English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the following isn't?

YES......it would make a statement to the world that the American people are aware of the things this busy little man has been up to.
Some reasons to IMPEACH :
1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of over one hundred thousand Iraqis, and thousands of U.S. G.I.s.

2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.

3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable.

4) Instituting a secret and illegal wiretapping and spying operation against the people of the United States through the National Security Agency.

5) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by

2007-01-14 07:25:27 · 13 answers · asked by Gettin_by 3 in Politics & Government Government

Yes you all say Bush never lied under oath. Bush and Cheney has refused to swear under oath I.e. to the 911 commission. You all need to read your history. So of course if he doesn't swear to tell the truth he can't be held to perjury.

Great Generals have retired from their careers due to this fool.

Perjury you say...for what? Monica Lewinsky...hence and extra marital affair.

2007-01-14 12:08:23 · update #1

13 answers

Simply, because generally a congress of the opposite party has to be in power for impeachment to even be suggested. There has been some talk of the democrats impeaching bush (they could impeach w/ a majority in the house, but they would never actually get him out of office in the senate), but hopefully they're above the partisan bickering. Interestingly enough, the only other president besides clinton to have articles of impeachment passed against him was Andrew Johnson. In this case, congress passed a law that they knew Johnson would breach (making it illegal for him to fire somebody without their consent, it was actually an unconstitutional law) and then when he of course did it, they impeached him. It has always been a politically motivated act. Probably the only president who was completely guilty of "high crimes and misdemeanors" was Nixon, but he resigned before he could be impeached.

2007-01-14 07:40:52 · answer #1 · answered by John C 2 · 1 3

Everyone is correct that Clinton was impeached for lying under oath and not extra activities with Monica.

Although you are not quite correct in your assessment of Bush, there is an element of truth in what you are saying.

Yes, he mislead the people on WMD and terrorists from Iraq and that was false. The justification was false and the war is/was illegal as far as the UN. Everyone is still trying to figure why so many young Americans and Iraquis died?? Why? Is it really the oil? or just power?

I believe that was the question that Helen Thomas asked and she really got a short shift.

I believe that there are impeachable offenses that the Bush administration has carried out and impeachment could happen. Especially since they are escalating the war rather than a new direction.

I do agree that lying about sex and being responsible for the killing of so many people does not seem balanced.

I have a feeling that justice will prevail here and the action may begin this year.

2007-01-14 09:04:20 · answer #2 · answered by Dave 2 · 2 0

i guess you're refering to Former president clinton, well the whole idea of the impeachment was stupid, i think it was unnecessary, the entire FBI and CIA gave up all their investigations and instead investigfated the man who avoided war for just having a good time, Yes he was the president but that doesn't change the fact that he was also a normal human being with weakness for sweetness who didn't stay strong when he was faced with temptation. the reason why threatening the sovereignty of Iraq isn't impeachable is because of the gain. America will only sacrifice it's own people if they know they'll get sometihng in return and that return is OIL, you wan tto tell me that they didn't know aht was going on in Rwanda, now it's SUDAN, millions of people most especially children died and no one cared, not the same i happening today in Sudan and have you heard Bush sending any soldiers there..NO

I believe they lied about this war, we were told that Iraq was the most dangerous regime on earth, how come it only took 2 wks to over throw the entire government, it's all mambo jambo, me adn you can never expect any impeachment on the things you mentioned above, never never never, maybe 30years from now and they will come up with an apology, we didn't know. By the way in my own opnion, i think the UN was never lied to, USA controls the UN and contributes the most funds so Un does what it's told, it's all a game, they play it like chase and pretty good at it.

2007-01-14 07:55:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

you watch too much TV or listen to yourr liberable minded teachers.

Willy was impeached for Perjury and For Lying to a Federal Prosecutor, the later which was dropped.

He was not tossed out of office like he should have been, but his articles of impeachment are still valid, even though the Senate didn't have the kahoonies to stamp the verdict.

The rest of what you said is all hog wash. liberal talking points. Lets just say this," I would rather have our troops over there killing the terrorists than the terrorists over here killing my kids."

2007-01-14 10:55:17 · answer #4 · answered by mndapa1 3 · 0 1

Article 2, Section 4--". . .on impeachment for, and on conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors."



Your right, you can't be impeached for having an extramarital affiar. Clinton never was. Learn something before you look silly (opps to late) Clinton was impeached for committing a felony called perjury. You can lie all you want, about whatever you want, but once you raise your hand and LIE under oath, you comitt a CRIME. That is why he was impeached, disbarred in his state and disbarred from the US supreme court.
All of what you listed about Bush is your own opinion. None of what you list is a crime by any means and therfore not impeachable. You can't impeach because you don't like someone, their politics etc.
Just to answer a few of your opinions above... he never siezed power (your opinion) and never saw anything in the constituttion about your wars of agression (aren't all wars agressive??) The constitution actaully gives him 100% authority to wage war. The whole declaration thing is misunderstood. All the lies you allege are also your opinion, but his info was the same info clinton, kerry, gore, kennedy, albright etc had for 8 years before him and acted on and made public statements about.
Ah, sorry to tell you, but civilains die in war. Lots of them. Thats why its called war. MILLIONS dies in ww2. We directly bombed entire cities. That is actually how you win a war and how it has been done since the dawn of time. The purpose of a war is to make the populace give up. When an enemy hides among the people and the people support and defend them, they are part of the problem. As afr as wire taps, etc.. Do you know anyone affected? Do you know anyone who knows anyone affected? I haven't heard of a single, innocnet US citizen person alleging mistreatment from the PAtriot act, wire taps etc... I think the liberal media would have some grandma in Bosie all over the papers if her phone was tapped in error. Are you are terrorist?? If not, you have nothing to worry about. They ain't spying on the people of the US, there spying on the people who want to KILL the people of the US. Get it?

Once again, you did not list a single reason to impeach. I suggest you get a book, read up on reasons to impeach. (like perjury) Bush never swore any of what you allege under oath.
Plus congress has nowhere near the 2/3 majoity needed to impeach. Impeachment would also bring out a lot of ugly things that a great many Democrat senators, Democrat congress members and a certain Ex-president would rather remain quiet.
Your heroes in Congress and the moron web sites you visit feed you this BS and you lap the Kool Aid up like a good little lemming. Inreality, they know impeachment isn't even a remote option, yet they put it out there to keep idiots like you entertained and supporting them, so they can continue to rob, steal and line their pockets and support their donors. You think your heores on the hill are on your team? Think again. They laugh at mindless fools like you.

And to add to you education, impeacment is nothing. It is merely the equivalent of an indictment. It is not removal. After impeachment, he is then tried before the senate (no democrat 2/3) where all the dirty laundry will come out. Even if he is convicted, it still doesn't mean removal. That could be one of the penalties, among many... As far as history, only one President was impeached... Dollar Bill. Andrew Johnson never got that far since congress passed a illegal law to trap him into breaking it. It was a political game, much like any talk of impeaching bush.
Go refill your Kool Aid now....

2007-01-14 07:54:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I agree with the latter, but Clinton wasn't impeached for having an extra-marital affair. But I certainly see your point in comparing the two. And you're right, which is worse?

2007-01-14 08:20:57 · answer #6 · answered by Shifter 3 · 1 0

For someone with a name like 'Realist" you don't have much of a grip on REALITY. Your hero Billybob Clinton was not impeached for doinking Fat Monica. he was impeached for yet another of his stinking lies. The Problem is that he lied to Congress and he lied to a Grand Jury after taking an oath that he would tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help his dumb@$$ God.

That reverse carpetbagger told so many lies that it was difficult to keep score, and he' still telling them and he's still a womanizing womanhater. There was the whole Monica thing and there was the "I smoked illegal drugs but I didn't inhale" thing and there's the "I give Sandy Berger permission to go into the National Archives and steal classified documents to cover my lily-white butt" thing.

Now I see that he was hitting on Demi Moore to the point where her (I guess you could call him) Husband was ready to throw a punch.

This guy is dispicable and he's lower than whale dung (and that's on the bottom of the oceans) so how can you keep defending him? He's personally responsible for destroying the Social Security trust Fund to create his phony balanced budget and he's personally responsible for the Middle east mess we have to deal with right now.

You need to get a grip on reality and realize that GWB is doing a good job and he's an honest man. He's been saddled with a world of crap that the Horny Hillbilly from Arkansa created. Why do you think Hillary didn't run for the Senate from Arkansas? BECAUSE NO ONE IN ARKANSAS WOULD HAVE VOTED FOR HER?

2007-01-14 07:47:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

He wasn't impeached for an affair, he was impeached for lying to a federal grand jury. And to the American people. Some like to say Bush lied about WMD's, but he didn't, he may have been wrong, but he didn't lie. There is a difference. You are wrong on all counts, I just don't have the energy.

2007-01-14 08:17:27 · answer #8 · answered by The Scorpion 6 · 0 3

he didn't get impeached for having an affair, he got impeached for lying under oath.. Congress granted Bush the power you say he "seized". He didn't lie, he was mistaken, there is a difference. We didn't have any orders to directly attack any civilians.

2007-01-14 07:38:47 · answer #9 · answered by goodtimefriend 3 · 4 3

Who was impeached for an extra-marital affair?

If you think it was Clinton, you have a lot to learn about history and quite frankly are either lying or misinformed.

Clinton was impeached for PERJURY.

I'm going to assume you have no clue what this means. Perjury is lying. Clinton lied to the grand jury and was impeached for that.

2007-01-14 07:38:47 · answer #10 · answered by Bill 3 · 5 4

fedest.com, questions and answers