Government - January 2007

2007-01-15 01:46:15 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-15 01:33:43 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-15 01:31:07 · 3 answers · asked by jameela n 1

2007-01-15 01:29:47 · 3 answers · asked by niko d 2

2007-01-15 01:15:33 · 7 answers · asked by tamdayash 1

...and maybe send him a little gift to congratulate him on his new position?

2007-01-15 01:09:41 · 4 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5

2007-01-15 00:56:24 · 7 answers · asked by Swirly 7

2007-01-15 00:09:42 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-14 23:46:55 · 1 answers · asked by ankit c 1

2007-01-14 23:40:19 · 8 answers · asked by jnwmom 4

I want all these negative people on this site to name the so called innocent lives President Bush is alleged to be responsible for. Then I want you to explain September 11 and tell me how many innocent lives were taken that day

2007-01-14 23:35:55 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Will Bush also allow police and military to enter citizens homes without a warrant if suspected of being a terrorist? Bush has authorized illegal warrantless wiretaps, e-mail records, phone records, and now the opening of Americans mail if the government sees fit. People we are in a police country!!!!!!!

2007-01-14 22:53:19 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-14 22:37:28 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-14 21:58:36 · 4 answers · asked by rajan t 3

and hung the wrong bloke?

2007-01-14 21:58:07 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-14 21:16:30 · 3 answers · asked by hello :) 2

Apparently in the 1950's the then French Prime Minister proposed a merger between Britain and France which was rejected.

If this had taken place, what do you think life would be like today?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6261885.stm

2007-01-14 20:09:53 · 20 answers · asked by footynutguy 4

The Others are:

George Bush
Dick Cheney
Donald Rumsfeld
Condi Rice
John Ashcroft
Rudy Guilanni
Larry Silverstein
Christie Whitman
Marvin Bush
Jeb Bush
Paul Wolfiwitz and others
Life in prision

Life in prision is too good for them scumbags!!

They are some of the worst people to ever walk the face of the earth!!

The killed 4000 Americans, Wounded Over 10000 Americans and Effected the Lives Of Hundreds Of Millions Of People WorldWide.

They were the masterminds Behind 9-11

2007-01-14 19:59:46 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Check the degrees of the two persons in questions...

2007-01-14 19:35:59 · 28 answers · asked by Hristo T 2

or is the president of the US the only one with that power? If you ask which state (because all state governing rules diffr) , take texas as an example.

2007-01-14 19:14:17 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

Like Hitler, President Bush was not elected by a majority, but was forced to engage in political maneuvering in order to gain office.


Like Hitler, Bush began to curtail civil liberties in response to a well-publicized disaster, in Hitler’s case the Reichstag fire, in Bush’s case the 9-11 catastrophe.


Like Hitler, Bush went on to pursue a reckless foreign policy without the mandate of the electorate and despite the opposition of most foreign nations.

Like Hitler, Bush is willing to go to war over the objections of the U.N. (League of Nations). His Iraq invasion was illegal and therefore a war crime as explained by Articles 41 and 42 of the U.N. Charter, which require two votes, not one, by the Security Council before any state takes such an action. First a vote is needed to explore all possibilities short of warfare (in Iraq’s case through the use of U.N. inspectors), and once this has been shown to be fruitless, a second vote is needed to permit military action.

2007-01-14 19:07:01 · 12 answers · asked by Bobby Q 1

2007-01-14 19:00:45 · 8 answers · asked by Truth 1

2007-01-14 18:52:24 · 2 answers · asked by SCORPIO 1

Note from A Study Of Our Decline by Philip Atkinson
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it Assimilation or Invasion?
by: Phyllis Schlafly
November 28, 2001
Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, support for the United States has poured in from around the world, but the response from Mexico has been decidedly lukewarm. A Gallup poll reported that 78 percent of Mexicans oppose contributing troops to a multinational coalition, and we have seen no indication that Mexico will modify its oil policy of acting like a member of OPEC.

While there is no evidence that the 9/11 terrorists entered over the Mexican border, the trial in El Paso of an Iraqi smuggler produced evidence that he alone brought more than 1,000 Middle East illegals into the United States via that route, charging his clients $10,000 to $15,000 each. Border Patrol agents have confirmed the increase in illegal aliens coming from the Middle East across our southern border and the fact that Arabs pay up to $50,000 each for a "coyote" to smuggle them into the United States.

The 9/11 events have temporarily shelved the foolish proposals to grant amnesty to three million Mexicans illegally living in our country. Unfortunately, there is no indication that Mexico has retreated from its longtime goal of opening the U.S. border.

In Chicago on July 27, 1997, then Mexican President Ernesto Zedilla told the National Council of LaRaza, "I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders." He announced a Mexican constitutional amendment that purports to allow Mexicans to retain their Mexican nationality even though they become U.S. citizens (which is contrary to the U.S. naturalization oath).

When President Vicente Fox came to the United States this year, he reiterated this line, proclaiming that "the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders" and includes migrants living in the United States. He called for open borders and endorsed Mexico's new dual citizenship law.

Some Mexicans use the term "reconquista," which is Spanish for reconquest, to describe their desire to see California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas acquired by Mexico and named the new country of Aztlan. They are teaching their youth that the United States "stole" those areas from Mexico and that they should be "returned."

The United States acquired the Southwest a century and a half ago in three ways: part by the 1845 annexation agreement with Texas, which was then an independent republic, part ceded by Mexico in the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo after the Mexican-American War, and part by the 1852 Gadsden Purchase

Mexico's claim to the Southwest originated with the 1494 Treaty of Tordesillas, which drew an imaginary line on the map to divide the Western Hemisphere between Spain and Portugal. Because geography had so many unknowns at that time, Portugal got only Brazil (which is why Brazilians speak Portuguese).

Other countries never recognized this treaty, and Americans consider it ridiculous even to talk about giving the Southwest to Mexico. Most national borders all over the world have come about as the result of war.

Mexicans obviously have no thought of invading the Southwest with troops, so their hope is reconquista by migration, both legal and illegal. According to Mario Obledo, founder of the Mexican American Legal Defense & Education Fund, "California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn't like it should leave."

An amnesty rally in the Los Angeles Sports Arena on June 10, 2000 attracted 25,000 people. In demanding amnesty for illegal Mexican aliens, the speakers proudly announced the names of at least a dozen unions in Los Angeles that are now headed by Mexicans.

Vicente Fox presented Mexico's Congress with a five-year development plan to eliminate the U.S.-Mexican border. He said he plans to serve "the 100 million Mexicans who now live in Mexico and the more than 18 million who live abroad," and to "strengthen our ability to protect and defend the rights of all Mexicans abroad."

Juan Hernandez, appointed by Fox as special liaison to Mexicans abroad, lobbies to get U.S. driver's licenses issued to illegal aliens and defends the Mexican government's issuance of desert survival kits to those sneaking across the border. On ABC's Nightline on June 7, he boasted: "We are betting that the Mexican-American population in the United States ... will think Mexico first."

Fox's five-year plan calls for building a larger consular presence in the United States, and this is already in operation. In U.S. areas with large Hispanic (including illegal) populations, the Mexican consul donates to the local public schools the same textbooks that are used in every elementary school in Mexico, grades 1 through 6.

The books, written in Spanish and including all academic subjects, teach that America "stole" the southwest from Mexico and that Mexico is entitled to take it back. The Mexican government considers these textbooks a symbol of Mexican national pride, guarantees a set to every Mexican child, and makes it a crime for anyone to sell them.

The only reason we learned about this Mexican plan is that one school in Santa Ana, California, decided to sell the books at a book fair and the local Hispanics kicked up a fuss about it. The school apologized to the Hispanics for selling the books, but should have apologized to the students for accepting the books in the first place.

The question we should ask our Mexican immigrant friends is, are you assimilating or invading?

Home Main Contents

2007-01-14 17:21:26 · 11 answers · asked by fivefootnuttinhuny 3

Heres a clipping from an article I read.
"I fully understand they could try to stop me," Bush said of the Democrat-run Congress. "But I've made my decision, and we're going forward."
Why do these statements not sound like statements made by a president of a democracy.
"I've made my decision, and nobody can stop me? Does this not sound more like statements belonging to an autocracy or maybe an oligarchy? wondering...

2007-01-14 17:17:11 · 10 answers · asked by Jujubear. 3

is america that uneducated as a whole? it started way back before carter.
http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/amin_en.html
http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_mandate_grand_mufti.php
http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~jkatz/husseini.html
this is the man to blame.
carter and reagan were in a political struggle. research more to learn about it.
http://www.aiipowmia.com/other/iranhstgcrss80.html

2007-01-14 17:12:26 · 2 answers · asked by kissmy 4

Has the British Government contributed to this by creating another Thatcher culture where people are more selfish and less socially responsible.

"It is appalling that we have a Deputy Prime Minister whose values are such that he is know as 'Two Jags', and Cherie Blair charges round an Australian supermarket collecting goods from the shelves for free. On top of that, the Blairs rarely seem to pay for their own holidays. It is a grab-it-and-run attitude that has led to a general atmosphere of greater selfishness."

what do you think ????

2007-01-14 16:26:02 · 10 answers · asked by Anthony B 2

2007-01-14 15:58:12 · 8 answers · asked by caciansf 4

There has not been an honest audit of our country's gold reserves since 1954. A sham audit was staged in 1974 but none of the gold was tested and independent auditors were not allowed. It is generally accepted that the United States is now gold-poor. Why won't anyone in the government answer questions or do an audit, which by our Constitution is required every year? Are most of our officials actually clever thugs, hoping to treat us like mushrooms...that is keep us in the dark and feed us BS?

2007-01-14 15:34:13 · 10 answers · asked by Paul 3

If they had known in advance of such things as handguns, and automatic, or semi-automatic weapons?

I think not.

2007-01-14 14:57:06 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous