Current Events - December 2007

Wht is it whenever I post a Q it never bloody shows?
This has happened twice tonight, and I'm really starting to get annoyed.

2007-12-09 10:43:12 · 33 answers · asked by Grace 5

2007-12-09 10:23:06 · 7 answers · asked by Denise 1

2007-12-09 10:00:53 · 17 answers · asked by dave s 2

Isn't it time for Labour to just ditch the idea altogether?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/12/09/nterror109.xml

The head of MI5 has said he will not support the detention of terror suspects beyond 28 days, striking a fresh blow against Gordon Brown's anti-terror plans.

Jonathan Evans told MPs at a private meeting that he was not willing to back the Government's proposal to extend to 42 days the period for which suspected terrorists may be detained without charge.

The Prime Minister is already under pressure on the issue with growing opposition among MPs threatening him with a Commons defeat.

A report by the Home Affairs select committee is expected to cite strong opposition to the plans from senior figures including Sir Ken MacDonald, the Director of Public Prosecutions, and Lord Goldsmith, the former attorney general.

2007-12-09 09:32:10 · 7 answers · asked by slıɐuǝoʇ 6

I am tolerant of homosexuals, all races...but I am also tolerant of racist and homophobic viewpoints.

In a recent poll done on african americans, it appears that a large portion of african americans hold racist beleifs toward whites. A renowned black man even publicly stated racist beleifs toward white people in the United States. Furthermore, there are also white racists, but they don't go public as often for fear of being attacked. The double standard.

So if there are racists in this country, should we not protect them both equally as moral viewpoints under the law? as long as the racist does not promote violence, I see no reason why the racist should be attacked. Because he has a different moral value system than us? different views/perceptions?

I think racists should be just as tolerated as homosexuals. I mean, they are equally as controversial. It is well known that the christian right blatantly declares homosexuality an amoral sin.

Racists have equally valid rights.

2007-12-09 08:22:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Its really annoying.

2007-12-09 08:15:03 · 28 answers · asked by Lilli 1

Or does ne1 bother?

2007-12-09 08:01:30 · 5 answers · asked by Lilli 1

Here is my theory: Those boys slipped an already drunk girl something to knock her out then abused her and when she didn't wake up they freaked out. Then I think they called the judge that is one of the kid's dads and asked what do to with her. Thinking of their futures and being freaked out, the judge-dad tells them to dump her in the water, because as well all know, Habus Corpus applies. Just my theory.....what's yours? I feel so bad for he friends and family! How awful!!!

2007-12-09 06:45:27 · 8 answers · asked by SadToday22 3

You know who you are !!!

2007-12-09 06:36:38 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Voice of the White House

Washington, D.C., December 6, 2007: “Some things of interest, perhaps. Is there blame to assess over the failed war in Iraq? Is this futile and destructive struggle the fault of a mentally defective President, egged on by a vicious and unbalance Vice President?

The recent revelation by the U.S. intelligence community that Iran, often put forward by Bush and Cheney as planning to attack everyone with atomic bombs, has been revealed to be utterly false. In spite of these revelations, Bush continues to mumble and rant about his determination to attack Iran. There is an interesting, and frightening, background to all of this non-stop lying and it is not the weak character of George Bush or the manic viciousness of Dick Cheney.

The Pentagon has long been outraged at the piecemeal destruction of both the U.S. Army and the Marine Corps in the meat grinder that Iraq has become. They know who the real culprits are because they have identified them and been reading their top secret messages for two years now.

Are they listening to the White House? No, they are watching Israel like a hawk, reading their top secret diplomatic and military traffic, getting reports almost daily from U.S. intelligence personnel stationed in Israel and they have long ago extended their surveillance to the Israeli diplomatic messaging.

From this, they have built up a massive dossier that shows very clearly that the driving force behind the Iraq invasion and now, the frenzy to attack Iran is purely Israeli.

That country has so subverted our official institutions with money as the carrot and attacks by their almost complete control of the American print and television media as the stick. Israel has used the neo-cons to put forward Israel’s needs to Bush…who listens raptly and obeys without question.

They hated Saddam Hussein because he dared to fire rockets into Israel during the Gulf War and they suggested that if American forces destroyed their enemy, we could all share in the revenues from Iraqi oil. That this plan collapsed is certain but most Americans do not know that the so-called “Yellowcake uranium” story upon which Bush based his war was a pure Israeli invention.

Now, with even the possibility that Iran might be working on an atomic bomb, a bomb which would certainly be used against Israel, that country has doubled and redoubled its clandestine efforts to push America into pulling their chestnuts out of the Mideast fire.

Israel, according to intercepted conversations by the Pentagon (and now circulating in Washington) is prepared to fight to the last American life. And those who mourn the young American dead and mangled soldiers in Iraq do not need to look at the manic and deluded White House but to Tel Aviv who killed and maimed their sons, brothers, fathers and husbands.

In a very true sense, the leaking of the report on the halt in the Iranian atomic development program was a form of very high level mutiny on the part of Bush’s military high command. This was not any kind of an error but a deliberate and hopefully successful, plan to force the United States away from blind obedience to Israel’s murderous wishes.

2007-12-09 06:23:56 · 21 answers · asked by openyoureyespeople! 5

Droopy Drew Peterson was still married to Savio when he met Stacy. She was just 16 when she met Peterson, her sister Cassandra Cales said. Stacy Peterson was working at SpringHill Suites hotel at the time. Drew Peterson was night commander, and his partner was dating a woman who worked there. Drew Peterson started hitting on her.

Cales said Drew Peterson was still living with Savio but was sleeping in the basement. Stacy Peterson would sneak in and spend the night, she said.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-drew_bd_18nov18,1,2715802.story?page=1

16 years old and he was forty something? Isn't that just sick? I know it is illegal and since Droopy is a cop, he damn well knew it too. What makes this man think he is above the law?

2007-12-09 05:35:13 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

This kid who killed in the Omaha mall wanted fame. He got it! I am sure there are many other sickos out there plotting their future fame. They do not show crazies running out on football fields but will give us a life story of this kid who otherwise would have been unknown.

Does the Government control the media? Do ratings control the media? Can we contact our Congressmen? Should we boycott newspapers and magazines that glorify these morons? Seems like we should be doing SOMETHING!

Maybe someone should sue the media when something like this happens because they encourage it!

Your thoughts?

2007-12-09 04:35:39 · 17 answers · asked by no name 4

In front of a car park full of people?
Or a door etc?

2007-12-09 04:12:56 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Crying over a video tape of water tourcher. They chop off our guys heads and we are not suppose to do anything back.

2007-12-09 03:55:06 · 10 answers · asked by us citizen 5

I'm completely against the renewed whaling efforts by the Japanese. I thought we had learned enough about the intelligence and social structure of these animals to leave them alone. But I guess not. The Japanese just "gotta have" the most exotic sushi they can get.

That said, in the current climate of anti-terrorism efforts, could the Japanese treat interference by a Greenpeace ship as an act of aggression by a terrorist organization, and if the Japanese Navy was accompanying their whaling ship, would that Navy vessel be within its rights to take any responsive action necessary to defend its ship from terrorists?

In other words, torpedo and sink the ship?

It's really no different than if Al Quaida had a ship and it was attacking other ships at sea. Greenpeace may have better intentions, but their tactics are still an act of terroristic aggression, no less than eco-terrorists who set fire to SUV car lots.

What do you think?

2007-12-09 03:01:23 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

and how the hell have they got away with it for over 6 months

2007-12-09 02:54:47 · 21 answers · asked by McTerminator 1

2007-12-09 02:24:43 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-09 02:13:20 · 3 answers · asked by suet moon 5

2007-12-09 01:27:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is it right that even though she knew her husband was alive and still took and enjoyed spending the insurance money. She now blatently sells her story to the newspapers. In my opinion she is as guilty as her husband and should suffer the same punishment.. She needs to stop looking like a victim. and accept her guilt. Instead of trying to blame her husband. In the photographs with him she didn't appear to be remorseful.just smug she got away with fraud.

2007-12-09 00:55:13 · 12 answers · asked by Ariana 5

Does anyone find it amazing that in the space of 7 months we have seen the two extremes of world class scam.

On the one hand the McCanns who amassed a £ million plus weathy financial backers purely by going down the pub and losing their daughter - a class act, top scammers.

On the other hand the Darwins who devised an elecborate plan of disaster, disapearance etc to defraud life assurance and rid debts but then tottally messed it up.

Is there a perfect scam or is much of it down to luck or 'unluck' ?

2007-12-08 23:42:07 · 24 answers · asked by 17pdr 4

I hereby wish to apologise to all McFanns for any suggestion that Kate and Gerry McCann have in anyway benefited financially from the loss of their daughter.

I hope you did not take offence ?

Source: http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0eLp9AydH6di6/610x.jpg

2007-12-08 23:11:59 · 20 answers · asked by 17pdr 4

What will be their situation next year?

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/pressass/20071208/tuk-millions-still-paying-for-xmas2006-6323e80_2.html

Do you think some credit cards and store cards should take some of the responsibility here, even when they know that money is owed they still offer more. They make it very easy to start with by huge discounts and money off then hammer people with the interest.

what do you think?

2007-12-08 23:08:22 · 20 answers · asked by Agent Zero® 5

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071205/ap_po/2008_the_personal_side

2007-12-08 23:03:47 · 8 answers · asked by Stephanie C 1

A CIA linked plane (N987SA), previously used to bring 'terrorist' suspects to Gitmo, crashed in Mexico in September. 5 tonnes of cocaine was found in the wreckage - the plane was enroute to the US. What is the CIA really doing in the 'war on terror'?

2007-12-08 22:26:43 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Those hoping to donate more into the coffers of the two McScammers will be sorely disapointed. Website McScam has been frozen for some days now. Presumably the MAIN SUSPECTS now have enough money to 'leave no scam unturned' ?

Source: www.FindMadeleine.com

2007-12-08 21:56:35 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

We read with festive spirit that the two child neglectors and MAIN SUSPECTS could be quizzed by Police on Christmas Day.

Perhaps its only fair dues, the two Tapas wine guzzlers Kate and Gerry have wasted huge amounts of Police time over the last 7 months, perhaps the Police want to pay back the pleasure as a present on Christmas Day ?

Source: http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/23416/McCann-quizmas/

2007-12-08 21:47:16 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Dont you get fed up with some on YA who just because they do not agree with McCann questions or answers threaten those 'on behalf of' the child neglectors with Defamation !

What goes through somepeoples minds that they feel the need to act like unpaid amateur solicitors for two child neglecting MAIN SUSPECTS in a young childs disapearance ?

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

2007-12-08 20:59:16 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-08 19:35:26 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I read in a newspaper that in 2012 high level cataclysmic events are going to occur.. Water is being depleted... Ozone is opening up?? Is the government really doing something about this? Are they preparing evac's to space? Are they coming up with new solutions? not just electronic cars...

2007-12-08 17:54:34 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous