Truman's cabinet predicted 725,000 american casualties 200,000 of which would have been deaths and 28 million japanese civillian deaths not including hundreds of thousands of japanese soldier's deaths. Why is it then, that people still believe that the bombing was unethical? Am I wrong in saying that it was the lesser of two evils? Also, why does no one comment on the fact that we killed more japanese with napalm than with the bombs? Is it worse to kill with a gun than with a fist? Or in this case, worse to kill with fire than with a bomb?
2007-12-09
15:52:26
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous