Government - August 2006

Shouldn't people stand by there president? If you are unhappy with him/her show it with your vote in the next election. Meanwhile, you should still support him/her.

2006-08-26 09:04:38 · 22 answers · asked by Alex 3

American Goverment? Please, be specific.

2006-08-26 08:53:49 · 11 answers · asked by alfonso 5

If not, they should do seeing the state of the country

2006-08-26 08:47:00 · 12 answers · asked by bwadsp 5

MI5 /MI6. .etc are looking at what is being said on this site..??

2006-08-26 08:36:37 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

tell me.

2006-08-26 08:30:30 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-26 08:19:28 · 3 answers · asked by patweb01 3

I'm happy 4 the ceasefire in Lebanon,but what has israel achieved by killing so many innocent people 4 the lives of just two of their soliders,aren,t hezbola still in lebanon and now stronger than b4 ?.

2006-08-26 08:04:36 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-26 07:57:43 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-26 07:56:40 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Even which two comic book super hero's would you choose, and why? Anything is better than Bush & Channey.

2006-08-26 07:25:38 · 15 answers · asked by ZORRO 3

http://political.moveon.org/censure/

2006-08-26 07:19:01 · 23 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1

I am from germany and i just wondered about this question. To be honest: I neither like your president, nor my cancellor.
well anyway - answer my question please. thank you very much! sorry for my bad english!
peace!

2006-08-26 07:18:09 · 16 answers · asked by menschliches.wesen88 6

Internet freedom is under attack as Congress pushes a law that would give companies like AT&T the power to control what you do and see online

http://civic.moveon.org/save_the_internet/

2006-08-26 07:16:08 · 4 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1

when u go to pearl harbor do u excpect to see japanese people there or where the twin towers were do u excpect to see aribac or muslims. im just sayin if your race or country caused it would be dumb to go youll just be looked at funny then youlll report racisim

2006-08-26 07:15:09 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

To me they are like New Labour in different coloured ties, i wouldn't vote for the Tories.

2006-08-26 07:09:10 · 12 answers · asked by andylefty 3

"In order to rightly comprehend a thing, inquire first into the names, for rightful knowledge of things depends upon their names.”

You have been deceived and betrayed! Suffice it to say that you have been swindled, out of nothing less valuable, than your birthright and your sovereignty... simply through the largely overlooked, corruption of your name.

Your name is a legal expression of who you are. How it is written has legal and lawful significance. “John Henry Doe” signifies a true name written in accordance with the rules of English grammar and prescriptions of law, “JOHN HENRY DOE,” on the other hand, does not. A harmless variant of the original? Just for clarity or readability?

click here to read more....

http://www.worldnewsstand.net/law/U-Inc.htm

2006-08-26 07:00:44 · 4 answers · asked by devisional 2

or country whatever

2006-08-26 06:40:22 · 17 answers · asked by Nerdly Stud 5

2006-08-26 06:31:43 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-26 06:11:27 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous

In my history class, my teacher handed out an article about the US government and how it is held. it said that the united states wasnt democratic... and there were facts to back it up, but i forgot them. and that people think they are under democracy, but they really arent. is it true?

2006-08-26 06:07:11 · 6 answers · asked by cherry66 2

2006-08-26 05:55:49 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Who is our State senator??
who is our State house rep?
who is the mayor of ofallon, missouri
who is the us senators- for missouri
who is the us rep- for missouri

2006-08-26 05:22:54 · 4 answers · asked by california1991qt 1

i used to hear this guys name a lot in the news.

2006-08-26 05:18:15 · 7 answers · asked by drum4988 2

2006-08-26 04:55:26 · 5 answers · asked by alfonso 5

The Bush Administration has passed a law to make it so any project concerning energy production is protected by federal law.
In Coos Bay, Oregon they are building a Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) plant right on the outskirts of town. The people dont want it, neither does our senator (Peter DeFasio). Nobody can stop it from being built.
If this plant explodes it will wipe out 3 sqaure miles of our town including 2 schools, a mall, and the airport.
Whenever one of the delivery ships comes in we will have to evacuate the whole town 3 times a week.
Also they are building a 280 mile pipeline. anybodys property it touches will be confiscated with NO compensation. (I.E. they will take your land with or without your permission.)
they are building this LNG plant in oregon to supply California with natural gas. THEY CAN BUILD IN CALIFORNIA THEN!!
if you do not believe me read up on the Energy Act of 2005.
please contact you Senators and speak out.
THIS IS WRONG!!!
tell me your thoughts

2006-08-26 04:48:57 · 11 answers · asked by mig_killing_pigs 2

I read recently in the Sentencing Project about half the states have some version of 3 strikes and you're out, which is really determinate sentencing for habitual offenders. However, California had some 40,000 people in prison for 2nd and 3rd strikes, which was by far the greatest number of prisoners under 3 strikes laws. The second state had fewer than 1000 state prisoners. The reason is that California allows the third offense to be any felony and in some cases (known as wobblers), a misdemeanor crime can be turned into a felony if the justice system so deems.

In a few cases, men who had two or more previous felonies but who were caught stealing golf clubs, cookies and videos were sentenced to 25 years to life (one was 50 to life) for the third offense. This seems extremely punitive, and these 3 strikes cases is one reason the state prison system has a federal special master who overlooks the prisons. Some believe the feds are about to take over due to severe over-crowding.

2006-08-26 04:36:01 · 10 answers · asked by Shelley 3

http://www.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Approval.htm

All signs point to "YES"

2006-08-26 04:21:03 · 4 answers · asked by mikeygonebad 2

2006-08-26 04:08:59 · 4 answers · asked by locnload@sbcglobal.net 1

Its logical (*_~)

2006-08-26 03:55:54 · 16 answers · asked by Gengi$ 6

Me and my boyfriend are renting an effiency apartment with no refrigerator and we are paying the same rent as the other people but hey do have a refrigerator is it legal?

2006-08-26 03:43:13 · 8 answers · asked by chilanga 1