Seriously is this the proof we need that Bush lied yet?
Or do we have to invent the time machine and go back to see him lie to be sure?
2007-12-10 01:36:09 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I never said Clinton Didn't lie
He did but that is not the Issue
sure he lied about sex and no one died
Bush's lie has cost 1000's of lives
hmm fail to see how Clinton is nearly as bad sorry
2007-12-10 01:54:15 · update #1
THE LIAR HAS TO KEEP ON LYING AFTER THEIR FIRST LIE. It's one of the consequences of departing from telling the truth and being morally dishonest or morally empty. Lying can be pathological however, and if it is, then like a sociopath, the difference between telling a truth and a Lie is simply not part of their mental equation. Bush43 should be impeached, but gutless Democrats can't be inconvenienced even though they goofed when they gave Bush43 and Dick Cheney Carte Blanch. There's plenty of blame to go around and hopefully the next USPresident will undo the incompetent disasters we continue to witness. We need to return to the rule of laws and not the rule of persons in power. The faith in the US Constitution and the governing processes therein has to be returned to. The first thing a new President should do is set the Patriot acts aside as Constitutional abominations!!! And then we should get the troops the hell out of Iraq and go get Osama hiding under our very noses under a new dictator in the the hinterlands of Pakistan!
BTW, some humans already are temporal machines!!!And those that are, know how they can correct prior mistakes!
2007-12-10 02:28:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is what the NIE revealed. It revealed that Iran says it stopped making nuclear improvements in 2003. No one else said that... just Iran. So, all of a sudden Iran is the cute puppy dog with big innocent eyes and everyone is buying their new line of lies. Iran would like nothing better than to press the button against Israel. And that is exactly why Iran is continuing to build long range Sahhab missiles. Now... here's what is interesting. The Sahhabs are only effective if carrying nuclear warheads. Iran is also building a new water reactor in Arak. It's only purpose is to produce plutonium.
Still think Iran intends to play nice?
2007-12-10 03:05:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Uhh, no.
Seriously, how is this latest NIE, which is an evaluation of data gathered from various shadowy sources over the last several years, any indication at all that Bush knew something other than what he said before?
2007-12-10 02:11:52 · answer #3 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Funny what we are able to conveniently forget:
"I did not have sex with that lady, Miss Lewinsky"
A lie UNDER OATH after turning the Oval Office into the "First Brothel".....
2007-12-10 01:48:07 · answer #4 · answered by Millie 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Do you really need proof or do just need to be logical? This would make lie number? My favourite is:
"Our country is strong. We go forward to defend freedom and all that is good and just in our world." WHAAAAAAAAAAAT
2007-12-10 01:42:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋