The government has banned many substances that it claims are "dangerous" and "damaging", yet is it morally correct that they should control our intake of substances? Also, when I say intake I don't just mean what we aren't allowed to eat, I mean what we are ENCOURAGED to eat. For example, Monosodium glutamate is a common food additive which is highly damaging to one's body and mind. It is considered by scientists to be a neurotoxin, not unlike MDMA (or Ecstasy). Despite the studies that prove the toxicity of MSG, the FDA has chosen not only to allow the use of monosodium glutamate food, but has encouraged use under a variety of names to hide its presence in many food products. Such names include glutamic acid, hydrolyzed protein, autolyzed protein, textured protein, yeast extract, and many more. Yet there are other substances which have been proven to be safe, in relative terms, based on various scientific and medical studies which are regulated with great zeal (such as cannabis).
2007-02-28
11:46:09
·
9 answers
·
asked by
ryanmcprussin
1
in
Law & Ethics