Elections - December 2007

2007-12-24 05:23:01 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-24 05:14:04 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or even discussed for that matter? I can't seem to find it.

2007-12-24 05:07:56 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Now that Lieberman has endorsed McCain, and both their parties have at time treated them like rejects, would they run together as independents?

2007-12-24 05:03:59 · 5 answers · asked by Hill Billy (JetAnders) 2

who is this Ron Paul and what does he stand for? it's just that you all seem to be going mad for him. i just hope it doesn't turn out to be like the last one

Al Gore- Nobel peace prize

George W Bush- head in pieces prize

2007-12-24 04:58:42 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-24 04:46:06 · 24 answers · asked by MrEntrepreneur 3

2007-12-24 04:39:02 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-24 04:38:35 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

It is an outrage that waiters, waitresses, and other service-sector employees have to pay taxes on the tips they earn. The IRS makes an estimate of how much service-sector workers will make in tips, and taxes them on it even if the taxpayer did not actually earn as much as the IRS' estimate!

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/no-taxes-on-tips/

What? This is outrageous! No taxes on tips!? What is he thinking?!

2007-12-24 04:18:00 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/

What part of this do you disagree with? I can't find a single thing.

2007-12-24 04:15:07 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Several things are required to be achieved on the international front. Not only ending the Iraq War and bringing back the army. Further wars are to be averted. Nuclear disarmament is to be given forward movement. CTBT is to be realised. This requires the personal rapport of the type and scale the Clintons enjoyed during and after Clinton Presidency. Do any of the other candidates have got any such exposure ? Definitely not. They will lose lot of time in preparing for the events. It matters really.

2007-12-24 04:13:36 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zT-ouQPgMmI
Watch how he takes the mic away from these city workers at a townhall meeting. Then proceeds to call them morons.

2007-12-24 04:06:14 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

most people do not. i had to ask myself the question why when he is a fundraising leader with tremendous support.
any comments why or other comments?
can you believe all the free press Hillary got when the mentally challenged man came to her office.

2007-12-24 04:04:12 · 13 answers · asked by needliberty 2

2007-12-24 03:15:32 · 8 answers · asked by needliberty 2

We're beginning to get a nice little collection of oil rich colonies over there in Asia now aren't we? Since there has been a lot of American lives lost and money spent, I think that we deserve to be able to exploit the natural resources of our enemies as payback for who we've lost and what we've spent, don't you? Every service member should recieve $100,000, every disabled vet should recieve $1000,000 and every KIA vets family should recieve $10,000,000. If there's any left over it could used towards paying off the U.S. deficit and national debt, don't you think?

2007-12-24 03:07:35 · 1 answers · asked by ? 3

He is by far the most presidential on either party. Plus he has run many, many corp's. Please set politics assisde and ask yourself.

PS now I know why you guys hated Bushes qualifications.

2007-12-24 01:47:50 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

If the GOP is really serious about this religious business, why not nominate Jesus Christ directly for president and form a committee of 'earthly servants' to transmit His word to the American people? Then we'd have no need for congress or a Supreme Court. According to the republicans and even some democrats we'd get better government for less. Let's kick this around!

2007-12-24 01:21:21 · 15 answers · asked by Noah H 7

2007-12-24 00:19:42 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

the president has no control over state marriage laws, besides why would it concern anyone if us gays want to marry, it doesn't affect straight marriage, are straight people so concerned that their own marriages are shaky to begin with?

2007-12-24 00:17:16 · 8 answers · asked by Neilmouse 1

horribly resembling a satelite of the USA Jason W

2007-12-24 00:17:08 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Rember the Weapons of Mass Destruction that were not in Iraq

2007-12-23 23:26:29 · 15 answers · asked by jeffwey m 4

GOP strategists, politicians and journalists are very harsh only toward Hillary, i guess they do not want her as dem front-runner and prefer Obama to be the challenger.
This leads thinking that if Obama wins the dem caucuses, republicans will get once again the Presidency.

2007-12-23 23:19:25 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

hillary and obama lead national polls against all republican nominees expect ron paul

2007-12-23 23:03:17 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."

2007-12-23 22:47:43 · 14 answers · asked by vote_usa_first 7

2007-12-23 21:52:22 · 6 answers · asked by moose16480 2

Anyone has to be better than George.

2007-12-23 21:49:11 · 15 answers · asked by Helena 6

2007-12-23 20:11:33 · 18 answers · asked by ethology 4

hurt the sentiments of VOTERS, will it not have adverse affect on the other states' elections in the minds of Hindus?

2007-12-23 19:46:35 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why do we have electoral votes? In the past, presidential candidates have focused on states that have the most electoral votes while practically ignoring other states. Wouldn't we have real democracy if a presidential candidate won the presidency by having the popular vote, and with every vote counting?
Who thinks this "winner take all" system is fair?

Example: (The 2000 presidential election)

Gore won the popular vote with 50,996,116 votes but only had 266 electoral votes.

Bush had 50,456,169 votes but he had 271 electoral votes.

How is it fair that Bush won even though he had less overall votes? Is this democracy?

(For those of you who think I'm mad because I voted for Gore, thats not the case, I voted for Bush, but I think Gore should have won.)

2007-12-23 19:06:25 · 5 answers · asked by JAG 2

2007-12-23 17:39:48 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous