English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 28 November 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

some say that during that time of month, she may make bad decisions, or she doesn't have the balls to use the nucuelar bombs. that's what i heard on a radio program, not my personal opinion.

2007-11-28 12:19:00 · 31 answers · asked by 2nd Commander 1 in Politics

Okay 1 I am not a sick old man.

I just want to know is it considered illegal to have pictures of your girlfriend naked. She gave them to you so they were not like spy pictures and they were intended for you.\

Your gf is 15 16 17
and you are 15 16 17

is this illegal or not?

BTW this is purely curiosity.

2007-11-28 12:13:01 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I recently had a mental eval done. I was supposed to deploy to Iraq September 3, but I have stuck in the rear because the Army doesn't think I am stable enough mentally to go. They are sending me to med-hold, though I only have a temporary profile, everyone is saying that not to keep my hopes up that they Army will chapter me for "unfit for duty." Does this happen frequently?

2007-11-28 12:11:00 · 3 answers · asked by proud mommy of twins 4 in Military

We are at war and they are bashing him, hoping we will lose. This will surely cost them the elections in 2008, fact.

2007-11-28 12:06:37 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

When the main reason she is where she is, is because of her husband. Not to mention her husband is a cheating womanizer that she stood subserviently by. She is not an example of a strong woman. Feminists and Women should ignore her.

2007-11-28 12:04:34 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

So i answered a Q in here, and listed the following 10 facts I have found after reading copious amounts on immigration, from both sides, and refered to the basic human needs for life... Yet some of you gave me a thumbs down?

Im confused how my fairly impartial answer resulted in thumbs down, do you not like facts reprinted? Are you angry about the human needs part? I I was just putting that in there for perspective... I even offered impartial solutions to the whole immigration prob?

2007-11-28 12:01:53 · 12 answers · asked by Avodah 6 in Immigration

2007-11-28 12:01:27 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

Burning neighborhoods. "No-Go" zones for the police. Total breakdown of social order. Hundreds of cars burning every night (and not just in Detroit!) Will we be torn apart by a sub-society that wants to re-make America in their image rather than assimilate?

2007-11-28 12:01:21 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

I would be so pissed if I was someone like Obama, Edwards or Biden. People who are much better suited to be the Democratic Nominee that got there on their own.

2007-11-28 11:54:52 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

Surely there is a law that could be passed, that would make the consequences so unpleasant that the illegals would make haste to get out of our country.

2007-11-28 11:54:46 · 17 answers · asked by madcat 5 in Immigration

What exactly does a debate have to do with the writers strike?

Unless the Democrats couldn't find any writer's to write questions for the audience or answers for the candidates.

What say you?

2007-11-28 11:52:28 · 6 answers · asked by Bubba 6 in Politics

2007-11-28 11:50:41 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

This will take a minute to read and I ask if you do not care to read please this in full please answer another question.Parkland Hospital, hasalmost 16,000 new babies arriving each year. (That’s almost 44 per day – every day).
A recent patient survey indicated that 70 percent of the women who gave birth at Parkland in the first three months of 2006 were illegal immigrants. , that’s 11,200 anchor babies born every year just in Dallas. The hospital spent $70.7 million delivering 15,938 babies in 2004 but managed to end up with almost $8 million in surplus funding. Medicaid kicked in $34.5 million, Dallas County taxpayers kicked in $31.3 million and the feds tossed in another $9.5 million. The average patient in Parkland’s maternity wards is 25 years old, married and giving birth to her second child. She is also an illegal immigrant. By law, pregnant women cannot be denied medical care based on their immigration status or ability to pay. Ok, fine. That doesn’t mean they should receive better care than everyday, middle-class American citizens. But at Parkland Hospital, they do.
Parkland Memorial Hospital has nine prenatal clinics. NINE. The Dallas Morning News article followed a Hispanic woman who was a patient at one of the clinics and pregnant with her third child – her previous two were also born at Parkland. Her first two deliveries were free and the Mexican native was grateful because it would have cost $200 to have them in Mexico. This time, the hospital wants to pay her $10 per visit and $100 for the delivery but she was unsure if she could come up with the money. Not that it matters, the hospital won’t turn her away. (I wonder why they even bother asking at this point). How long has this been going on? What are the long-term effects? Well, another subject of the article was born at Parkland in 1986 shortly after her mother entered the U.S. illegally – now she is having her own child there as well. (That’s right, she’s technically a U.S. citizen). These women receive free prenatal care including medication, nutrition, birthing classes and child care classes. They also get freebies such as car seats, bottles, diapers and formula.
Most of these things are available to American citizens as well but only for low-income applicants and even then, the red tape involved is almost insurmountable. Because these women are illegal immigrants they do not have to provide any sort of legitimate identification – no proof of income. An American citizen would have to provide a social security number which would reveal their annual income – an illegal immigrant need only to claim to be poor and the hospital must take them at their word. My husband is a pilot for the United States Navy (Yes, he fought in Iraq) an while the health care is good, we Navy wives don’t get any of these perks! Car seats? Diapers? Not so much. So, my question is this: Does our public medical care system treat illegal immigrants better than American citizens? Yes, it does!
Their (illegals) medical care is free – simply because they are illegal immigrants? Once again, there is no way to verify their income. Parkland Hospital offers indigent care to Dallas County earn less than $40,000 per year. (They also have to prove that they did not refuse health coverage at their current job. Yeah, the ‘free’ care is not so easy for Americans).
There are about 140 patients who received roughly $4 million for un-reimbursed medical care. As it turns out, they did not qualify for free treatment because they resided outside of Dallas County. So, the hospital is going to sue them! Illegals get it all free! But U.S. citizens who live outside of Dallas County get sued! How stupid is this?
As if that isn’t annoying enough, the illegal immigrant patients are actually complaining about hospital staff not speaking Spanish. In this AP story, the author speaks with a woman who is upset at the University of Texas Southwestern for which Parkland Hospital is the training facility will now have a Spanish language requirement added to their already jammed-packed curriculum. No other school in the country boasts such a ridiculous multi-semester (multicultural) requirement.

2007-11-28 11:50:15 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

Is the rest of the world laughing at Bush's ignorance?

2007-11-28 11:48:42 · 15 answers · asked by Dirk von Pelvis 1 in Other - Politics & Government

can you please help me list all of the GOOD things Bush has done for this country in the past 7 yrs.

1. Fighting terrorism over there instead of here.

(I will just try and give him the benefit of the doubt on that one)

I asked this question earlier today and didn't get many responses. Let's see what the evening YA answerers have to offer.

2007-11-28 11:48:20 · 9 answers · asked by MadLibs 6 in Politics

Which side are you rooting for?

Go Navy! Beat Army!

2007-11-28 11:47:44 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2007-11-28 11:46:34 · 2 answers · asked by Gerald T 1 in Government

No, the economy is fine.

Looks like Bush was right, and now liberals owe him a huge apology. Attacks down, peace on the horizon, liberals worse nightmare, sadly.

2007-11-28 11:41:12 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

If any of you are familiar with the century series of fighters we've seen that the F-100 and F-102 was exported to Turkey or Greece at one point and the F-104 to various nations. Why weren't any of the other mentioned fighters ever sold abroad? (excluding Canada's F-101s). The next generation F-4 Phantom meanwhile was widely exported.

They were built in lesser numbers I know but a good number of all those types still ended up in the Davis-Monthan AFB boneyard. Were they just surpassed by other fighters like the F-4, Mirage and other types that quickly in the 60's? or, on the other hand, did the US did not want to export them during the 50's?

2007-11-28 11:40:59 · 1 answers · asked by Boboftheplains 3 in Military

Invade two Islamic countries, dispose of two ruthless dictatorships, liberate 50 Million muslims from Tyranny and to this day track down and kill their terrorists on a massive scale?

Or do you think they thought we would just lob a couple of bombs into Baghdad like Clinton did and forget about it?

2007-11-28 11:40:55 · 14 answers · asked by PNAC ~ Penelope 4 in Politics

2007-11-28 11:39:40 · 3 answers · asked by sunshinegrrl 1 in Law & Ethics

2007-11-28 11:35:48 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I'm writing an essay one the freedom of press and I need to know if the freedom of expressing yourself throgh media (T.V., radio) is the same thing as it is in press (newspaper, magazines).

2007-11-28 11:33:48 · 3 answers · asked by Ely 1 in Government

fedest.com, questions and answers