Politics & Government - 2 July 2007

(i do not know if this question already been asked, so i wil ask now)
This persecution of jews, hatred against jews and antisemitism must have had a starting point. What was it? or how, when, who?

2007-07-02 06:17:15 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I hear a lot of people say they don't like her but no one ever states why. So I'm just wondering why you don't like her.

For me she has 8 years experience in the white house and seems to be a very smart woman. I could see myself voting for her. I really do think we need to change the political party in office.

2007-07-02 06:16:53 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

As far as our healthcare, and the war in Iraq.

2007-07-02 06:16:06 · 22 answers · asked by Ricky A 1 in Government

2007-07-02 06:13:50 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

A Truck Driver, Plumber, Construction Worker, or a Teacher. Or will you only vote for the politically selected people running for the main parties. Please explain.

2007-07-02 06:12:33 · 8 answers · asked by Fab 4 in Elections

1. Because they have, post JFK, been taken over by anti USA leftist like Michael Moore and Cindy Sheehan they will NOT defend the country from foreign enemies.

2. They will gut the military and intelligence services to pay for all the handouts they promise their supporters.

3. They always raise taxes. Every time without fail. JFK was the last dem to CUT taxes.

4. They are hostile to people of religious faith.

5. They are the pro gay marriage and abortion on demand party.


The republicans are FAR from perfect but that does not mean people want us to be like CANADA. No military and never ending entitlements.

2007-07-02 06:12:26 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Wasn't your great grandfather an immigrant?

2007-07-02 06:12:15 · 7 answers · asked by Catch 22 5 in Politics

Assuming his party´s policies the best of course...

2007-07-02 06:11:58 · 58 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

2007-07-02 06:11:27 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Dogs star to bark. Problem I have is deciding on whether I am crazy & suffering from paranoid delusions or if I need to raise the volume. If Crazy-I stop trying to inform people and if not then, what do I do & how?
When I tell people, I get no response other than a funny stare. After lengthy, research I feel 100% now that 911 was an inside job to jump start the war.Answer this-How many buildings collapsed on that day? 2 buildings?wrong-it was three-ask people that and you get a lot of 2 answers-Why? GW's brother & cousin ran the Security company in charge of the WTC complex & United Airlines that day. And many too many other coinsdences that need answers on. Please HELP ME-look into these sites & let me know if this is crap or if more questions need to be asked. Tell me if I should stop or turn up the volume?In the worst case sinerio, what do we do?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_corrosion.html http://www.apfn.org www.911truthla.us

2007-07-02 06:09:28 · 7 answers · asked by Larkztongue 2 in Civic Participation

I think it's to sell it to the sheeple. What about you?

2007-07-02 06:06:51 · 9 answers · asked by RP McMurphy 4 in Other - Politics & Government

What should the criteria be?

2007-07-02 06:05:36 · 3 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics

2007-07-02 06:05:17 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

Librals hate Bush cause he's got good, Christian Moral Values.

2007-07-02 06:03:23 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

-all 10 million New Yorkers evacuate the city ASAP?
-Would they all blow it off as Al Qaeda trick?
-Where would they all go to live?
-How long would they all have to stay away from the city?
-How would such an economic catastrophe of shutting down NYC indefinitely be handled?
-How much worse would it be than 9/11 would it be (how bad would be to try and get 10 million New Yorkers out of the city all at the same time?)

-And last but not least what if it was all a hoax?

Is the threat of a terrorism worse than an actual terror attack & should Americans be controled by the fear of terror or should they do more to control/manage that fear so Bin Laden can't launch terror attacks w/o even having to attack the US?

2007-07-02 06:01:06 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-07-02 05:59:20 · 21 answers · asked by Jane T 3 in Immigration

2007-07-02 05:58:19 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-07-02 05:55:05 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I am illegal and now my american husband caught me cheating and the a$$h0l3 is trying to deport me. I can't help cheating or getting feelings for someone else but if he were to cheat its different cuz hes a man, you know? Women have diffrent needs! Is there a way out of this?

2007-07-02 05:49:46 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

Is that the excuse the GOP wants to give for Bush disbanding the group looking for Bin Laden? THAT's the reason? You hate Clinton, so why not act just like him? Really? Seriously?

2007-07-02 05:49:30 · 1 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."

~ Adolf Hitler

(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)

"I am a fan of the social policies that you find in Europe" Hillary in 1996 From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 76 - Hillary in 1996)

"Many of you are well enough off that [President Bush's] tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to have to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."(Hillary grandstanding at a fund raising speech in San Francisco; SFGate.com 6/28/2004.)

2007-07-02 05:49:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-07-02 05:47:36 · 25 answers · asked by Catch 22 5 in Politics

Was she really so innocent that a lonely spider caused her to run away screaming?? Or was she strung out and tripping on some bad drugs??? Just what IS 'Curds and Whey' anyway? Don't EVEN get me started on what a 'tuffet' is.............
YOU decide today on Y!A Court!!!!

2007-07-02 05:45:55 · 13 answers · asked by cme2bleve 5 in Law Enforcement & Police

Keith Oberman Reported Friday on M.S.N.B.C. that the car bombs in London were a non-event carried out by Idiots.Of course we know what happened Saturday.Do'es N.B.C. have an Obligation to report Honestly or can they decide the facts before the facts are known?G.E.,Disney owns N.B.C. news is it time to stop Dealing with G.E.?

2007-07-02 05:45:18 · 6 answers · asked by john 2 in Other - Politics & Government

I am a Vietnam vet myself. Do you really think we are making a difference, or is it all dust in the wind?

2007-07-02 05:43:22 · 12 answers · asked by Chic 6 in Military

Mine is the Ju-87

2007-07-02 05:39:50 · 24 answers · asked by What you did....Why?....Why?.... 2 in Military

Tired of being restricted at celebrating being English( Trying to ban image of Santa, people stopping us putting union jacks up at the world cup)

2007-07-02 05:39:26 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

Saying "it's religion so explanation is inapplicable" isn't good enough. That's a cop-out. The very idea that religion needs to be defined as outlandish, insubstantial things is a logical fallacy. For example, although men can fake documents and lie about texts, they cannot create mountains and stars -- therefore, it makes more sense to think of nature as something divine.
It is those who make the most spectacular claims that have to provide the most spectacular evidence and logic. It is not secularists that have to disprove anything (they are not claiming to know things that cannot be known) but rather the religious who have 100 percent of the burden of proof. If they cannot do it, then they warrant no consideration or interest from anyone.

2007-07-02 05:38:34 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

companies are now allowed to discriminate against smokers and not hire us? Should we not be eligible for disability benefits? Since it is getting more and more difficult to find a job? and quitting is next to impossible for some smokers, shouldn't we have the ability to go on disability?

2007-07-02 05:35:13 · 11 answers · asked by RubyUnicorn 3 in Politics

to vote against their own self interest and for the interest of the wealthy?

For example

Lower taxes
By lowering taxes the rich save a huge a mount of money (yes because they pay a huge amount of money) while the middle class and lower class save less money and in return have to pay more than their tax savings in new or higher user fees.

Social security
By privatizing it, the owners of the system will make huge profits while the participants will receive less in benefits.

Medical insurance
The top dogs of the corporations make an obscene amount of money, while middle and lower class pray that if a health issue arises that they will be taken care of.

The war
In hindsight, the war was based on illussion. Yet if you are of the right stripe are still for it but against raising taxes. The pro business pres has lowered the taxes to be paid currently but in reality has raised future taxes.

How do the powers that are push our buttons so magically to get us to accept this

2007-07-02 05:33:56 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics