Politics & Government - 21 April 2007

can weapons of mass deception be more dangerous than weapons of mass destruction?

2007-04-21 02:00:59 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Before the ban there had been two tragic incidents, Hungerford and Dunblane, both preventable if the Police had done their job properly. Both perpetrators had been known to the Police as unsuitable to own firearms (they both held legal firearm certificates). Within months of the second incident (Dunblane) why did gun crime start to rise in the UK?

For those that answer this please research your answers, do not give smartarse answers as comedy and needless deaths do not go together.

2007-04-21 01:55:30 · 25 answers · asked by Brian R 5 in Law Enforcement & Police

2007-04-21 01:52:24 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

will He be fighting against and will the United States be one of them?

2007-04-21 01:48:25 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

Would it be considered unethical to go for a lower paying job by omitting the fact that you have a masters degree? Why?

People do need to make a living.

2007-04-21 01:31:36 · 6 answers · asked by FOA 6 in Law & Ethics

Is any debt that my spouse has eliglbe for relief under the soldiers and sailors act?

2007-04-21 01:29:20 · 6 answers · asked by jimboyd1 1 in Military

There is obviously more to the story than his little bratty daughter not answering the phone. It would make no sense to say that stuff for just not answering the phone.

Now with that said, why in the world is everyone making a big deal about this?

Being called a pig, rude, etc isn't bad. Are now living in a society of arm chair quarterbacks that think they can dictate how you can talk to your kids?

I wish "pig" was the worst thing my parents ever called me.

2007-04-21 01:25:22 · 15 answers · asked by sshazzam 6 in Law & Ethics

This morning I found a mobile phone I picked it up and put it in my bag.

When I got to my car I had a look at the phone a Sony Erricsson.

Had a look at the pictures in the memory and there were pics of father and baby child and husband and wife (I presume)
Then I had a guilty trip and thought these are pics of his wife and child.
Also I thought If I lost my phone then hopefully somebody would hand it in and all would be ok!

So I took the phone to the place where I found it. The assistant asked me where I found the phone and I showed the assistant where it was. Then followed him back to his work station.

He then immediately gave the phone to this bloke who was standing at his work station who had obviously lost it.

All I heard was 'Oh man you have found it' I made a quick exit!

Now I know I have done the right thing but I still feel guilty for taking it in the first place!

What do other people think?

2007-04-21 01:19:32 · 15 answers · asked by david b 2 in Law & Ethics

i think false result will release to the nigerian at large

2007-04-21 01:06:30 · 8 answers · asked by kayode o 1 in Government

Some of our political leadership ( including some non political heads ) constantly live in fear of terrorism as they are not judicious to general public.
They at times ask questions which reflect fear of their minds
Should these people be judicious

2007-04-21 01:00:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Civic Participation

2007-04-21 00:49:18 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-04-21 00:35:55 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2007-04-21 00:12:37 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

How about some new strategies? What tactics do you think work best? We've seen roadside bombs used to great effect but is there any way they could be improved? And what about alternatives to suicide bombers? The resistance might be desperate and hopelessly outgunned but there must be better ways.

What tactics are most suitable for a guerilla war against a larger, better equipped force?

2007-04-21 00:11:11 · 16 answers · asked by airmonkey1001 4 in Military

My partner purchased a settee, on finance, (buy now pay later or pay full amount of settee in12months time and pay no interest.) My partner didn't live with me when we purchased the settee, he took out the credit agreement in his name from his mothers address.He did this as a favour for me, as i couldn't get the finance, we agreed that i would save up to pay for the settee outright at the end of the 12 months. I saved up the money and shortly after my partner moved in with me, however due to him constantly leaving me in financail difficulties i had to keep breaking into the settee money to pay bills etc, soon it was all gone, Now my partner and i have seperated, it is time to pay for the settee and he is refusing to pay the finance, and has told me he will get them to re-possess the settee rather than pay for something he is not using.
Can he do this? Can they take my settee away even though it is not me that has broken the credit agreement?? Help!! I am worried sick, i have 3 kids

2007-04-21 00:09:29 · 6 answers · asked by sammie77 3 in Law & Ethics

First thing-when a liberal says "working folks" they mean someone that works at Wal Mart or McDonalds, not someone with a real job.
Look-the top 35% wage earners in our country pay 96% of all our taxes. Those are your rich guys paying all that tax. So, the bottom 65% wage earners pay the other 4% of the tax. This is why we give the rich people tax breaks, because they are paying a lot of tax from get go. We have not even begun to cover things like property tax or state tax.

2007-04-21 00:03:59 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics