The McCanns and their Tapas group have had a reunion to "talk tactics". Why they need tactics instead of just telling the truth speaks volumes. Apparently it was held in a hotel last month, just after the reports that 2 of the Tapas group wanted to change their statements. It is unclear whether Diane Webster who is the mother of Fiona Payne attended. She is the woman who contradicted the others by saying that the group were responsible for checking their OWN children. She also didn't move from the table in the Tapas bar after Kate came in screaming " they've taken Madeleine" instead, according to the waiters she just sat there looking scared.
So, suspects and witnesses getting together to talk tactics. My opinion is that this "reunion" was planned so that the Tapas group could tie up lose ends in their fairy tale abduction and svengali Gerry could reassure himself that their was no weak link in the chain of lies, possibly putting on the pressure on any of the group who were wavering
2007-12-09 23:42:37 · 19 answers · asked by trancebabe 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
My question is this, do you think that there is a need to talk tactics in the first place if they are all telling the truth and could this be construed as tampering with witnesses
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=500983&in_page_id=1770
2007-12-09 23:44:03 · update #1
They should have no need to talk tactics,they only need to speak the truth and that should come naturally without having to be rehearsed. The whole lot of them are liars who are in it up to their necks. Been doing a bit of reading Trance and I find that the "Triangle" is the Masonic sign of the Freemasons. Apparently on one of the McCann interviews this Triangle was clearly visible in the background suggesting that it was a sign that the Masons would help them.
How can the McCanns and friends "talk tactics" as to how to find Maddy when the all know she is dead ??? There are still some gullible people around and the McCanns love them.
2007-12-10 02:11:08 · answer #1 · answered by little weed 6 · 10⤊ 4⤋
Sounds lik a*se covering to get the story straight to me! Someone is worried.
2007-12-10 03:11:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
this proves everything as far as im concerned, just before the police questioning and right after claims that 2 want to change their stories, well done the mccanns
2007-12-10 00:57:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 5⤋
The thing which has always puzzled me is why "They've taken Madelaine"? The wording of this sentence suggests that from the outset there was some knowledge that somebody was involved in the disappearance. My first assumption would have been that my kid had got out of bed and wandered outside, perhaps looking for me, and to instigate a search around the local streets.
I'm sure that my words on discovering my daughter had vanished from her bedroom, would have been "Madelaine has disappeared".
Maybe the group are meeting up for support - it must have been pretty traumatic for all them
2007-12-09 23:57:32 · answer #4 · answered by Veronica Alicia 7 · 11⤊ 9⤋
It used to surprise me to read reports of how, when some event happens in a TV soap, viewers send cards and letters to the characters, identifying them as real people. Some viewers seem to lose the distinction between the actor and the character being played. Let someone be killed off on Coronation Street, and sympathy cards will come in.
What is just as remarkable is how real life events, in their turn, become subsumed into the TV soap context, and the latest news becomes just another plot twist. A similar blurring between the conceits of fiction and the real world is taking place in the opposite direction. The sorry business of this missing child is now just another soap, with people talking of it in the same terms as the latest episode from Eastenders.
Incidentally, the 'witnesses' are not prohibited 'by law' from talking to each other. No one has been charged, and there is no court case in progress.
2007-12-10 00:10:01 · answer #5 · answered by kinning_park 5 · 6⤊ 12⤋
Swinging more like.
2007-12-10 01:26:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
It's been from the start "tactics", we just need to know who from, McJeckyll or McHide...
Do they really care about find Madeleine? -Don't think so.
Thank you, star.
2007-12-10 00:29:04 · answer #7 · answered by Tim 4 · 13⤊ 6⤋
I thought witnesses could not talk to each other while an investigation was still in progress?
But hey, they are doctors, nothing will be done or said.
2007-12-09 23:50:06 · answer #8 · answered by tattie_herbert 6 · 21⤊ 6⤋
i remember there was a time when this case was suppose to be about finding a missing child, it has long since been about covering up a crime and covering the butts, justice will soon prevail
2007-12-09 23:51:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 20⤊ 9⤋
I have always said that too many things didn't add up in this case from the beginning. I really dont understand why they would need to "talk tactics". That sounds very dodgy if you ask me.
2007-12-09 23:46:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 19⤊ 11⤋