blocked by the tech team in my school. but i don't know how to argue that.
I wasn't sure if a bill had already been passed about abortion??

2007-01-14 12:41:48 · 3 answers · asked by tiffany 1

total of 5 years in a lifetime?

2007-01-14 11:23:05 · 7 answers · asked by . 5

2007-01-14 11:09:04 · 10 answers · asked by hannnnnnnah 2

The holy land is small country true I say very true. If you look around you the world is going into regional unity look at Europe many deferent languages and soon they will become one state it called the European union. What about you and your small country can you unite in one country and save your blood and money you fools.

2007-01-14 11:06:45 · 3 answers · asked by DAVAY 3

How has the third Amendment helped us recently.

2007-01-14 10:55:43 · 5 answers · asked by Steve-O 5

and if we threw out the government and put the monarchy back in power .what new laws do you think King Charles would proclaim ?
(i know it will never happen)
it`s a what if question.

2007-01-14 10:46:32 · 17 answers · asked by keny 6

which amendment disqualifies anyone who has taken part in insurrection or rebellion against the government from holding a government office???? Please help me!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-01-14 10:31:23 · 2 answers · asked by stellaplace1 1

Where are they; possibly just not ready yet ???

2007-01-14 10:12:59 · 16 answers · asked by TRUTHSEEKER777 3

Only asking as the Government aren't doin much of a good job.

2007-01-14 09:54:34 · 19 answers · asked by CatsEyes16 1

2007-01-14 09:49:48 · 12 answers · asked by ngarhy 1

2007-01-14 09:29:25 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Can someone explain me what are the Pros and and Cons?

2007-01-14 09:16:00 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-14 08:59:51 · 3 answers · asked by Ray P 1

With the ever increasing possibility of Mr B becomiing PM will it piss the English off having a Scottish PM, or can he become a beacon for friendship and promote alliances? Personally I can't stand the idea but then I hate New labour but waht does everybody else think.

2007-01-14 08:07:02 · 14 answers · asked by Bailey P 2

http://youtube.com/watch?v=urBeQv6Ov3U

2007-01-14 07:55:38 · 14 answers · asked by jgroup01 2

the following isn't?

YES......it would make a statement to the world that the American people are aware of the things this busy little man has been up to.
Some reasons to IMPEACH :
1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of over one hundred thousand Iraqis, and thousands of U.S. G.I.s.

2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.

3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable.

4) Instituting a secret and illegal wiretapping and spying operation against the people of the United States through the National Security Agency.

5) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by

2007-01-14 07:25:27 · 13 answers · asked by Gettin_by 3

and why aren't they knocking at our doors, asking for thier money?

2007-01-14 07:21:43 · 9 answers · asked by Mighty Opinions 2

2007-01-14 07:01:54 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-14 06:48:48 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

Come on, really what the hell is wrong here......And don't reply that crap of "show me a source" just read between the lines.....not fox news......For example how many surges do we need to have before you guys think our President is correct?

2007-01-14 06:29:50 · 19 answers · asked by periacs 2

and hung the wrong bloke?

2007-01-14 06:22:39 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

In 1922, Benito Mussolini seized control of the Italian government. Roman
Catholicism was named the state religion. Labor unions were abolished,
strikes were forbidden, and political opponents were silenced. Mussolini
gave free rein to big business and reduced workers' wages.



Mussolini's rule is an example of what type of government?

A. Anarchy

B. Dictatorship

C. Monarchy

(and why)
D. Democracy

2007-01-14 06:12:02 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-14 06:01:02 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have a problem with saddam hussein being executed. Americans stormed into his country, forced him into hiding, captured him, took over his country, and is going to leave Iraq in the middle of a civil war. I know Saddam was a bad person but that gave us no right to to that to him. Think of all the other dictators in the world right now. I don't see Americans storming North Korea with thousands of troops. North Koreas dictator has killed tens of thousands of Koreans and is twice as ruthless as Saddam ever was. Also, there is proof that North Koreans have weapons of mass destruction. Iraq never did! But wait a minute, oh i get it now. North Korea is friends with China. We wouldn't want to upset the Chinese would we now. I guess it is better that we kill dictators that are defensless and accuse them of hiding weapons they never had in the first place. Can someone explain to me why we did something so stupid?!

2007-01-14 05:59:20 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

...and yes they have had fires, but some of them are producing oil. And it stands to reason that the United States is sharing some of those revenues, doesn't it?

2007-01-14 05:47:58 · 16 answers · asked by rare2findd 6

If PR was the system in place, everyone's vote would count. The present system does not truly reflect the electorate's wishes. PR would encourage more to use their vote, rather than the apathy generated by the present system.

2007-01-14 05:38:14 · 9 answers · asked by Rainman 4