I saw yet another report that the White House is looking for a "War Czar" to coordinate the US government management of the war. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070506/ap_on_go_pr_wh/war_czar
Um, isn't that what we have a National Security Council for? Supposedly the point of this position is to cut through the red tape, but how does adding another layer of bueracracy help cut through red tape, especially when this guy will apparently be outside the chain of command.
Even the Heritage foundation thinks it's a loopy idea. Lord help us.
Thought?
2007-05-06
14:50:05
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Chance20_m
5
in
Current Events