Elections - December 2007

None of the candidates even mentions the name of Bush anywhere when they campaign. So far in all presidential debates not a single candidate -- guiliani, romney, huckabee even mentioned the name of Bush.

If they are truly republican, then why don't they say

"Since Bush presidency has been so successful, I urge voters to vote me because i will reprsent GOP".

I really doubt if they really are even conservative enough.

2007-12-23 17:39:07 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I need to know whether the revised electoral roll along with the photo for thiruvallur district has been published in the net(internet)? If so what is the website and what is the link?

2007-12-23 17:26:33 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-23 17:21:27 · 5 answers · asked by hc44president 2

i used to until i spent 90 min. watching a documentry at
http://www.loosechange911.com/lc2.shtml
watch the whole thing then tell me what you think!

2007-12-23 16:34:09 · 42 answers · asked by david s 1

2007-12-23 16:23:05 · 9 answers · asked by Naturescent 4

I think he is the only candidate that is worth something. In my opinion the rest of them are just playing politics, saying whatever is going to get them more votes, they're just a bunch of puppets.
I would like to hear what are your negative thoughts about Ron Paul,

2007-12-23 16:18:32 · 22 answers · asked by Marcus 2

2007-12-23 16:09:44 · 16 answers · asked by general_lee6165 1

Here's the thing that perplexes me. From an evolutionary standpoint it would be impossible for homosexuality to be genetic. Those that don't reproduce don't pass on their genes. It would have to be a very short lived gene mutation if that were true. By this logic, it must be a choice.

2007-12-23 16:04:55 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Some friends have been urging me to buy as many guns as I can just in case Hillary or Obama get elected. It's been said that they will ban guns once in office.

2007-12-23 15:46:35 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-23 15:38:35 · 8 answers · asked by !!BamBam's Mom!! 3

I'm not interested in hearing why you aren't supporting another candidate or reasons only based on race, gender or religion.

Please provide links to show they actually support those views because many times opinion is distributed as fact with nothing to base it upon.

2007-12-23 15:04:46 · 15 answers · asked by mickbw 5

Outside of being a spouse of a governor and president, what really are her qualifications..... just wondering?

Also have wondered what her ties with New York was, was she born there? or did she just have a desire to represent them? how good of a job has she done representing them? I haven't followed her voting record as I do not reside in the state of New York?

2007-12-23 14:08:03 · 19 answers · asked by wondering 4

I understand his view, but not to the entirety of his solution to Energy.

2007-12-23 13:42:37 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-23 13:27:36 · 11 answers · asked by ? 6

2007-12-23 13:25:26 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-23 13:19:52 · 24 answers · asked by beatyful 2

I am an independent voter. I am not backing for any candidates at this time. According to CNN, "Truth is, he wasn’t very religious,” said Obama. “He met my mother. My mother was a Christian from Kansas, and they married, and then divorced. I was raised by my mother. So I’ve always been a Christian."

He clearly stated that he was raised by his mother and she was a Christian. If it’s true, why did his mother get married to another Muslim after she divorced Obama's father? He spent his childhood in Indonesia with his mother & step father. I want independent voters (Please no Obama, Hillary, Edwards, or Republican voters) to respond please!

2007-12-23 13:18:29 · 5 answers · asked by Ben 1

2007-12-23 13:12:17 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

It was strange, the game was moving forward then all of the sudden this horrible rain and wind started knocking stuff down and I thought I saw this witch on a broomstick with this strange eardrum killing laugh... did anyone else see that?

2007-12-23 13:05:29 · 4 answers · asked by Stealth 2

Mike Huckabee is trying to immitate the grassroots support of the top GOP fundraiser (who raised more than six million in one day), and raise a million dollars by December 27, 2007.

http://dec27th.hucksarmy.com/

Looks like the Huckster's Army needs a few more recruits and about ten times more than what he has now.

2007-12-23 12:53:13 · 6 answers · asked by Soul Man 6

issues today is illegal immigration. Apparently none of the Dem. candidates have a clue as to how midstream America feels about this or either don't care Their solution is to make them legal and that ain't gonna fly.

2007-12-23 12:45:02 · 9 answers · asked by Bennie Y 2

2007-12-23 12:31:46 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you've watched the news shows this weekend, basically what they all say is that Hillary Clinton, despite her 20 plus point national lead over Obama (and even more over Edwards) is still in trouble. Why? Because in the early states: Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, they're running about even. But what I don't understand is why no one seems to talk about the 3 other early states: Nevada, Michigan and Florida. It just so happens that Clinton is way ahead in these 3 states. Do you think that the news shows fail to mention this because they want to make a contest out of it in order to have more of an exciting story? Or is Clinton truly vulnerable, even though she's leading by wide margins in almost every state other than the 3 aforementioned ones plus Illinois?

2007-12-23 12:31:00 · 5 answers · asked by Stephen L 6

2007-12-23 12:18:46 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Ok, now heres a question, ALOT OF PEOPLE are seriously saying that ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS are a HUGE issue, people want presidential candidates to talk about what they are going to do about these illegal immigrants.

Now, my question is for THOSE OF YOU WHO THINK THIS IS A BIG ISSUE.

My question is:

Do you support NAFTA???????

Because if you support the "North american free trade agreement" which suggests that we "take down our borders" for free trade.

Implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) began on Jan. 1, 1994 and will complete in 2008. This agreement removes most barriers to trade and investment among the United States, Canada, and Mexico.
http://www.fas.usda.gov/info/factsheets/NAFTA.asp

http://www.citizen.org/trade/nafta/
A website that is against NAFTA, to be fair I included both.

So my point is, why do you support NAFTA and think that immigration is an issue.

Again this is TO THE PEOPLE who support NAFTA, oppose immigration.

2007-12-23 12:03:32 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-23 11:58:25 · 18 answers · asked by jongcr 1

I know that it certainly won't help him get elected since most Americans not only can't handle the truth they don't even want to hear it (if it's something bad) & since all political candidates know that US voters don't really like the truth, they do their best to accommodate the voters by lying about everything.

But it is really fun to watch Dr. Paul get so many people upset because they've actually heard the truth for the first time in their lives about US Govt & the disaster that it has become & they just can't accept that they've been lied to for so long by the very people they voted for.

2007-12-23 11:51:21 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-23 11:45:52 · 15 answers · asked by Thomas B 3

2007-12-23 11:45:01 · 10 answers · asked by Thomas B 3

I was with Hillary, but then switch to Ron. Which of these candidates are closest to the following.
1) Stop the War
2) Will give a North American Union (hey, no more illegals!)
3) Give Fairer Trials to Muslims
4) ehh........I really stopped at number 2.
5) oh! I found another! RIGHTS TO MINORS! (minors as in kids)
6) I found another! Testifying by the Quran

I still stopped at 2.

2007-12-23 11:29:50 · 13 answers · asked by لا إله إلاَّ الله 3