Yep. All looks good to me.
It's funny how presidential politics mirrors high school popularity. All the naysayers demand that Ron Paul and his supporters just sit down and shut up and accept the fact that he is not supposed to win. We are just supposed to let the annointed candidates move forward.
Thank goodness real life isn't high school.
2007-12-24 04:22:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
10⤊
1⤋
Have a Ron Paul Parade
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_24QoHko6Q
2007-12-24 04:35:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by KD7ONE 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
To other answers....if you are a teenager, close your legs. I was a teenager, as were we all, and always found time to go to school and work....I don't see "being a teenager" as an excuse. There are many intelligent teens that know better than this, which proves the other teens are unintelligent, and if they are lacking intelligence enough to not keep their legs closed, then they should be spayed immediately following the further wrong decision of abortion. Enough said.
2007-12-24 04:41:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Becksstein 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes and he's the only candidate who knows what he's talking about. All of the others are lying. He's not a 10 term Congressman for no good reason.
2007-12-24 04:54:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
seriously, I can't fathom that either, if you are an American and have studied your history, then you are awake and know the importance of supporting Ron Paul. We have to wake people up to this reality. Turn off the tv people, educate yourself and win a free country!
2007-12-24 04:20:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by mom4peace 3
·
10⤊
1⤋
The only reason people don't like him is because he is against the war, he is trying to accomplish what conservatives have been talking about doing for the last 80 years
2007-12-24 04:24:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
"I am also the prime sponsor of HR 300, which would negate the effect of Roe v Wade by removing the ability of federal courts to interfere with state legislation to protect life. This is a practical, direct approach to ending federal court tyranny which threatens our constitutional republic and has caused the deaths of 45 million of the unborn."
I wholeheartedly disagree with this. If he is willing to take away this very important right to choose (which is based on HIS religion, not what the people want) Then what other rights his is willing to take away based on HIS views, not the peoples?
He is agasint making public schools better, but would rather hand out vouchers for kids to go to private school. Where is the funding from this coming from? $5000 dollars a year is quite alot when you think of how many people this would be going to. Why not put that towards making public schools better, which is free for EVERYONE?
Is he for congress working more cohesively? I want a change from whats going on right now, with Bush vetoing every important bill that the democrats pass, and accuses THEM of playing political games. (hm... isnt that what he's doing?)
Other then that, i cant say i completely disagree with everything he is saying, but he doesnt really stand out in my mind. Oh well. You can vote for him, but my vote will be given to someone whos social issues are more aligned with mine.
**edit**
I believe that EVERYONE should have the right to choose, not just those in typically "liberal" areas. If you dont want abortion for you or your family members, fine. Educate them yourselves, and leave other families alone. And he's not prolife, he's anti choice. Even to save the life/fertility of the mother.
Oh, sanfranfreako, real mature. Just because it is typically a "liberal" area, and their views disagree with yours, they are "Freaks"?
**to below poster** I am not a teenager, I am 23, and work full time as a banker. I also donate and volunteer at Planned parenthood, and trust me, there is actually a very low percentage of teens compared to adults. People of all stereotypes and ages get them, and all for different reasons. Some for themselves, some for financial, and some because they are in abusive situations. Don't judge others. And, to say they should be spayed shows how compassionate you are.
2007-12-24 04:20:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by melissa 4
·
3⤊
6⤋
agree with Melissa, that is the one thing i constantly check for. A woman's right to control her own body. I get the pro-life stance, i do have children, but if i were raped or a teenager, i would want the right to choose!
2007-12-24 04:25:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Amy G 3
·
2⤊
4⤋
SURE HAVE and I won't vote for him! Where's his plan to eliminate the IRS, CIA & FBI? Your link doesn't mention that!
And when he eliminates the IRS, how is the government suppose to function? Oh, the fair tax he hasn't given any specifics to.
However, I totally agree with him regarding ONE thing. He say the 14th amendment is being misinterpreted regarding anchor babies. Wow!
2007-12-24 05:00:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋
Great question.
I've been wondering the same thing - I can't find anything to disagree with either.
You get a star!
[:
2007-12-24 04:17:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kelsette 3
·
9⤊
1⤋