Politics & Government - 31 August 2006

2006-08-31 04:32:27 · 8 answers · asked by londonhawk 4 in Government

Does anyone know? The president and Rumsfeld criticize those who call for a withdrawal of our troops but if victory is defined as handing security over to the Iraqi military then that means pulling our troops out. Is it just a question of timing? Or do you think they define victory as stabilizing things enough so we can use Iraq as a staging area to go into Iran?

2006-08-31 04:30:58 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

2006-08-31 04:29:14 · 10 answers · asked by ? 5 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-08-31 04:28:39 · 5 answers · asked by ? 5 in Other - Politics & Government

Then divorces them both different times and dates. what does that mean?

2006-08-31 04:27:57 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2006-08-31 04:27:10 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

Americans repeat like parrots what they hear and i do not believe they have a clue what some of the slogans they repeat really mean ..
WHAT a bunch of ball busting self rightoues immature idiots to try and tell the rest of the world how to live when in your own homes you can not get along without killing one another .

2006-08-31 04:24:58 · 13 answers · asked by playtoofast 6 in Politics

'Amnesty' dead, Fox tells Mexicans
Says Bush told him no chance for legislation this year

World Net Daily | July 21 2006

Mexican President Vicente Fox told radio listeners in his country that the idea of an amnesty for illegal aliens in the U.S. is dead – at least for a time.

Fox said President Bush advised him of the political realities of passing his "comprehensive immigration reform plan" this year during a flight from St. Petersburg, Russia, to Madrid, Spain. Congress will shortly be adjourning until the November election.

Fox said Bush "pointed out that this period is very short, there are only two or three weeks before Congress members go on the election campaign. So the chance of the immigration issue reaching approval in the House of Representatives and reaching join approval isn't very high."

A White House spokesman acknowledged Bush made the comment to Fox, but said that doesn't mean the president won't be back promoting his immigration plan before the end of the year.

2006-08-31 04:24:48 · 7 answers · asked by Renegade. 3 in Immigration

Is there great significance is this phrase?
What's the "second war" to be?

2006-08-31 04:23:31 · 17 answers · asked by murphy 5 in Politics

2006-08-31 04:20:51 · 18 answers · asked by Becca W 1 in Politics

both concepts and ideas are offense to peace loving people around the world .
ITS to bad there is no way to lock all you war mongers in a room where you can not hurt anyone else .
HOW i wish it where possible everyday to do this .

2006-08-31 04:20:41 · 13 answers · asked by playtoofast 6 in Politics

If you do not know, have a look to this website.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7828123714384920696

2006-08-31 04:20:12 · 10 answers · asked by Abularaby 4 in Politics

I thought that by posting it in more than one relevant category - more people would get the chance to read it and answer

2006-08-31 04:19:56 · 18 answers · asked by vincegill 3 in Law Enforcement & Police

1. In term of Security,
2. Good Goverment,
3. Low crime rate.
4. Friendly people

2006-08-31 04:18:44 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

this person claims to know the sherriff on up and gets away with it.

2006-08-31 04:17:59 · 17 answers · asked by flyinghwk 1 in Law & Ethics

2006-08-31 04:17:14 · 14 answers · asked by Nigel Powell 1 in Other - Politics & Government

Many people believe that the current trend of global warming is a natural cycle, albeit accelerated by mankind's use of fossil fuels, etc, and they have scientific evidence to support this. However, there is another camp that believes that mankind is the cause of this rapid (geologically speaking) warming of Earth's climate and that irreparable damage is being done to the biosphere which threatens most life on the planet. These people also cite scientific evidence in support of their hypothesis. Unfortunately this argument has become a political debate wtih many conservatives and liberals taking up arms for the first and second proposals, respectively. When the U.S. invaded Iraq to combat terrorism in 2003 it did so under what have been discovered to be false pretenses. However no one would disagree that dethroning Saddam was a bad thing. Would it not then be illogical to launch a preemptive strike on global warming? No one will die in that effort.

2006-08-31 04:17:06 · 7 answers · asked by Nerdbot 5000 2 in Law & Ethics

its true i bribed a an (american)cop wit a donut and it worked!

2006-08-31 04:14:44 · 22 answers · asked by hunter 3 in Law Enforcement & Police

Make your case now, muslim bigots!

2006-08-31 04:13:59 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

See their replies to my questions:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AqoWpL5xImy942y9ra2ZUn7sy6IX?qid=20060829055948AAKoTdt

2006-08-31 04:13:58 · 16 answers · asked by Dr MK Khaishagi 2 in Politics

un-pave the streets ?
turn it into a cantina?
turn it into a flea market?

2006-08-31 04:13:48 · 10 answers · asked by hayleylov 6 in Immigration

I'm from a foriegn country and would like to know the answers. And what happens to that country should one party remain in office for too long? Intelligent answers please.

Thanks.

2006-08-31 04:12:21 · 5 answers · asked by davemg21 3 in Other - Politics & Government

THATS all the world needs is more nukes in any nation .THE real threat is the existance of one .NOT the one Iran might have but the ONE .NO nation should have them period .THIS was is and will be a bad idea .IT forces unacceptable behavior by those who have them and fear for those who do not .
FORCE is what makes people bend to the will of others when confronted with choice of do as i say or else .

2006-08-31 04:12:02 · 11 answers · asked by playtoofast 6 in Politics

will be fat, 3 will be Mexican, and 2 Muslim?

2006-08-31 04:11:02 · 14 answers · asked by tsar 2 in Politics

2006-08-31 04:10:07 · 10 answers · asked by nicky 3 in Politics

2006-08-31 04:08:16 · 12 answers · asked by lalchandxnc 1 in Government

I deeded 1 acre of land to my sister in law just so she could get a loan. The lawyer said i couldnt put anything on the deed as to it not being able to be sold etc cause then they wouldnt be able to get a loan.well since they got the land it has been hello.there was also a 25ft easement thru woods to there prop and my daughters.it was made that big so that all the big trees would be left.they took everything down.not only that they put up a fence on my property and i cant take it down til we go to another court .email me and ill explain more .its who u knopw in this town money talks and i guess thats the way it will always be thanking u all in advance

2006-08-31 04:07:53 · 8 answers · asked by ga_girl31516 1 in Law & Ethics

2006-08-31 04:07:52 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

2006-08-31 04:07:16 · 3 answers · asked by oaksterdamhippiechick 5 in Politics

save our state, in Maywood CA and they planted their mexican flag does that mean they think they already have maywood ca ? and its part of their mexico ? funny they called people who wanted to protest invaders seems you have freedom of speech in CA only if your mexican and do most people view this act as a act of war ?

2006-08-31 04:06:52 · 13 answers · asked by hayleylov 6 in Immigration