Is it right that even though she knew her husband was alive and still took and enjoyed spending the insurance money. She now blatently sells her story to the newspapers. In my opinion she is as guilty as her husband and should suffer the same punishment.. She needs to stop looking like a victim. and accept her guilt. Instead of trying to blame her husband. In the photographs with him she didn't appear to be remorseful.just smug she got away with fraud.
2007-12-09 00:55:13 · 12 answers · asked by Ariana 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Greedy, smug, lying, cheating, conning b*tch springs to my mind.
Her and the hubby knew exactly what they were doing.
I saw more than one photo where they were both looking incredibly smug. Looking like they had got away with it. She has admitted that she knew he was stiil alive.
She could'nt have spent £100000 no one can spend that amount!!
2007-12-09 02:22:42 · answer #1 · answered by Grace 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's possible that her story is true -namely that he organised his disappearance and she only knew later, after she had spent the insurance money. In that case, morally she should give the money back, but it doesn't make her wrong to have taken it if it was in good faith.
I don't know how you can analyse one photo of her smiling and decide she was smug at getting away with it.
The truth will come out, but it won't be by assumptions like this.
2007-12-09 01:24:07 · answer #2 · answered by Netty 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
They are both as guilty as each other and as there are several hundred thousands of pounds at stake, they better be languishing in jail for quite a few years.
2007-12-09 01:03:18 · answer #3 · answered by Rock me Amadeus 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Totally agree with you but probably needs the money to pay back what she should.
2007-12-09 01:06:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If she is proved to have knowledge in her husbands disappearance and is charged. She will not be allowed to profit from her crime. It is prohibited in this country.
2007-12-09 01:22:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think they cooked this up together and i think she as stashed some money away that is why she never came back to the UK straight away
2007-12-09 05:30:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you. But we cannot do anything except not buying her story.
2007-12-09 01:04:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She's gonna probably need that money for attorney fees and/or bail money.
2007-12-09 01:16:30 · answer #8 · answered by ~RedBird~ 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I agree with ollie
2007-12-09 01:05:16 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hi,I agree I think she is covering her tracks.Reckon she was in on it from the start.Maybe they planned this lot.
2007-12-09 00:59:15 · answer #10 · answered by Ollie 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋